On 2/13/06, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on
> OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it hard ?
> What's your feedback ?
Add me to the list of satisfied desktop users.
Both my worksta
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Tony Sterrett wrote:
> I'm not sure I'd do it in that way. I'm thinking if BPF provided stateful
> inspection is would be
> more useful.
Asking for stateful inspection in bpf(4) is like wanting a carburettor
for a pushbike. You might be able to shoehorn it in there, but it wo
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 06:32:53PM -0800, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > > find ./ -type f -print | xargs -i rm -f
> > > Instead of
> > > rm -f $(find ./ -type f -print)
> >
> > Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
> > probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 12:35:36AM -0500, Bill wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:16:07 +0400
> Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on
> > OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it har
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:16:07 +0400
Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on
> OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it hard ?
> What's your feedback ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bruno.
>
If y
On 2/13/06, Bruno Carnazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on
> OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it hard ?
> What's your feedback ?
>
I use WindowMaker on this OpenBSD laptop and couldn't be happ
Hi all,
I'd like to know if someone tried to build a desktop environment on
OpenBSD/i386. I think to rich desktop like Gnome or KDE. Is it hard ?
What's your feedback ?
Best regards,
Bruno.
Hi all,
Refering to : http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/archive/index.php/t-29968.html,
I've tried to install the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Linux client
v5.2.2 on OpenBSD/i386 3.8 through linux emulation. It behaves
normally, but I can't backup with the '-subdir=yes' option, it
generates a core d
Hi all,
I've tried an OpenBSD/i386 3.9-beta snapshots 2 weeks ago. It worked
perfectly until now that I have build an AP with it, with an Nintendo
USB connector. 2 times, pf died and vomit continuously things like :
Feb 11 21:31:30 puffy /bsd: pf_test: pf_get_mtag returned NULL
Feb 11 21:31:30
On Feb 13, 2006, at 5:16 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 2/13/06, Tony Sterrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking at the tradeoff of porting bpf with states from linux to
OpenBSD from linux. Daniel Hartmeier in Design and Performance of
the "OpenBSD Stateful Packet Filter (pf)" says that pf is
On 2/13/06, yary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, can one use a group name to set up a pool? eg:
> rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 80 { httpd_ifs_group }
> round-robin
just read the referenced post from Henning- looks like my answer is "yes"!
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Jason Crawford wrote:
SNIP
> He couldn't even figure out how to find the applications that use bpf,
> so I think figuring out all the features in a utility might be out of
> his grasp...
>
> Jason
hence my original suggestion, minus my "|" miscue of course.
On 14/02/2006, at 2:24 PM, Joshua Sandbrook wrote:
The thing about that though, is it assumes I already have a working
system..
eg, solaris is already installed.
Any ways around this?
I remember migrating an ultra 10 from solaris to openbsd onto the
swap partition of the solaris install,
On 2/13/06, Ray Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> In this example ifconfig(8) shows that I have groups ``lo'' and
> ``egress'', so in the pf.conf you can stick an interface group
> (almost?) anywhere you can stick an interface. (Actually there's
> a missing interface group in this example: ``en
Hi,
I've just built my home Wifi AP with an Nintendo USB Wifi Connector,
it works perfectly (support a/b/g + hostap + monitor). I run an
OpenBSD/i386 3.9-beta. The adapter is built on a Ralink chipset.
Best regards,
On 2/13/06, uv negativa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, i need so
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 11:13:17PM -0500, Ray Lai wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:26:29AM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:12PM -0500, kyle wrote:
> > > Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> > > interface ranges and how to implemen
The thing about that though, is it assumes I already have a working system..
eg, solaris is already installed.
Any ways around this?
On Sunday 12 February 2006 23:13, you wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just thought I should point out the fact that some
> > Sun systems need firmware updat
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:26:29AM +0100, Tobias Ulmer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:12PM -0500, kyle wrote:
> > Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> > interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
> > that specifies each inte
On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
> >>
> >> Time to write your own program in C instead if the time to invoke
> >> rm is taking too much time.
> >
> > No point, xargs does what I need it to do, and is much more efficient
> >
Hello,
1. I was hoping someone could recommend a dual AMD Opteron, that will
ultimately have 2-4 gigs RAM, 2 NICs, run OpenBSD 3.8, apache, pf, snort,
snortsam, snmp, mrtg, SATA (would be nice), captive portal, AAA and various
other items for a WISP. I am modeling it after the Air-Lok box fu
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> Time to write your own program in C instead if the time to invoke
> rm is taking too much time.
rm *is* a small program written in C. You need to consider how the
tools actually invoke it - think about it for a while.
