On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:10:52AM +, Jason George wrote:
I have an older dual P3-800 Compaq server that started losing time very
rapidly after upgrading to a -CURRENT snapshot over the weekend.
Running anything that threw the machine into a high
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 03:10:52AM +, Jason George wrote:
> I have an older dual P3-800 Compaq server that started losing time very
> rapidly after upgrading to a -CURRENT snapshot over the weekend.
>
> Running anything that threw the machine into a high (>10% sustained) system
> percentage
2007/12/11 Uwe Dippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:20:00 -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> I don't see a need to reconcile the two sides. (It would be good if that
> was possible, though.)
Unfortunately, BSD and GNU come from different perspective, hence
different philosophy of what
Jason Dixon wrote:
> Nobody is criticizing RMS over his opinion. They are criticizing him
> for ignorance and misrepresentation of the facts regarding OpenBSD.
And the solution for that is to point out the factors which
differentiate OpenBSD from the others, because it is these
characteristics w
S. Scott Sima, CISA, CISM wrote:
> Using openbsd 4.2, pf and ftp-proxy.
>
> ftp-proxy -T is not being recognized by pf.conf ruleset. In the
> NOT WORKING (snip) below, the tcpdump shows the ftp-proxied packets
> being ignored by the tagged pass rule and hitting on the final block all
> rule.
>
On Dec 10, 2007 10:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
> > > bios time zone?
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=111956694726618&w=2
Thanks, but I can NOT open the page, could you excerpt for me ?
2007/12/11, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
> > bios time zone?
>
> http://marc.info/?l
Curious problem here, though I'm probably missing something obvious. I
have apm enabled through /etc/rc.conf.local (apmd_flags=""), and when I
issue 'shutdown -h -p now', the system powers off correctly. However,
if I try to use sleep or suspend ('apm -S' or 'apm -z'), the system acts
like it
On Dec 10, 2007 4:02 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 19:39]:
> > That is sure 100% true. I was just trying to be sensitive to the request
of
> > the ntp.org itself asking not to do so. There is multiple zone and as
such
> > it would b
On Dec 10, 2007 9:58 PM, Dongsheng Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
> bios time zone?
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=111956694726618&w=2
DS
OpenBSD assume bios time is utc, but it's PRC, can I tell OpenBSD the
bios time zone?
Dongsheng
On Dec 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Uwe Dippel wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:20:00 -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
That being said, the OpenBSD developers have given their arguments
why
they include firmware and non-free ports, and RMS has given his
arguments why he doesn't recommend systems that do.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:20:00 -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> That being said, the OpenBSD developers have given their arguments why
> they include firmware and non-free ports, and RMS has given his
> arguments why he doesn't recommend systems that do. I don't see this
> thread leading to reconcil
I have an older dual P3-800 Compaq server that started losing time very
rapidly after upgrading to a -CURRENT snapshot over the weekend.
Running anything that threw the machine into a high (>10% sustained) system
percentage caused the clock to lose an incredible amount of time... to the
tune of
You should probably post relevant config files and netstat output.
Your drawing didn't come out very well.
On Dec 10, 2007 6:58 PM, Bret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I have the following computer network:
>
> Internet - OpenBSD 4.2 --- Internal LAN
>
Greetings
I have the following computer network:
Internet - OpenBSD 4.2 --- Internal LAN
I
I
I Wireless Card Wireless Card
Soekris 5501 --- Wireless Card
> > I also had a similar problem after upgrading to 4.2-release, an
> > upgrade to the snapshot from Nov. 17 didn't help:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119602370303500&w=2
>
> In that link, your clock was off by much, but it keep getting closer to
> the real clock, so over time it woul
Tasmanian Devil wrote:
I also had a similar problem after upgrading to 4.2-release, an
upgrade to the snapshot from Nov. 17 didn't help:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119602370303500&w=2
In that link, your clock was off by much, but it keep getting closer to
the real clock, so over time
I also had a similar problem after upgrading to 4.2-release, an
upgrade to the snapshot from Nov. 17 didn't help:
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=119602370303500&w=2
Even though I didn't fix the hardware yet, now with the snapshot from
Dec. 4 installed, ntpd synced the clock fine, at least so
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> One question particularly relevant for this list is why I don't
> recommend OpenBSD. It is not about what the system allows. (Any
> general purpose system allows doing anything at all.) It is about
> what the system suggests to
Using openbsd 4.2, pf and ftp-proxy.
ftp-proxy -T is not being recognized by pf.conf ruleset. In the
NOT WORKING (snip) below, the tcpdump shows the ftp-proxied packets
being ignored by the tagged pass rule and hitting on the final block all
rule.
ftp-proxy invoked as
/usr/sbin/ftp-proxy -TOKF
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
1. Test the diff below
Thanks Otto,
That diff definitely help and fix the problem of clock that drift more
then what's allow to be corrected.
