On 1/17/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OSCL (OpenBSD Server Compatibilty List) is updated with this
> > information. Find it at:
> > http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html
>
> You might want to retest the DL380 G4 - I have dozens of these ru
Hello,
(I'm a compile novice)
I've recently purchased an AMD Athlon 64 x2 dual core manchester cpu.
I was planning to build a fast openbsd "build" machine with this cpu.
1) Will I be able (while running the 64bit kernel & binaries!!!) to
cross compile and build a release for the i386 32bit archit
Ipv6 allows for stateless configuration of a interface. The IEEE (aka
MAC or hardware address) is generally used to generate tentative
addresses which commonly end up being the assigned address provided
stateful addressing does not exist on the network (such as DHCP.) This
is the case in OpenBS
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Just a bit more information on this.
As I couldn't understand if that was an AMD64 issue as illogical as that might
be, I decided to put that to the test. So, I pull out an other AMD64 server
and it's running 3.8, same fsize and b
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Just a bit more information on this.
>
> As I couldn't understand if that was an AMD64 issue as illogical as that might
> be, I decided to put that to the test. So, I pull out an other AMD64 server
> and it's running 3.8, same fsize and bsize, one driv
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> All branches have VPN tunnels back to central location and
> the firewall rules
> have a pass quick over the VPN tunnels
>
> On the main location I have a
>
> pass quick log inet from to
> keep state
> I also have a
> pass quick log inet from to
> keep state
...
> Am I doing something wrong?!
yes, you are not following the advice already given to you.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-misc&m=113729912930316&w=2
James Mackinnon wrote:
> This is a second issue that I had today with my final BSD firewall
> rollout in my main center.
>
> This issue was with exchange
>
> All branches have VPN tunnels back to central location and the
> firewall rules have a pass quick over the VPN tunnels
>
> On the main loc
Just a bit more information on this.
As I couldn't understand if that was an AMD64 issue as illogical as that
might be, I decided to put that to the test. So, I pull out an other
AMD64 server and it's running 3.8, same fsize and bsize, one drive, etc.
Use rsync to mirror the content and the r
James Mackinnon wrote:
> As part of my rollout today to Openbsd in my datacenter, I had a
> little problem, well not entirely little
>
> Here is the layout
>
> 8 TS boxes
>
> ip config
> 192.168.0.20
> 192.168.0.21
> 192.168.0.22
> 192.168.0.23
> 192.168.0.24
> 192.168.0.25
> 192.168.0.26
> 192
This is a second issue that I had today with my final BSD firewall rollout in
my main center.
This issue was with exchange
All branches have VPN tunnels back to central location and the firewall rules
have a pass quick over the VPN tunnels
On the main location I have a
pass quick log inet from
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> check the jumper settings on the CDROM, you need it set to 512byte sectors,
> other wise it wont work, if there are no jumper settings for it on the drive
> then its not compatible with your system.
While this is true on sparc systems, I don't believe it is true on
spa
n function `tds_gethostbyname_r':
threadsafe.c:230: warning: control reaches end of non-void function
*** Error code 1
Stop in /tmp/freetds-0.64.dev.20060116/src/tds.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /tmp/freetds-0.64.dev.20060116/src/tds (line 433 of Makefile).
*** Error code 1
Stop in /tmp/freetds-0.
Hey all
As part of my rollout today to Openbsd in my datacenter, I had a little
problem, well not entirely little
Here is the layout
8 TS boxes
ip config
192.168.0.20
192.168.0.21
192.168.0.22
192.168.0.23
192.168.0.24
192.168.0.25
192.168.0.26
192.168.0.27
They have a Load Balance IP of 192.1
On 2006/01/16 22:27, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
> Look at this, it's look a kind of weird:
You forgot the complete dmesg. In any case, unless you're running
recent -current, reports of sensors problems are probably not very
useful at the moment.
On 2006/01/16 22:45, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
> And when I tr
also at the obp prompt run .version
OpenBSD needs a minimum of the following version
OBP_3.27.0,POST_1.1.1,OBDIAG_2.2
if your levels are below those you'll need to update the firmware
http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/advsearch.do?collection=PATCH&type=collections&queryKey5=105930&toDocument=yes
check the jumper settings on the CDROM, you need it set to 512byte sectors,
other wise it wont work, if there are no jumper settings for it on the drive
then its not compatible with your system.
