Does hardware accelerated Qemu work on OpenBSD now? It didn't at the
end of 2014.
Thanks,
SteveT
On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:38:48 +0500
"dmitry.sensei" wrote:
> It works :) If i added ifconfig tap0
> However I have not yet understand how :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM, John Long wrote:
Hi Gareth,
Yes, I too understand the frustration with trolls who come on a
software's mailing list unflatteringly comparing it to an alternative.
That's just troll crap.
But I'm not fond of the phrase "GNU/Linux douche bags". Does being a
credible BSD guy require a litmus test of repudiating Linu
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Andy Bradford
wrote:
> Anyway, just some musings. Is there anyone else out there using
> lpr/lpd/lprm from base? Maybe I'm the only one?
I've been using the lp* tools for many years for personal printing, first
using a PostScript HP 4050dn and now using
i caught this in a process listing, and did a double take.
$ ps ax|grep control
31337 ?? I 0:00.09 smtpd: control (smtpd)
$ ps auxw|grep control
_smtpd 31337 0.0 0.0 1592 4 ?? I 21Jan160:00.09 smtpd:
control (smtpd)
i thought it was interesting enough to share given the
It works :) If i added ifconfig tap0
However I have not yet understand how :)
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:45 PM, John Long wrote:
> Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:06:34AM +0500, dmitry.sensei wrote:
>
>> Can you give generic guide to setting up a network in Qemu (OpenBSD)?
>> I have one p
Thus said Tobias Ulmer on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:51:28 +0100:
> No really, it is outdated beyond rescue.
But it does work (at least in some configurations). To enable my
PostScript printers, all I have to do is add a single line to
/etc/printcap... well, maybe 2 lines.
printer:\
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 09:10 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman
> > Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lists to spread the gospel of OpenBSD!
^^
Whoa whoa whoa, that is not
If you call the file .Xdefaults it will be used in both scenarios
described, with no need for the `xrdb` command.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 at 08:47 Jiri B wrote:
> XDM fires up /etc/X11/xdm/Xsession, easy to read. One can even
> customize XDM and all other things in /etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config.
>
> It sh
Holger Glaess [gla...@glaessixs.de] wrote:
> hi
>
> can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ?
>
> is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ?
Yes although there may be more speed optimization possible
> Eric Furman wrote on Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:23:27PM -0500:
>
> > OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating system.
> > VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their operating system.
> > Hell, even Windows people don't come on this list and discuss their OS.
> > I'
David Coppa gmail.com> writes:
> Il 17/feb/2016 14:52, "Lampshade" poczta.fm> ha scritto:
> >
> > Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows
> > have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't.
>
> Not until Firefox 46.
It *is* already in Nightly builds (but too hard for big guys
to cope wit
hi
can some tell me what the status is for 5.9 octeon port ?
is the usb port stable enough to handle an harddisk ?
thanks
holger
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 11:49:30AM -0600, Chris Bennett wrote:
> After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is
> significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of
> consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike
> laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high
Motty Cruz writes:
> I see the following error in my firewall log:
> client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 (this
> IP is on the firewall interface facing the public)
> proxy cannot connect to server xx.xxx.x.48: No route to host
Looks like a log message from ftp-proxy(
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
>
> The only thing wrong with lpd is nobody tedu'ed it yet.
>
> No really, it is outdated beyond rescue. If you want to write a new
> print job queueing system, sure, have fun. Maybe you can come up with a
> 'cups' that doesn't suck?
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0900, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
>> wifi router
>> 192.168.100.254
>> |
>> |wireless
>> |
>> rum0:dhcpcd
>
> This kind of bridge between two wireless devices requires support for
> the WDS ("wireless distrib
On 17 February 2016 at 04:23, Eric Furman wrote:
> I'm totally confused as to why we constantly get GNU/Linux douche bags
> on this list wanting to talk about GNU/Linux.
>
To get equal time to teach the controversy?