I tested it on two systems, both running current
OpenBSD 4.2-current (GENERIC) #0: Mon Dec 10 17:39:46 EST 2007
And the result
A temporary hack:
I changed the following in /etc/rc:
echo 'setting tty flags'
#ttyflags -a
Previously it wasn't commented out. Now who knows what can of worms
this hack will open up.
Rob.
--
"Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free
our minds" Bob Marley, Redemp
* Sean Cody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-11 00:13]:
> I've seen this happen too but ended up just shutting off ntpd entirely and
> croned an rdate in it's place.
which is a very bad solution
> In my case the clock goes WAAY out and even when I fix it it flys way
> out on the next NTP interv
On Dec 10, 2007 3:31 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Doug Fordham wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2007 12:55 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Speaking
> yes,that is the result of games carp plays with routes (which it
> shouldn not, imo, but anyway). it should finally work as advertised in
> -current even with unnumbered carpdevs.
Hi Henning,
Thanks for the quick response. I will update to -current tomorrow and let you
know how I get on.
All
I've seen this happen too but ended up just shutting off ntpd entirely
and croned an rdate in it's place.
In my case the clock goes WAAY out and even when I fix it it flys
way out on the next NTP interval.
Even if I restart NTPD the damned thing flies way out again a while
later.
I'm
Christopher Vance wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 4:29 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well what are you going to change it to? OpenBSD is used globally.
Perhaps an extra step in the installer, or something implied from
setting the timezone, but you can't presume where it will be used like
t
* Charles Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 22:59]:
> I've been looking into this some more. Are there any issues which
> CARP/OpenBGPd when machines in the CARP group do not have an IP address of
> their own - ie. they have only a shared CARP address?
>
> I find that in this situation, when
On 12/10/07, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "claiming products that use binary blobs and GPL-ed code are more free
> than BSD or ISC stuff is about the dumbest thing i've heard on this list
> lately, and there's plenty of retarded statements that circulate here.
> the pot calling th
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> One question particularly relevant for this list is why I don't
> recommend OpenBSD. It is not about what the system allows. (Any
> general purpose system allows doing anything at all.) It is about
> what the system suggests to
On Dec 10, 2007 4:02 PM, Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 19:39]:
> > That is sure 100% true. I was just trying to be sensitive to the request of
> > the ntp.org itself asking not to do so. There is multiple zone and as such
> > it would b
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
So, these are the same boxes and only the OS was changed, that's why I am
asking.
Some archs use timecounter code now for the clock. That code has a lot
of benefits, but the range of clock drifts that can be compensated for
is not very big. I have an experimental diff here
On Dec 11, 2007 4:29 AM, Nick Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well what are you going to change it to? OpenBSD is used globally.
> Perhaps an extra step in the installer, or something implied from
> setting the timezone, but you can't presume where it will be used like
> that.
Precisely. I h
Hi,
I decided to CVSUP this morning and compiled the kernel. Unlike
yesterday, the boot hung right after the filesystem mounts/checks. I
thought maybe I had better be in sync with Userland, but make build
did nothing to rectify the situation.
I was very careful in making new /dev's, and also mer
I've been looking into this some more. Are there any issues which
CARP/OpenBGPd when machines in the CARP group do not have an IP address of
their own - ie. they have only a shared CARP address?
I find that in this situation, when the CARP master fails the backup router
correctly becomes master
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:07:17PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking a the code, I am trying to understand something on some servers
> that just don't stay sync in the latest kernel (current).
>
> I see some changes were done to the drift, and a few other things.
>
> What is really t
After doing a lot of head banging, i was able to get it working (so far)
# openssl version
OpenSSL 0.9.7j 04 May 2006
# uname -a
OpenBSD ironhost.fistofiron.com 4.2 GENERIC#375 i386
#
this setting causes lot of errors, hence i have commented it.
#prompt = no# this op
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 19:39]:
That is sure 100% true. I was just trying to be sensitive to the request of
the ntp.org itself asking not to do so. There is multiple zone and as such
it would be nice to pick on, just like we pick the timezone when
Hi,
Looking a the code, I am trying to understand something on some servers
that just don't stay sync in the latest kernel (current).
I see some changes were done to the drift, and a few other things.
