On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > > Just came across this article:
> > > http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
> > >
> > > So is he right?
> > >
> > > -Nick
Hi friends,
I have setup a multiboot machine with 4 OSes, gentoo,NetBSD,OpenBSD(but of
course :-) and FreeBSD on a single hard disk.
Now I want to do two things.
a) Take a screenshot of the grub splash screen at bootup
b) Take a screenshot of the wdm screen
Can you guys help ou
Stephan,
> # mt -f /dev/nst0 status
> ahc0: target 1 using 16bit transfers
> ahc0: target 1 synchronous at 80.0MHz DT, offset = 0x7f
> SCSI tape drive, residual=0
> ds=3
> er=0
> blocksize: 0 (0)
> density: 0 (0)
>
>
> When doing 'dump' or 'tar' to the drive, I'll get the following after a
Hi all,
I've been trying to compile a KDE application but configure never finds
the qt3 lib. I used the --with-qt-includes and --with-qt-libs= pointing to
/usr/local/lib/qt3/{include,lib} since after a clean installation of
OpenBSD 4.0 I found qt3 there.
The first application I tried to compile wa
On 10/4/06, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Broadcom 802.11 chipsets are the bastards of the industry. They
are the most complicated and difficult to program. Broadcom's
division is not interested in helping at all.
A Linux team has managed to mostly reverse engineer a subset of
Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For desktop/server use, hardware acceleration for crypto seems
increasingly irrelevant as processors become faster. Yawn.
From a VIA PadlockACE equipped SBC:
16 bytes64 bytes 256 bytes1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128-cbc 31
I believe that is signal strength or something of the sort
Sam Fourman Jr.
On 11/4/06, Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just noticed a percentage in the output of ifconfig that I hadn't
noticed before and I haven't yet found it mentioned. This is from
-cuurent around 10/28/06.
ath0: f
I just noticed a percentage in the output of ifconfig that I hadn't
noticed before and I haven't yet found it mentioned. This is from
-cuurent around 10/28/06.
ath0: flags=8863 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:09:5b:40:7d:3c
groups: egress
media: IEEE802.11 autoselect (DS11 mode 11b)
having seen and experimented with both jose's (
http://www.monkey.org/~jose/software/stsh/ ) and dug's (
http://mirror.sg.depaul.edu/pub/security/stsh/dugsong-stsh.txt ) stsh tarballs,
i found that jose's works nicely with minimal effort and dug's throws up an
"invalid shell" error. does anyone hav
On Fri, 03 Nov 2006 08:22:28 -0800, Alexander Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Thanks, I do stand corrected.
>
>Next time I spec out firewalls, I will keep your arguments in mind for
>sure, they do make a lot of sense.
>
>Alec
Corrected? -I think a much better way to look at is your perspective h
My first reply on a mailing list, I hope this works. ;-)
First, it seems to be the same problem as in the post
"Marvell Yukon 88E8053 on Apple Mac mini (hanging system)" by
"Tasmanian Devil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Yes, my thread. I tried to email Mark Kettenis directly who wrote
about the patche
On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:55, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > > Just came across this article:
> > > http://geodsoft.com/howto/hard
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:55, Nick Guenther wrote:
> On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
> > > Just came across this article:
> > > http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
> > >
> > > So is he right?
>
On 11/4/06, STeve Andre' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
> Just came across this article:
> http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
>
> So is he right?
>
> -Nick
It seems that this was written to cover OpenBSD 2.9, and revisied
fo
On Saturday 04 November 2006 19:09, Nick Guenther wrote:
> Just came across this article:
> http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
>
> This list has made me skeptical of claims about hardening, especially
> when done independantly. In particular, the article says
> "The most interest
Nick Guenther wrote:
> Just came across this article:
> http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
>
> This list has made me skeptical of claims about hardening, especially
> when done independantly. In particular, the article says
> "The most interesting configuration choice in the def
Just came across this article:
http://geodsoft.com/howto/harden/OpenBSD/services.htm
This list has made me skeptical of claims about hardening, especially
when done independantly. In particular, the article says
"The most interesting configuration choice in the default OpenBSD
install is portmap
Hey,
I will be in Moscow in December from the 6th to the 9th and would like
to meet up with some OpenBSD users, please contact me if you have
local knowledge, especially if you know of a place called B1 in
Ordzhonikidze
Wim.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
The one I posted before was from the system that does not work.
Below are the new ones, from both systems. Situation hasn't changed
when using current snapshot.
==
This is from NOT working system:
==
OpenBSD 4
2006/11/4, Igor Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Also the dates of the errata patches are interesting - October 7,
2006. But 4.0 was released on November 1, 2006. Why this patches were
not applied to 4.0 before release was out? Are this fixes not so
Because OPENBSD_4_0 was tagged earlier. Do you
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006, Igor Goldenberg wrote:
> 2006/11/5, Martin SchrC6der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > And it did. patch 2 is the same as patch 13 for 3.9, which is exactly
> > what Mark wondered about.
>
> Also the dates of the errata patches are interesting - October 7,
> 2006. But 4.0 was releas
> 2006/11/5, Martin SchrC6der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > And it did. patch 2 is the same as patch 13 for 3.9, which is exactly
> > what Mark wondered about.
>
> Also the dates of the errata patches are interesting - October 7,
> 2006.