Sevan
Here is my dmesg:
OpenBSD 3.8 (GENERIC) #138: Sat Sep 10 15:41:37 MDT 2005
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor ("AuthenticAMD" 586-class) 494 MHz
cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,PGE,MMX
real mem = 200908800 (196200K)
avail mem = 17644748
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Ricardo Lucas wrote:
> Any ideias?
we can't help you without a dmesg.
-d
And when I try atactl:
# atactl wd0c readattr
Attributes table revision: 4
ID Attribute name Threshold Value Raw
1 Raw Read Error Rate 102253
0x
2 Throughput Performance 127253
0x
3
Look at this, it's look a kind of weird:
hw.sensors.0=lm0, IN0, volts_dc, 2.26 V
hw.sensors.1=lm0, IN1, volts_dc, 3.94 V
hw.sensors.2=lm0, IN2, volts_dc, 2.93 V
hw.sensors.3=lm0, IN3, volts_dc, 4.67 V
hw.sensors.4=lm0, IN4, volts_dc, 0.00 V
hw.sensors.5=lm0, IN5, volts_dc, 0.00 V
hw.sensors.6=lm0
My longish question left out critical pieces- the actual /etc/ files
(pf.conf, hostname.*, bridgename.*) and tcpdump logs, I apologize.
Thanks for reading and replying despite that. I'll be going another
round tonight, and will follow up with concrete examples to the pf
list, with a brief summary h
hello:
i'm going to trayl a fw system with failover using CARP and pfsync,
the technical requirements like bit rate are to high and i would like to
know where i can find statics about how fast this solution can works
thanks beforehand
vegons
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:22:51PM -0500, Charles Farinella wrote:
> I have continual trouble installing from ports. I am under the
> impression that I cd to the proper directory in my ports tree, type make
> install and the package should install.
See FAQ 15.4.1.
>>Josh wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hello...
>>>
>>>Im trying to install openbsd 3.8 onto a sun ultra 30. The box has a scsi
>>>cdrom and a scsi hdd, and no floppy drive. I am using a cdrom burned
>>>with the small cd38.iso image to try and install with.
>>>
>>>When I boot the cdrom, it says:
>>>
>>>ok boot
Charles Farinella wrote:
I have continual trouble installing from ports. I am under the
impression that I cd to the proper directory in my ports tree, type make
install and the package should install.
In more than 50% of the cases in which I attempt this, it appears to
download and build the pa
I have continual trouble installing from ports. I am under the
impression that I cd to the proper directory in my ports tree, type make
install and the package should install.
In more than 50% of the cases in which I attempt this, it appears to
download and build the package, but towards the end
On Monday 16 January 2006 21:10, Scott Plumlee wrote:
> Trying to do the 'right thing' and not keep the compiler installed on
> the firewall. I've been copying binaries over from another system after
> it's been patched by running make -n install to see what files would be
> updated, and then copy
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
Now I agree that the difference you are seeing is larger than I would
expect. I would run a ls -laR or du -k on the filesystems and diff the
results to see if the contents are realy the same. My bet is that
you'll discover some files that are not on the system with a smaller
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:10:15PM -0500, Scott Plumlee wrote:
> Trying to do the 'right thing' and not keep the compiler installed on
> the firewall. I've been copying binaries over from another system after
> it's been patched by running make -n install to see what files would be
> updated, a
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:06:20PM -0300, Jo?o Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if I can use the ports at http://www.freshports.org/
> in my OpenBSD system.
These are FreeBSD ports. Binaries from these ports may be used in some
circumstances, see compat_freebsd(8) for details.
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 06:06:20PM -0300, Joco Salvatti wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to know if I can use the ports at http://www.freshports.org/
> in my OpenBSD system.
Well, since it says 'FreeBSD', the answer is likely no.
They might work, by virtue of Free and Open not being entirely
dissim
Ted Unangst wrote:
run du on both filesystems and compare the results.