What is really the logic in the daemon to actually send a sync message
and more importantly
* Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-10 19:39]:
> That is sure 100% true. I was just trying to be sensitive to the request of
> the ntp.org itself asking not to do so. There is multiple zone and as such
> it would be nice to pick on, just like we pick the timezone when we install
> the
On Dec 10, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just passing what I found and the request of ntp.org in that
regard, nothing more.
Further down on http://www.pool.ntp.org/vendors.html I found
Open source projects
Open Source projects are of course particularly welcome to use the
pool i
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 08:58:40PM +0100, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> > He's referring to firmware binaries, not software that runs on the host
> > machine's processor. Browse around under:
> > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/s
Doug Fordham wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 12:55 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
Speaking of strawman arguments; this is such an insult to ones
intelligence. You are basically saying: "y
2007/12/10, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
> (though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware
> blobs). However, its ports system does suggest non-free programs, or
> at least so I was told when I looked for
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 12:57:24PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> He's referring to firmware binaries, not software that runs on the host
> machine's processor. Browse around under:
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/dev/microcode/
>
> For example, the Atmel radio firmware's license
RMS,
Given what I've read, listened to, and specifically what you've said here:
> From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
> (though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware
> blobs). However, its ports system does suggest non-free programs, or
> at least
On Dec 10, 2007 12:55 PM, Jacob Yocom-Piatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Peereboom wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> >
> > Speaking of strawman arguments; this is such an insult to ones
> > intelligence. You are basically saying: "you are retarded
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 02:01:19PM -0500, Steve Shockley wrote:
> Lars NoodC)n wrote:
>> Having a way to sift out the non-free stuff during a search of the ports
>> tree would be useful.
>
> PERMIT_*=(not Yes)
[depending on your definition of '(non-)free']
--
>[<++>-]<+++.>++
Steve Shockley wrote:
> Lars NoodC)n wrote:
>> Having a way to sift out the non-free stuff during a search of the ports
>> tree would be useful.
>
> PERMIT_*=(not Yes)
Thanks.
http://www.openbsd.org/checklist.html
-Lars
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
Having a way to sift out the non-free stuff during a search of the ports
tree would be useful.
PERMIT_*=(not Yes)
Nick Guenther wrote:
> In fairness, these charges seem overzealous; deliberately
> misinterpretting the spirit of the GPL.
That's actually pretty common and successful tactic of the MSFTers that
frequent FreeBSD and troll here occasionaly, too.
... I don't know, though, so I'd
> like it to be cl
Nick Guenther wrote:
On 12/10/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I had some issues with my master ntp server not getting in sync to well
and all other equipment sync to it, get very often deny updates because
of source out of sync. This master sync about 2 thousands other time
devices
Martynas Venckus wrote:
Good day,
For web browsing and mail, i use mozilla-firefox and mozilla-thunderbird
installed from the packages. However, neither firefox nor thunderbird
displays greek fonts properly. Firefox displays some (not all) greek
pages with arabic characters when utf8 encoding i
Richard Stallman wrote:
Since I consider non-free software to be unethical and antisocial, I
think it would be wrong for me to recommend it to others. Therefore,
if a collection of software contains (or suggests installation of)
some non-free program, I do not recommend it. The systems I recomm
Marco Peereboom wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
The fact that OpenBSD is not a variant of GNU is not ethically
important. If OpenBSD did not suggest non-free programs, I would
recommend it along with the free GNU/Linux distros.
Speaking of str
On 2007/12/10 17:06, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I've got a ServerWorks-based Fujitsu-Siemens Xeon box. At 'halt -p'
> (with or without acpi) the following happens (no panic).
Ugh. 'reboot', too.
> Any suggestions?
>
> # halt -p
> /etc/rc.shutdown in progress...
> /etc/rc.shutdown complete.
> syci
Nick Guenther wrote:
From what I have heard, OpenBSD does not contain non-free software
(though I am not sure whether it contains any non-free firmware
blobs).
Um, OpenBSD is the only common OS that is actively against blobs. See
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html#39
We're on the same side here
On 12/10/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had some issues with my master ntp server not getting in sync to well
> and all other equipment sync to it, get very often deny updates because
> of source out of sync. This master sync about 2 thousands other time
> devices, witch is not a
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:18:47AM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> It looks like some people are having a discussion in which they
> construct views they would find outrageous, attribute them to me, and
> then try to blame me for them.
>
> For such purposes, knowledge of my actual views might be
Can we please stop this thread now because it is
really not interesting at all.
---
Lars Hansson
On 12/10/07, Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One question particularly relevant for this list is why I don't
> recommend OpenBSD. It is not about what the system allows. (Any
> general purpose system allows doing anything at all.) It is about
> what the system suggests to the user.
