You have been successfully removed and will not receive any more messages.
On 12/22/05, Han Boetes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This problem has been bugging me for month now. It started
> happening a month after 3.8 got tagged. At least, that's when I
> started noticing it. So it might be anything. But I suspect the
> OpenBSD side the most since returning to an older Lin
I just tried installing openbsd on an old hd in the client PC and
exactly the same stuff happens.
And the suggestions made in this message also don't help a bit.
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2005-10/1663.html
# Han
On 22/12/05, eric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's something strange. I'm trying to connect from a pf gateway to an ftp
> server and it's failing in a very specific manner. Going through the pf
> gateway works fine using passive mode, but from the gateway itself using
> ftp(1) doesn't seem to wo
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:27:12 +0530, Siju George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Details of the exact kind of service package you have from your provider
>> and occasionally info on the DSL hardware you're using are needed to
>> figure out how things should be set up on your end.
>>
>
>Its a ADSL Rou
Hi,
This problem has been bugging me for month now. It started
happening a month after 3.8 got tagged. At least, that's when I
started noticing it. So it might be anything. But I suspect the
OpenBSD side the most since returning to an older Linux release on
the client from a liveCD didn't fix the
Hi
You have received a greeting card from hea345tr ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
You can preview your eCard message below:
-
Believe it or not!
Hey, guys! Check this out. Perfect place for our next ultimate adventure!
Gorgeous
On 12/22/05, J.D. Bronson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
>
> thanks
>
Check out http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/lib/libc/db/ to
see the one included with OpenBSD, and /usr/ports/databases/db/ for
other versions.
Jason
At 05:32 PM 12/22/2005, Ted Unangst wrote:
On 12/22/05, steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> > How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
look in cvs. the answer is 1.85 plus some of 1.86 plus som
On 12/22/05, steven mestdagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> > How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
look in cvs. the answer is 1.85 plus some of 1.86 plus some other patches.
> see FAQ 15.2.3.
not so u
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 05:10:56PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
> How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
see FAQ 15.2.3.
--
steven
Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
How can I tell what version the BDB is that comes within OpenBSD 3.8?
thanks
-JD
Hello,
I used to change the behavior of my keyboard with
/etc/wsconsctl.conf:
keyboard.repeat.del1=200# change keyboard repeat/delay
keyboard.repeat.deln=40
Now I plugged it to usb (see dmesg) - but from then on I am not able
to change the behavior anymore with wsconsctl. I am not sure but
Hello Robert,
Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 4:20:28 PM, you wrote:
RCW> Would adding the line:
RCW> supercede domain-name-servers "dns.IP.address.1 dns.IP.address.2";
RCW> ...do the job of hardcoding:
RCW> nameserver dns.IP.address.1
RCW> nameserver dns.IP.address.2
RCW> ...into the 'resolv.c
Are you using PPPoE for connecting to your ISP?
I don't want to waste your time with suggestions about PPPoE-related
troubleshooting if that is not appropriate. I mention this because the only
comparable routing entries that I have seen (to what you describe in your
email) is with tun devices. It
Here's something strange. I'm trying to connect from a pf gateway to an ftp
server and it's failing in a very specific manner. Going through the pf
gateway works fine using passive mode, but from the gateway itself using
ftp(1) doesn't seem to work.
Observe:
$ ftp ftp.example.org
[ login as anon
On 12/22/05, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > IP - 209.216.76.1
> > > Netmask - 255.255.255.252
> > > GW - 209.216.77.6
> > >
> > Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
> > gateway IP does not belong to the cur
On 12/22/05, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > IP - 209.216.76.1
> > > Netmask - 255.255.255.252
> > > GW - 209.216.77.6
> > >
> > Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
> > gateway IP does not belong to the cur
On Thursday 22 December 2005 14:46, Chris Smith wrote:
> GW - 209.216.77.6
Oops...I read that as 209.216.76.6 and not 209.216.77.6, so your netmask
would have to be different than what I suggested.
Do you have another network device?
The gateway address is usually the address that your system u
On 12/22/05, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > IP - 209.216.76.1
> > > Netmask - 255.255.255.252
> > > GW - 209.216.77.6
> > >
> > Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
> > gateway IP does not belong to the
martin wrote:
--- Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IP - 209.216.76.1
Netmask - 255.255.255.252
GW - 209.216.77.6
Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you assigned to
your
external IP. I have a feelin
--- Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IP - 209.216.76.1
> > Netmask - 255.255.255.252
> > GW - 209.216.77.6
> >
> Either a typo in your netmask, or a typo in your gateway, since your
> gateway IP does not belong to the current netmask you assigned to
> your
> external IP. I have a fee
On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:12, you wrote:
> It comes back with "no route to host" and when I do
> a nestat -rn, the Gateway is missing even though /etc/mygate exists.
>
> IP - 209.216.76.1
> Netmask - 255.255.255.252
> GW - 209.216.77.6
How do you get to the gateway? It isn't on the subnet.
On 12/22/05, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've been running other firewalls on this IP address with the same
> settings in the past, but am having problems setting up the Gateway
> with OpenBSD 3.8. It comes back with "no route to host" and when I do
> a nestat -rn, the Gateway
On 12/22/05, martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I've been running other firewalls on this IP address with the same
> settings in the past, but am having problems setting up the Gateway
> with OpenBSD 3.8. It comes back with "no route to host" and when I do
> a nestat -rn, the Gateway
Hello.
I've been running other firewalls on this IP address with the same
settings in the past, but am having problems setting up the Gateway
with OpenBSD 3.8. It comes back with "no route to host" and when I do
a nestat -rn, the Gateway is missing even though /etc/mygate exists.