-d
kyle wrote:
> Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
> that specifies each interface(tun0, tun1, tun2, etc..). If I somehow missed
> this in some documentation, please feel free to tell me to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:28:12PM -0500, kyle wrote:
> Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
> that specifies each interface(tun0, tun1, tun2, etc..). If I somehow missed
> this in some doc
On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
Time to write your own program in C instead if the time to invoke
rm is taking too much time.
No point, xargs does what I need it to do, and is much more efficient
than having find execute rm itself. The fewer times you call execve(2)
the bet
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
> > Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
> > probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
>
> Why not use -exec in find?
>
> find . -type f -name tt
On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:53 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
>
> > On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
> >>> Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
> >>
On Tuesday 14 February 2006 10:28, kyle wrote:
> Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
> interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
> that specifies each interface(tun0, tun1, tun2, etc..).
Try using "tun".
---
Lars Hansson
On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
> > Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
> > probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
>
> Why not use -exec in find?
>
> find . -type f -na
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:53 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:
On 2/13/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
Why n
On 2/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/02/13 17:28, Jason Crawford wrote:
> > Well in the case of /usr/src, I think you must MIGHT hit the maximum
> > argument length for the shell by using xargs
>
> I haven't seen xargs do the wrong thing here. Embedded spaces annoy,
> b
On Monday 13 February 2006 21:25, Damien Miller wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote:
>
> > Marco,
> >
> > I would like to add that I appreciate the work you and the rest of the
> > crew are doing to develop OpenBSD.
>
> Please show your appreciation by educating yourself using the
On 2/13/06, Damien Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why so many people is using xargs ?
> >
> > I mean for instance why bother use xargs AND a pipe to do somthing like this
> > :
> >
> > find ./ -type f -print | xargs -i rm -f
> > Instead of
> > rm -f $(find ./ -type f -print)
>
> Because that
On Feb 13, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Damien Miller wrote:
Because that will fail when there are too many arguments, and will
probably break on filenames with spaces (use xargs -0 for these).
Why not use -exec in find?
find . -type f -name ttt -exec rm {}\;
-- Pinski
Im having trouble finding out if(I'm sure it does) the pf.conf supports
interface ranges and how to implement it. Right now, I have an ugly rule
that specifies each interface(tun0, tun1, tun2, etc..). If I somehow missed
this in some documentation, please feel free to tell me to STFA or RTFM -
but
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Dave Feustel wrote:
> Marco,
>
> I would like to add that I appreciate the work you and the rest of the
> crew are doing to develop OpenBSD.
Please show your appreciation by educating yourself using the available
manpages (which represent a huge amount of work) before askin
On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, noob lenoobie wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> >(b) pipeing to xargs(1) may be faster.
>
> Why so many people is using xargs ?
>
> I mean for instance why bother use xargs AND a pipe to do somthing like this
> :
>
> find ./ -type f -print | xargs -i rm
Hi Dave,
On 2006.02.14, at 12:53 PM, Dave Feustel wrote:
Marco,
I would like to add that I appreciate the work you and the rest of the
crew are doing to develop OpenBSD.
It might be best in the future to first outline what you've done to
research your questions and then ask the question. Oth
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Matthias Kilian wrote:
>(b) pipeing to xargs(1) may be faster.
Why so many people is using xargs ?
I mean for instance why bother use xargs AND a pipe to do somthing like this
:
find ./ -type f -print | xargs -i rm -f
Instead of
rm -f $(find ./ -type f -print)
?
Richard.
Marco,
I would like to add that I appreciate the work you and the rest of the
crew are doing to develop OpenBSD.
On Monday 13 February 2006 19:36, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> http://www.oxide.org/cvs/tedu.html
> Commit Statistics:
>
> Total: 864
> src: 834 (96.528%)
> ports: 6 (0.694%)
> www:
uv negativa wrote:
Hi all,
Well, i need some help!
what is the best Wireless hardware supported on openbsd?
FCC IDs are often a good way to tell the difference if you're in the US.
http://shockley.net/wireless/listcards.aspx
Additions to this page are welcomed...
dereck wrote:
The responses here are totally out of line.
So was his last comment in
http://groups.google.com/group/lucky.openbsd.misc/msg/942c4c6d5bc26fca
On Monday 13 February 2006 19:36, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> Time for you to start using Linux, Windows or OSX.
> OpenBSD is clearly not fulfilling your needs
Your psychic abilities are failing you again.
> and the lists are unfriendly.
So What?