OK, just because I am curious more then think there is a problem, and
because I am still puzzle from what Otto and Ted said, here is what I
did and the answer to question from Otto as well.
- Both system run 3.8. (www1
Trying to do the 'right thing' and not keep the compiler installed on
the firewall. I've been copying binaries over from another system after
it's been patched by running make -n install to see what files would be
updated, and then copying those files by hand.
In the case of patches that requ
Hi all,
I'd like to know if I can use the ports at http://www.freshports.org/
in my OpenBSD system.
Thanks
--
Joco Salvatti
Undergraduating in Computer Science
Federal University of Para - UFPA
web: http://salvatti.expert.com.br
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I noticed that there were a few post this month on misc@ about the
security-announce@ mailing list and the patches found under:
http://www.openbsd.org/errata.html.
A few minutes ago I saw that there were also reliability fixes available for
3.8.
I've subscribed to security-announce@ and po
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
I finally got a hold of a new Sun X4200 Opetron server. Bad news for
anybody how likes Sun hardware: our mpt(8) driver doesn't support the
SAS/SCSI controller resulting in no go condition. Everything else
seems to work.
OSCL (OpenBSD Server Compatibilty List) is updated wi
Hey guys, I'm having problem with ral0 running in hostap mode on my
openbsd box (i386, running 3.8-stable).
At the moment, the ral0 device acts as an access point and only using
mac address filtering to be able to go on the internet. So I don't
use the WEP, or IPSec, or anything like that.
run du on both filesystems and compare the results.
> Hey guys, I'm having problem with ral0 running in hostap mode on my
> openbsd box (i386, running 3.8-stable).
By running -stable, this is a choice you make.
That choice is:
Do I want to track fixes made as they head to the next
release
or
Do I want only 10-20 super-
Ok, thanks Jaochim! Gonna experiment a bit on that.
Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:38:53PM +0100, Rico wrote:
Hi,
Thanks! Don't know why I missed that.
"It is possible to define one or more fixed leases in the client
configuration file.." how exactly is this setup?
I'
From your question, I get the impression that you haven't yet read
that section. Please do so first, before asking questions. If you read
the documentation (and it shows from the question you ask), people are
usually more than happy to help.
Your impression is wrong.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 21:34:37 -0500, Nick Holland
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Josh wrote:
>> Hello...
>>
>> Im trying to install openbsd 3.8 onto a sun ultra 30. The box has a scsi
>> cdrom and a scsi hdd, and no floppy drive. I am using a cdrom burned
>> with the small cd38.iso image to try and i
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 05:38:53PM +0100, Rico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks! Don't know why I missed that.
>
> "It is possible to define one or more fixed leases in the client
> configuration file.." how exactly is this setup?
I'm afraid the laptop that held this data is rather permanently out of
co
Julesg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what's the best? Why?
I won't offer an opinion on that.
I can contribute an interesting observation, though: Whenever a
bunch of OpenBSD developers congregate, it looks like a meeting of
an IBM Thinkpad fan club.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber
Hi,
In message "which cf wifi card for a Zaurus C3100?" of <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:29:02 +0100, Maik Kuendig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can someone recommend a CF WiFi card for a Zaurus C3100?
>
> My dealer has the following cards available:
> - D-Link DCF-660W
Hi,
Thanks! Don't know why I missed that.
"It is possible to define one or more fixed leases in the client
configuration file.." how exactly is this setup?
Best regards,
Rico
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:05:55PM +0100, Rico wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to somehow setup dhclient to fallback to s
Any chance of success using a LSI MegaRAID 320-1 PCI-X board instead of
the SAS onboard?
Is there a way to connect that board directly to the backplane, in order
to keep the hotswap bays?
Thanks a lot!
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, David Gwynne wrote:
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On
Hello,
can someone recommend a CF WiFi card for a Zaurus C3100?
My dealer has the following cards available:
- D-Link DCF-660W
- Linksys WCF12-EU
by the way, can someone also recommend a network card CF or USB?
Thans and best regards
Maik
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:05:55PM +0100, Rico wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to somehow setup dhclient to fallback to some predefined
> static IP in case a dhcp server is down? I am thinking about specifying
> something with the default attribute.