IP - 209.216.7
On Thu, 22 Dec 2005, Graham Toal wrote:
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
I hope this
Quoting from: http://www.onlamp.com/lpt/a/6384
The biggest drawback of svnd is its lack of security in the general use case.
It is vulnerable to an offline dictionary attack. That is, you can generate a
database mapping known ciphertext blocks on the disk back into pass phrases
that can be acc
Downey Savings - Welcome To A Friendlier Easier Way Of Banking
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
You have added [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a new email address for your
Downey Online Banking.
If you did not authorize this change or if you need assistance with your
account, please contact Downey Savings customer service
On 12/22/05, Graham Toal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
> > Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
> > hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
> > downloads.
> > Not bad for o
Hi,
At home, I have your working target :)
I use an OBSD/i386 3.8 box connected to an ADSL router, but configured
in bridge mode (modem-only). If you use a router, you don't have to
configure PPPoE on your OBSD. If you use a bridge (seems to be your
case), you need to configure PPPoE on your OBS
> Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
> Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
> hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
> downloads.
> Not bad for only a few days.
I hope this isn't too OT for this list, but..
hi
this days i was doing that debuging the firewall
i do this
i put log in each rule i ant to debug
then i pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
then
pfctl -s rules > /home/david/rules.txt
then
tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0
you can look in the PF pdf for all the filter options
now try each rule and you will s
Joachim Schipper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I like to macro pretty much every variable that is used in more than one
> place (i.e., hostnames, ports, etc; hostnames are especially likely to
> be re-re-re-...-used).
That is very good advice. I tend to advocate that myself.
> If you choose goo
Just an update on the popularity of the OpenBSD 3.8 VM image:
Since it was posted on Dec 19 (4 days ago), apache logs have shown 2826
hits on the file with just over 277 gigs of traffic created by those
downloads.
Not bad for only a few days.
--
Will Backman - Network Administrator
Coastal Enterpri
Nick Ryan wrote:
We have a problem getting mail from gmail through spamd. Google's gmail
public mail service use a large number of smtp servers. The first time
In addition to that, they also appear to be retrying either too fast or
too slow ... *sigh*
rdr pass on $EXT_IF inet proto tcp from
Reza Muhammad wrote:
"C Compiler cannot create executable" ?
what does it mean ?
It can mean a lot of things, and since this looks like a message from a
configure script, it might be the same issue that happened to me once.
Check your environment variables -- for example, a
CPPFLAGS="/usr/l
Thx a lot for replying.
Hmm, I'm a bit lost now ...
Why do I have to move the anchor "before" the block statement?
Actually (without moving) the anchor authpf works well and no traffic is
blocked.
Having a look here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/authpf.html the anchor is at the bottom too, of
El Jueves, 22 de Diciembre de 2005 14:35, escribis:
> hi
> i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
> some tip?
>
Look at /etc/ssh/sshd_config and man ssh
> thanks
> David
--
Abel Talaversn Estevez
Ingeniero Superior de Telecomunicaciones
Analista de Proyectos
OpenWired
David fire wrote:
>hi
>i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
>some tip?
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?q=disable+root+login+ssh
Behold the power of the internets.
Ryan
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type APPLICATION/DEFANGED which had a
name of rfox.1649
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:35:12AM -0300, David fire wrote:
> hi
> i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
> some tip?
man sshd_config
Look for PermitRootLogin
Bernd
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had
a name of signature.as
hi
i was looking how to disable remote root login but i cant find it
some tip?
thanks
David
El Jueves, 22 de Diciembre de 2005 13:37, escribis:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to load/unload an "emule" anchor when needed.
> Unfortunately it does not work as expected as ort tcp 4662 traffic coming
> back to my router is still blocked.
> Dec 22 13:05:36.720276 rule 2/(match) block in on pppoe0:
> 80
Hi,
I would like to load/unload an "emule" anchor when needed.
Unfortunately it does not work as expected as ort tcp 4662 traffic coming back
to my router is still blocked.
Dec 22 13:05:36.720276 rule 2/(match) block in on pppoe0: 80.239.200.108.34965 >
158.64.125.147.4662: [|tcp] (DF)
Dec 22 13:0
hi Siju,
Siju George wrote:
so the DSL Router is working and the username and password is correct.
What could be the problem?
If it is a DSL _router_ you just have to setup a normal network, PPPoE
is handled by the router.
If it is a DSL _modem_ you have to setup PPPoE.
mfG
--> stefan <--
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 03:11:57AM +, pedro la peu wrote:
> > I work for an ISP
>
> It shows. Disagree off-list please.
>
If you insult someone on list, expect the same back, on list, you coward.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 10:26:38PM -0700, Ludwig Mises wrote:
> It seems that only root can access /dev/rcd0c when using tools such as
> cdrdao, cdda2wav and cdparanoia, even when the user is in the operator
> group:
>
> $ cdparanoia -v -d /dev/rcd0c -B
>
> Checking /dev/rcd0c for cdrom...
>
"J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since I don't have the skill to fix it myself, my goal is simply to
> figure out when "The" alpha bug entered the tree. If I can just figure
> out the `when' hopefully someone a lot smarter than me can figure out
> the `what' of the problem. Basically I
On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 12:13:54 -0800, "J.C. Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>I found something interesting, namely a (more than once)
>reported bug that looks very similar to "The" alpha bug. The primary
>difference is you get "cpu_switch_queuescan" rather than "cpu_switch" in
>the trace output.
49 matches
Mail list logo