On 12/10/07, Thomas Delaet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the responses! I would like to experiment with some
> custom bsd.rd's and see if I can get this to work. Is it possible to
> boot a Macbook from the network? I installed the rEFIt bootloader.
> Also, can I capture the kernel o
I've got a ServerWorks-based Fujitsu-Siemens Xeon box. At 'halt -p'
(with or without acpi) the following happens (no panic).
Any suggestions?
# halt -p
/etc/rc.shutdown in progress...
/etc/rc.shutdown complete.
sycing disks... done
Stopped at gettick+0xec: inb $0x40,%al
ddb> tr
gettick
I had some issues with my master ntp server not getting in sync to well
and all other equipment sync to it, get very often deny updates because
of source out of sync. This master sync about 2 thousands other time
devices, witch is not a big load by any mean what so ever.
Then looking at it mor
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:56:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> I noticed some crazy behavior lately,
>
> dmesg?
Sure :)
Just wanted to know if it's known. Not that I may missed a mail at misc@
or so where it was discussed and a solution presented.
--
dmesg
I recompiled (again) to ensur
On 12/10/07, L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars NoodC)n wrote:
> > In regards to RMS, I have yet to see critique of his ideas, especially n
> > the mainstream media.
>
> Some infamous 'mainstream media' critique:
> [..more of the same: ..]
> http://z505.com/GNU-Violation-Press-Release1.htm
<<>
In
It looks like some people are having a discussion in which they
construct views they would find outrageous, attribute them to me, and
then try to blame me for them.
For such purposes, knowledge of my actual views might be superfluous,
even inconvenient. However, if anyone wants to know what I do
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:56:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I noticed some crazy behavior lately,
dmesg?
Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Renaud,
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:50:36PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> | Have you actually seen these packets live on the wire ?
>
> I re-read your original mail, and it turns out you have seen these
> packets on the wire. Sorry for the too-quick-answer ;P
No prob
After reading the pearls of human thought described below, I've just
chmod 000 {L,z}505
This guy's just too smart and he's able to see things no one can
Better spend my time on a copy of Solitaire that came free
on my windows machine. :)
I do not agree 100% with Stallman. I've met with him
On 12/10/07, Joe Spenceley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently had a request from an end user wishing that the time stamp on
> any files uploaded on to the BSD FTPD will retain their original time stamp.
> Can anyone help point me in the right direction of an FTP server that can be
>
Hi Renaud,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:50:36PM +0100, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| Have you actually seen these packets live on the wire ?
I re-read your original mail, and it turns out you have seen these
packets on the wire. Sorry for the too-quick-answer ;P
| I doubt it. In general (the recommended
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 04:24:03PM +0100, Renaud Allard wrote:
| Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
| > Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| >> I just noticed that spamd is trying to send ack packets from 127.0.0.1 to
the IP
| >> of the sender when it hits the greytrap IP. I don't feel this i
On 12/10/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:57:53PM -0600, Travers Buda wrote:
> > Yes this is quite silly. Stallman insists on "free" software, and
> > distributions are only acceptable if they shove that software down
> > the users throats in the
I noticed some crazy behavior lately,
The box wich I use and where I installed current (for some days) "freezes".
Well it doesn't stop at all.
I can switch the consoles but I can't input anything (like commands).
The SSH stays open
The behavior is not related to load and it's pretty much
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 09:14:35AM -0600, Chris Eidem wrote:
> Before I submit a bug report, I want to make sure that I'm doing this right
> and that it really is the card/laptop/OS combination and not just me.
>
> I'm attempting to start a DWL-650+ on a Thinkpad A31 with the following
> command:
Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> However sending ack packets with an originating IP of 127.0.0.1 to any non
> local
> (! 127.0.0.0/8) IP shouldn't happen,
yYou're right, that is odd. My reading skills must be sligtly off
this afternoon.
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first
Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I just noticed that spamd is trying to send ack packets from 127.0.0.1 to
>> the IP
>> of the sender when it hits the greytrap IP. I don't feel this is wanted
>> behavior. Has anymone any idea of why it is doing so?
>
As usual you just said absolutely nothing. Don't you get tired of your
own drivel? We do; very very tired. Your views (whatever they are) are
incompatible here so why repeating and contorting the argument over
and over again?
Its simple you take dictionary definitions, toss them, redefine a wor
On Dec 10, 2007 5:40 AM, Khalid Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> random question. I've a sun system running obsd 4.2. I though I didn'
> have a scsi card with openfirmware so I installed on an IDE disk and
> spent ages configuring the system. It's a mail server also so I don't
> have th
Before I submit a bug report, I want to make sure that I'm doing this right
and that it really is the card/laptop/OS combination and not just me.