I see the following error in my firewall log:
client limit (100) reached, refusing connection from xx.xxx.x.26 (this
IP is on the firewall interface facing the public)
proxy cannot connect to server xx.xxx.x.48: No route to host
Thanks,
_Motty
After reading up on printers in use, I discovered that there is
significant use of line printers due to their very low cost of
consumables, production of a very long lasting output, unlike
laser/thermal/inkjet printers and high reliability.
Is anyone using these in a high volume output setting (no
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:54:54AM +0900, Tuyosi Takesima wrote:
> wifi router
> 192.168.100.254
> |
> |wireless
> |
> rum0:dhcpcd
This kind of bridge between two wireless devices requires support for
the WDS ("wireless distribution system") extension for both the wifi
router and rum0. https://en.
On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Lampshade wrote:
> Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows
> have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't.
> I run browsers on the other user account in OpenBSD.
Do you also sandbox the browser with some sort of remote desktop, or run
under a separate X session? AFAIK
Il 17/feb/2016 14:52, "Lampshade" ha scritto:
>
> Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows
> have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't.
Not until Firefox 46.
I'm also a big GNU/Linux fan, but I can understand the frustration of
people who constantly give credit to others for their work.
The GNU project did not inspire BSD.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Steve Litt
wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500
> Eric Furman wrote:
>
> > OS400 peopl
Hi,
Can you add a link to "http://www.openbsd.org"; on the OpenBSD logo
(smalltitle.gif) located at http://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ ?
It will be better for browsing, to come back.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Wesley MOUEDINE ASSABY
www.openbsdjumpstart.org
Does original Firefox compiled by Mozilla running on Windows
have W^X? I bet: no, it doesn't.
I run browsers on the other user account in OpenBSD.
Made my day.
http://www.eweek.com/security/pwn2own-hacking-contest-returns-as-joint-hpe-
trend-micro-effort.html
Quote:
One change in the 2016 event is that the Mozilla Firefox Web browser
is no longer part of the contest.
"We wanted to focus on the browsers that have made serious security
imp
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 09:09:01AM -0700, Jorge Luis wrote:
> Is true that the BSD developers were inspired to make their code free
> software by the example of the GNU Project, and explicit appeals from GNU
> activists helped persuade them?
No. BSD predates the GNU project.
> If no, what is the
On 16/02/2016 11:59 πμ, George Mamalakis wrote:
Hi all!
I'm trying to configure an ikev2 VPN gateway on my OpenBSD 5.8 box to
allow remote access to my local network from various, road-warrior
client "types" (MS Windows, Linux's, BSD's). My example local network
is 10.0.0.0/24 and my public I
On 2016/02/16 20:04, Christopher Snell wrote:
> Yes, the Listen-on is static. Unfortunately, changing the 0.0.0.0 in
> hostname.pppoe0 breaks PPPoE.
That will be ISP-dependent then, you can definitely hardcode it with
some providers.
> I think I could work around this in netstart by simply sleep
On 2016-02-16 16:34, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Le Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:05:51 +0100,
> Clemens Goessnitzer a écrit :
>
> Ok I think :
>
> the pf.conf rule
> ### rules for internal network ###
> pass inet proto { tcp, udp } from internal:network to port $udp_services
>
> is expanded to
>
> pa
2016-02-17 7:43 GMT+01:00 Steve Litt :
>
> As a GNU/Linux douche bag, I'm wondering why the strong reaction? Has
> somebody hit a nerve? I thought this discussion was just bumbling along
> til you made it a big thing(tm).
>
GNU or Linux are no subject of discussion on this mailing list. The
netiqu
On 2016 Feb 17 (Wed) at 01:43:29 -0500 (-0500), Steve Litt wrote:
:On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500
:Eric Furman wrote:
:
:> OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating
:> system. VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their
:> operating system. Hell, even Windows pe
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:23:27 -0500
Eric Furman wrote:
> OS400 people don't come on this list and discuss their operating
> system. VOS people don't come on this list and discuss their
> operating system. Hell, even Windows people don't come on this list
> and discuss their OS. I'm totally confuse
33 matches
Mail list logo