> http://www.oxide.org/cvs/tedu.html
> Commit St
On 2/13/06, Tony Sterrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm looking at the tradeoff of porting bpf with states from linux to
> OpenBSD from linux. Daniel Hartmeier in Design and Performance of
> the "OpenBSD Stateful Packet Filter (pf)" says that pf is more
> efficient than bpf, so it may be point
Hi and tanks all, for your help
but i think you don't have remove this card
beacuse i belive the version b of D-LINK DWL-G520 work(i haven't tried it )
well, if anybody has tried this card, could you please tell us?
On 2/13/06, Szechuan Death <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Zakelj wrote:
>
> >
I have a scheme (no pun intended) to make Standard ML97 universal and
OpenBSD
the defacto standard for voting machines. If it should succeed, it
would mean
money for OBSD development.
Naturally, I would like to see OBSD ported to SML97. In particular,
porting would be eased by the fact that S
Hey,
BPF is a really cool pseudo device (software that's access like a
device, you'll see it in /dev). It is programmed with a assembly like
load/store instruction set. This is a very efficient way of
filtering incoming packets.
It used by tcpdump, pcap and ppp. Its neat but it doesn't
Hi
i have a dell inspiron 710m and work fine, (i don't config x86 in 1280
X 800 but is fine in 1024 x 800), the wires is iwi and work fine.
bye
On 1/15/06, Julesg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want aircard support of course (which lets out DELL and a few other
> manufactuer's.)
>
> So what's th
Chris Zakelj wrote:
I am currently using a Belkin F5D7000, version 3001, as a wifi host in
my firewall. dmesg snippet:
ral0 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 "Ralink RT2560" rev 0x01: irq 12, address
00:11:50:14:f6:a0
ral0: MAC/BBP RT2560 (rev 0x04), RF RT2525
and from ifconfig:
ral0: flags=8943 mtu 1
Time for you to start using Linux, Windows or OSX.
OpenBSD is clearly not fulfilling your needs and the lists are unfriendly.
http://www.oxide.org/cvs/tedu.html
Commit Statistics:
Total: 864
src: 834 (96.528%)
ports: 6 (0.694%)
www: 24 (2.778%)
Total Days: 1095
Average per day: 0.789
Oldes
Nick Guenther gmail.com> writes:
>
> You probably want to bring the interface up before trying this:
> ifconfig wi0 nwkey up
> wicontrol -n MyWifiName -e 1
>
setting the card up with ifconfig works
> > Is the "wicontrol: SIOCSWAVELAN: Numerical argument out of domain"
> > error a normal thing?
On 2006/02/13 17:28, Jason Crawford wrote:
> Well in the case of /usr/src, I think you must MIGHT hit the maximum
> argument length for the shell by using xargs
I haven't seen xargs do the wrong thing here. Embedded spaces annoy,
but that's what -print0 (to find) and -0 (to xargs) are for. I almos
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006 15:33:24 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Can anyone confirm or deny if XF4-STABLE is broken? I've updated source
>twice and have had two failed builds of X while following FAQ5.
>
>Thanks,
>JCR
sorry for the noise -the problem was my own darn fault. I somehow
I know there is software out there to split up servers into multiple
virtual private servers (ie: partitioning) But what about the reverse?
Combine multiple physical servers to run a task with the physical
systems acting on a virtual layer as a single system.. the closest I can
come is the beowu
On 2006-02-13 18:10:53 -0500, Tim Donahue wrote:
> As done by xargs?
> > grep foo 1
> > grep foo 2
> > grep foo 3
Any arguments specified on the command line are given to the utility upon
each invocation, followed by some number of the arguments read from stan-
dard input. The uti
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 05:28:22PM -0500, Jason Crawford wrote:
> Well in the case of /usr/src, I think you must MIGHT hit the maximum
> argument length for the shell by using xargs, unless you did it inside
> of each directory in /usr/src. That and well, explaining xargs to Dave
> will end up lead
On Monday 13 February 2006 17:13, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/02/13 16:53, Jason Crawford wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Greg Thomas wrote:
SNIP
> > > > (b) pipeing to xargs(1) may be faster.
> > > why?
> >
> > grep foo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
> >
> > vs.
> >
> > grep foo 1
> > grep foo 2
> > grep foo 3
> > grep foo 4
> > grep foo 5
> > grep foo 6
> > grep foo 7
>
> One of the nice things about misc is
On 2/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/02/13 16:53, Jason Crawford wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {}
> > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
> >^(a) ^(b)
> >
> > (a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in /usr/src.