See dhclient.conf(5), under 'LEASE DECLARATIO
I finally got a hold of a new Sun X4200 Opetron server. Bad news for
anybody how likes Sun hardware: our mpt(8) driver doesn't support the
SAS/SCSI controller resulting in no go condition. Everything else
seems to work.
OSCL (OpenBSD Server Compatibilty List) is updated with this
information. Find
Le 16 janv. 06 ` 12:32, Claudio Jeker a icrit :
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:30:44AM +0100, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Hi there,
Is TTL Security Check (RFC 3682) is or will be implemented on
OpenBGPd ? Or if it will not is there any good reasons (tm)(r) to not
use it ? :)
Why don't you use IPSec
On 1/14/06, Jim Razmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Replace it with an LSI MegaRAID controller and don't look back. 3Ware
> is on the same boat with Adaptec. They will not share the documentation
> the developers need to fully support their controllers. man bioctl to
> read what fully supported
On 1/16/06, Tobias Ulmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:19:01AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> > http://www.securitypipeline.com/175801169?CID=rssfeed_pl_scp
> >
> > --Siju
> >
> >
> Get the facts ;)
> http://www.osvdb.org/blog/?p=79
>
Thankyou for you response Steve :-)
And
T
I have T41 too and it works ok
(except for my iwi which loses connection often and an "Edimax EW-7128g"
PCMCIA ral card, which just won't work - maybe because of pcibios 2.1)
iwi0 at pci2 dev 2 function 0 "Intel PRO/Wireless 2200BG" rev 0x05:
irq 11, address 00:15:00:23:e2:9c
Jan 15 10:14:20 lapt
Hi,
Implemented these rewrite rules a while ago (think someone on this list
suggested it):
RewriteEngine on
# RewriteLog "logs/rewrite.log"
# RewriteLogLevel 1
RedirectMatch permanent (.*)cmd.exe(.*)$ http://www.dhs.gov
RedirectMatch permanent (.*)root.exe(.*)$ http://www.dhs.gov
Redi
Hi,
Is it possible to somehow setup dhclient to fallback to some predefined
static IP in case a dhcp server is down? I am thinking about specifying
something with the default attribute.
Or can this only be done by some kind of script?
Best regards,
Rico
On 14 jan 2006, at 14.20, James Mackinnon wrote:
Hello everyone
I have a 2 central locations which have multiple interfaces (4) and
have
tunnels for each of these interfaces to 34 other locations.. this
comes out to
approx 198 tunnels on each of these 2 systems.
Could you mail me the las
...on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 12:34:54PM +0100, Didier Wiroth wrote:
> [Sun Jan 15 20:53:24 2006] [error] [client 69.60.121.159] File does not
> exist: /htdocs/xmlsrv/xmlrpc.php
> How do "you" handle these kind of attacks?
Ignoring them, mostly. It's the attack script
of the month.
> How or wh
Hello,
My apache logs are filled with these kind of attacks:
[Sun Jan 15 20:53:19 2006] [error] [client 69.60.121.159] File does not
exist: /htdocs/drupal/xmlrpc.php
[Sun Jan 15 20:53:20 2006] [error] [client 69.60.121.159] File does not
exist: /htdocs/phpgroupware/xmlrpc.php
[Sun Jan 15 20:53:21
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:30:44AM +0100, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is TTL Security Check (RFC 3682) is or will be implemented on
> OpenBGPd ? Or if it will not is there any good reasons (tm)(r) to not
> use it ? :)
>
Why don't you use IPSec? Or as second best solution TCP MD5?
* Xavier Beaudouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-16 11:38]:
> Is TTL Security Check (RFC 3682) is or will be implemented on
> OpenBGPd ?
you cannot implement it in userland (at least not completely). It's
something that should be done sooner or later, there's code in frebsd
to grab for the kern
Hi there,
Is TTL Security Check (RFC 3682) is or will be implemented on
OpenBGPd ? Or if it will not is there any good reasons (tm)(r) to not
use it ? :)
Thanks,
/Xavier
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> > Since the bsize and fsize differ, it is expected that the used kbytes of the
> > file systems differ. Also, the inode table size will not be the same.
>
> Not sure that I would ag
64 matches
Mail list logo