I'm attempting to start a DWL-650+ on a Thinkpad A31 with the following
command:
ifconfig acx0 -bssid -chan media autoselect -nwid -nwkey up
and the sy
Renaud Allard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just noticed that spamd is trying to send ack packets from 127.0.0.1 to the
> IP
> of the sender when it hits the greytrap IP. I don't feel this is wanted
> behavior. Has anymone any idea of why it is doing so?
ACK packets are part of any two-way TC
Hello,
I am running OpenBSD 4.2-stable
I just noticed that spamd is trying to send ack packets from 127.0.0.1 to the IP
of the sender when it hits the greytrap IP. I don't feel this is wanted
behavior. Has anymone any idea of why it is doing so? It doesn't seem to be due
to the "set skip on lo" as
Lars NoodC)n wrote:
In regards to RMS, I have yet to see critique of his ideas, especially n
the mainstream media.
Some infamous 'mainstream media' critique:
http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Please-Stop-Using-GNU-Licenses
http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=GNU-Software-Fr
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:15:46AM +0100, Rico Secada wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have just listed to the interview of Richard Stallman on BSDTalk:
> http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2007/10/bsdtalk132-richard-stallman.html
>
> In the interview he states: "I am unhappy with the various
> distributions of BSD,
Thanks a lot for the responses! I would like to experiment with some
custom bsd.rd's and see if I can get this to work. Is it possible to
boot a Macbook from the network? I installed the rEFIt bootloader.
Also, can I capture the kernel output?
Kind Regards
--
Thomas
Bryan S. Leaman wrote:
> OK, I'm trying to accomplish this with tags. However, ftp-proxy is
> always putting "quick" in the rules, so no further processing is done
> and my reply-to tagged rule (located after the anchor) is never matched.
>
> Would it make more sense to not use quick when -T opt
On Dec 10, 2007 6:02 PM, Mayuresh Kathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2007 5:20 PM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
> > > On Dec 10, 2007 8:14 AM, Amarendra Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> It appears that browsing Ope
On Dec 10, 2007 5:20 PM, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
> > On Dec 10, 2007 8:14 AM, Amarendra Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It appears that browsing OpenBSD src/ through cvsweb points to old
> >> src, and not the latest one. For eg.,
Tip.
Don't allow password challenge. Problem solved. Just use key'd ssh and this
problem disappears.
On 11/12/2007, Raimo Niskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a related problem, but I am not sure if the source
> IPs are nasty computers or just...
>
> # lsof -ni:www
> shows me lots of c
Karl Sjodahl - dunceor wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2007 8:14 AM, Amarendra Godbole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It appears that browsing OpenBSD src/ through cvsweb points to old
>> src, and not the latest one. For eg.,
>> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/gnu/usr.bin/ turns up many
>> u
I have a related problem, but I am not sure if the source
IPs are nasty computers or just...
# lsof -ni:www
shows me lots of connections hanging in state CLOSE_WAIT
from some hosts (often in China). These used to eat all
sockets for httpd. Now I have a max-src-conn limit so
it is not a real probl
On Dec 10, 2007, at 2:14 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote:
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:27:33PM -0800, Ray Percival wrote:
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (3B48b)
Fancy X-Mailer, but isn't non-free and full of patents ;)?
Yes, it is. Very much so. Also means I don't have to get off the
couch when I want to se
The solution has been found! The mainboard with the AMD-K6-2
had got into an undocumented multiplier which meant slightly
overclocking the processor. When keeping the 66 MHz clock setting
and producing 333 MHz processor speed instead of 400 MHz, and
where the processor was marked for 350, I ran mem
Hi,
random question. I've a sun system running obsd 4.2. I though I didn'
have a scsi card with openfirmware so I installed on an IDE disk and
spent ages configuring the system. It's a mail server also so I don't
have the time to have a few hours of down time.
How would I go about cloning
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:27:33PM -0800, Ray Percival wrote:
> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (3B48b)
>
Fancy X-Mailer, but isn't non-free and full of patents ;)?
> So, what Stallman seems to be saying is that preventing users from
> running the software they choose is more important than respecting
Hi,
I've recently had a request from an end user wishing that the time stamp on
any files uploaded on to the BSD FTPD will retain their original time stamp.
Can anyone help point me in the right direction of an FTP server that can be
configured to allow this?
Thanks,
Joe
Hiya.
I would like to use checkout with a test option (similar to -t on many
utilities).
I notice in cvs(1) that the non destructive reporting option is:
-n
I also noticed:
-t (trace).
Armed with that information I tried:
cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs -n -t checkout -P xenocara
To which I get:
-
99 matches
Mail list logo