> man ksh
The point being made is that '*.[ch]' is what you want. | does not
mean "or" in a characte
On 2/13/06, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2006/02/13 16:53, Jason Crawford wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {}
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > (a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in /usr/src.
> > man ksh
>
> it's in quotes, this is handled by find, not the shell.
>
> > > (b) pipeing to xargs(1) may be faster.
> > why?
>
> grep foo 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ...
>
> vs.
>
> gr
> > then i use wicontrol to configure my wlan:
Why not make it simpler? ifconfig does all this and is
portable to other cards.
cat >> /etc/hostname.wi0 << EOF
up nwid MyWifiName nwkey 0x0
dhcp
EOF
On 2006/02/13 16:53, Jason Crawford wrote:
> On 2/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
> >^(a) ^(b)
> >
> > (a) I do
On 2/13/06, Luca Marra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to set up my wireless adapter in openbsd/macppc, it's a DWL-122 USB
> adapter and "man wi" says it's supported:
>
> The following cards are among those supported by the wi driver:
> [...]
> D-Link DWL-122 Prism-3
On 2/13/06, Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
>^(a) ^(b)
>
> (a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
>^(a) ^(b)
>
> (a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in /usr/src.
You can search for a thread on this list with the subject "how to
manage big pf-rulesets in a comfortable way" - someone posted their
makefile for adding a macro set to the start of pf rulesets.
Hi,
I've a problem with xfce, the desktop entries from
/usr/locale/share/applications aren't inserted in the system menu of
xfce. The XDG- and datadirs are defined correctly at compile time (i've
also defined them at runtime). I've no idea howto solve the problem.
Maybe it's a known issue and
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:03:27PM -0700, Diana Eichert wrote:
> find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
^(a) ^(b)
(a) I doubt there are any file names ending in a pipe symbol in /usr/src.
(b) pipeing to xargs(1) may be faster.
(SCNR)
Ciao,
Please, stop ranting on persons -- it doesn't help.
The intentions of my own replies weren't to flame D.F. to death but
just to point out that those "exploits infos" were just silly.
Period.
Neither were mine, but you are 100% right!
Case close and moving on, the party is over.
Better things
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:53:32PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Something I won't quote]
Please, stop ranting on persons -- it doesn't help.
The intentions of my own replies weren't to flame D.F. to death but
just to point out that those "exploits infos" were just silly.
Period.
EOT for me.
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What OpenBSD programs use bpf.
Oh c'mon Dave, use the tools that are given to you.
find /usr/src -name "*.[c|h]" -exec grep 'bpf.h' /dev/null {} \;
will find files that include references to bpf.
Your comments re: Ted are sad. I can't belie
Matthias Kilian wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:00:24PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > I would expect the people writing books, specially on OpenBSD to know a
> > lots more then me, so that I can learn from them, but if what
> you say is
> > true, it make me question my idea and intention o
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 14:52, Jason Crawford wrote:
> > You cannot learn all there is to know about bpf and how to effectively
> > use it in 10 minutes, so you, personally, do NOT need to use bpf at
> > all. It's what the other utilities lik
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What OpenBSD programs use bpf.
>
> tcpdump.
And there's more:
$ cd /usr/src
$ grep -lr bpf.h bin sbin usr.bin usr.sbin libexec
will give you a nice list.
-Otto
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, one thing is for certain, the caustic responders to this thread aren't
> psychic.
>
> So let's try a r e a l s i m p l e q u e s t i o n :
>
> What OpenBSD programs use bpf.
>
> Please don't try to figure out why I am asking the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 03:29:09PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> So let's try a r e a l s i m p l e q u e s t i o n :
>
> What OpenBSD programs use bpf.
I used this command, Dave:
find /usr/src -name "*.c" -exec grep bpf {} /dev/null \;
And discovered this list:
libpcap
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What OpenBSD programs use bpf.
tcpdump.
On Monday 13 February 2006 14:52, Jason Crawford wrote:
> You cannot learn all there is to know about bpf and how to effectively
> use it in 10 minutes, so you, personally, do NOT need to use bpf at
> all. It's what the other utilities like pf and tcpdump use to do what
> they do. The utilities are
uv negativa wrote:
> Hi all,
> Well, i need some help!
> what is the best Wireless hardware supported on openbsd?
>
> I think I'll buy one wireless with chipset ath, but in the manual says
>
> Revision A1 of the D-LINK DWL-G520 and DWL-G650 are based on an Intersil
> PrismGT chip and are not
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:58:19 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> seems like NUT permissions (it has it's own usernames/passwords
> to e.g. allow monitoring a UPS without allowing shutdowns) rather
> than anything on the UPS. carefully check configs/docs.