Those dates are wrong. The errata files came out on November
The recent request for better comments in pf.conf files
as well as #include functionality points out a basic flaw
in the input language design:
The newline delimited input without /* */ comments.
And a basic flaw in the parser/lexer:
Comment handling at parse level not lexer level.
A be
2006/11/5, Martin SchrC6der <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And it did. patch 2 is the same as patch 13 for 3.9, which is exactly
what Mark wondered about.
Also the dates of the errata patches are interesting - October 7,
2006. But 4.0 was released on November 1, 2006. Why this patches were
not applied t
Bhima,
Quoting Bhima Pandava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Interesting.
>
> I had assumed that hardware accelerators kept more or less the same
> pace of improvement as general purpose CPUs. Can you point to any
> literature that shows that it doesn't?
CPU's keep getting faster and crypto accelerator
hello
i try to set up an openbsd4.0 workstation and ran into problems with
the audio/sound setup.
i followed the 'multimedia-faq' but the audio-output is in case of
*.au files somehow 'crippeld' and in the case of
audio-cds (playing with cdio) there is no output at all.
can you give me a hint?
http://www.vendorwatch.org/index.php?title=3Ware
"3Ware has repeatedly said they will not support OpenBSD in any way.
3Ware raid controllers have basic support in OpenBSD, but are not
fully interoperable."
2006/11/3, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The web page may get an update if any of these patches have sufficient
general interest or importance.
And it did. patch 2 is the same as patch 13 for 3.9, which is exactly
what Mark wondered about.
Best
Martin
I forgot that list doesn't forward attachments, so I appended dmesg below,
and if anyone wants acpidump, let me know, I'll send it directly.
OpenBSD 4.0 (RAMDISK_CD) #39: Sat Sep 16 19:34:26 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/RAMDISK_CD
cpu0: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2500
Bor Chi (Singapore) Pte Ltd
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:26:07 + (UTC)
"Neil S. Sprinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben Calvert flyingwalrus.net> writes:
>
> >
> > my {archive,google}-fu isn't up to this task, so i have to bother
> > the list about this.
> >
> > I'm trying to get X working in more than 8bit on a 400mhz
I was wondering if there is any way to find out the status of a 3ware raid
unit from within OpenBSD. If not is the current twe driver compatible
with the 3ware tw_cli program if ran in linux or FreeBSD emulation?
Also, is development still being done on this driver or has the lack of
documentatio
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 03:44:07PM +0100, Bhima Pandava wrote:
> Interesting.
>
> I had assumed that hardware accelerators kept more or less the same
> pace of improvement as general purpose CPUs. Can you point to any
> literature that shows that it doesn't?
No, my information is merely gleaned
Just got my new OpenBSD server, including a Quantum Ultrium 3 tape drive
connected to an Adaptec AHA-29160 controller.
# mt -f /dev/nst0 status
ahc0: target 1 using 16bit transfers
ahc0: target 1 synchronous at 80.0MHz DT, offset = 0x7f
SCSI tape drive, residual=0
ds=3
er=0
blocksize: 0 (0)
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:34:45PM +0100, Bhima Pandava wrote:
> I know this had been asked before but I did not see an answer nor did
> I see an update on the relate OpenBSD web pages.
>
> What is the status of hardware encryption accelerators?
>
> I too have read the web pages and frankly they
Interesting.
I had assumed that hardware accelerators kept more or less the same
pace of improvement as general purpose CPUs. Can you point to any
literature that shows that it doesn't?
On 11/4/06, Darrin Chandler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2006 at 02:34:45PM +0100, Bhima Panda
All right then, I'll try now to give all the details possible...
First, it seems to be the same problem as in the post
"Marvell Yukon 88E8053 on Apple Mac mini (hanging system)" by
"Tasmanian Devil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
As is mentioned in the link from the above post, there's a possibility
that t
Here's an update: I tried running OpenBSD 4.0 on my desktop,
which has Marvell 88E8053, and it seems to be working just fine.
On Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:12:25 -0500
qsd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to install OpenBSD 4.0 on my laptop with
> Marvell Yukon 88E8055 Gigabit ethernet
I know this had been asked before but I did not see an answer nor did
I see an update on the relate OpenBSD web pages.
What is the status of hardware encryption accelerators?
I too have read the web pages and frankly they sound outdated or at
best old. I have the impression that some years ago
The original message was received at Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:01:37 -0600 from
[52.145.159.135]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
**
**
WARNING: WinProxy has de
On 04/11/06, Paul Pruett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I did it, finally. the promised notes:
http://www.cocoavillagepublishing.com/development/tools/openbsd/tips/cyrus-imapd/
Arrrgh!
Page width greater than 1024px.
(Sure, I can twice decrease the text size in Firefox and it will fit
on a 1024 sc
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 09:48:59PM -0800, Ben Calvert wrote:
> my {archive,google}-fu isn't up to this task, so i have to bother the
> list about this.
>
> I'm trying to get X working in more than 8bit on a 400mhz tiBook, and
> can't find a good modeline/hsync/vrefresh. Xorg -configure produces
Ben Calvert flyingwalrus.net> writes:
>
> my {archive,google}-fu isn't up to this task, so i have to bother the
> list about this.
>
> I'm trying to get X working in more than 8bit on a 400mhz tiBook, and
> can't find a good modeline/hsync/vrefresh. Xorg -configure produces
> nothing useful.
43 matches
Mail list logo
