Lars NoodC)n wrote:
In regards to RMS, I have yet to see critique of his ideas, especially nthe mainstream media.
Some infamous 'mainstream media' critique: http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Please-Stop-Using-GNU-Licenses http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=GNU-Software-Freedom http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Closed-Source-Consulting http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Projects-Restrict-Binaries-but-Offer-Sources http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Open-Source-Service-Scared-Him http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=GNU-GPL http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Open-Source-University-Scared-Professor http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=Richard-Stallman-Charges-Money-For-Speech http://z505.com/cgi-bin/qkcont/qkcont.cgi?p=How-To-Restrict-GNU-Source-Code http://z505.com/GNU-Violation-Press-Release1.htmI still respect him, for all the useful source code he has given us. After all, BSD still uses GCC and such - and some of you use Emacs.
Regards, L505