>
Because the error comes from upsmon rathe
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 13:51, dereck wrote:
> > This is getting ridiculous! The guy said he was under
> > attack.(!) What is the point of a _misc_ list anyway?
> > He's not clogging the dev list!
> >
> > The responses here are totally out
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 02:00:24PM -0500, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> I would expect the people writing books, specially on OpenBSD to know a
> lots more then me, so that I can learn from them, but if what you say is
> true, it make me question my idea and intention of buying the book to
> start wit
This is getting ridiculous! The guy said he was under
attack.(!) What is the point of a _misc_ list anyway?
He's not clogging the dev list!
The responses here are totally out of line. Haven't
any of you guys EVER had a desperate situation before?
Sheesh.
--- Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 2/13/06, Shane J Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On 2006.02.13, at 10:31 PM, Craig M wrote:
>
> > However, it has raised my suspicions to a higher level. The book is
> > copyrighted in 2003, long before I subscribed to this list and maybe
> > even heard of OpenBSD really. Thin
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dereck,
>
> Thanks for the support. However, my situation is not desparate.
> By refusing to answer a question to which he indicated he had an
> answer, Ted has left all of us hanging as to whether he *really*
> knows what the differences are
Hi all,
Well, i need some help!
what is the best Wireless hardware supported on openbsd?
I think I'll buy one wireless with chipset ath, but in the manual says
Revision A1 of the D-LINK DWL-G520 and DWL-G650 are based on an Intersil
PrismGT chip and are not supported by this driver.
and a
On Monday 13 February 2006 13:51, dereck wrote:
> This is getting ridiculous! The guy said he was under
> attack.(!) What is the point of a _misc_ list anyway?
> He's not clogging the dev list!
>
> The responses here are totally out of line. Haven't
> any of you guys EVER had a desperate situa
On 2006/02/13 13:00, Dave Feustel wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 12:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What can BPF do that PF can not?
> >
> > different things.
>
> OK, I'll bite. Such as?
> (this might be a loong, drawnout thread, but I've
Dave Feustel wrote:
What can BPF do that PF can not?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
One is a packet sniffer, one is a firewall.
However, you are not qualified to operate such tools.
Please disconnect your keyboard from your PC.
Felipe Scarel wrote:
I thought the very same thing yesterday, when he published his web site
on the list. I took a look there, and assuming everything is correct, looks
like he ported KDE and Qt to OpenBSD, which seems huge (of course he
shouldn't have done that alone.
Moreover, his job carrer i
On 2006/02/13 10:47, David Benfell wrote:
> This UPS is about 2 years old, but fairly substantial -- I can
> generally go at least 1-1/2 hours on its battery. I had the
> impression it has fairly high-end capabilities. Am I missing
> something else that would cause "master privileges" to be
> "un
On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:10:57 -0800, David Benfell wrote:
>
>
> So I tried running the driver in debug mode...
>
>
> cyberpower -a lupin1500AVR -u nutmon -D
^
This appears to b
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 12:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What can BPF do that PF can not?
> >
> > different things.
>
> OK, I'll bite. Such as?
> (this might be a loong, drawnout thread,
Hello all,
Thanks a million, to all who responded. And I think I've managed to
identify the correct tty, but...:
Broadcast Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
((not a tty)) at 9:31 ...
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 13 February 2006 12:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> > On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What can BPF do that PF can not?
> >
> > different things.
>
> OK, I'll bite. Such as?
no, if you can't read a man page, you aren
On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What can BPF do that PF can not?
>
Your questions keep getting better and better. Just curious as to
whether you've heard of Google?
1. Make an /etc/bpf.conf and see what happens. Oh, wait, I don't see
a reference to a config file in man bp
Graham Gower napisaE(a):
On 13/02/06, Didier Wiroth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If you are running the latest snapshot with x11 can you confirm the
following command gives you an error message:
setxkbmap fr_CH
Thank you for taking the time to try this, it only takes 1 or 2 seconds
to test
On Monday 13 February 2006 12:45, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On 2/13/06, Dave Feustel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What can BPF do that PF can not?
>
> different things.
OK, I'll bite. Such as?
(this might be a loong, drawnout thread, but I've got time :-))
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid
C. Bensend dixit (2006-02-13, 14:44:04):
> > $ setxkbmap fr_CH
> > Error loading new keyboard description
>
> Ditto, on i386 (Feb 8 snapshot).
Same here on
OpenBSD 3.9-beta (GENERIC) #1: Sat Feb 11 00:05:08 CET 2006
--
.--.
|
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
