Sophie Laurie wrote:
The only thing that spoils OpenBSD is theo de raadt
But it caters so well the needs for all the worst nastiest
anal-carotid-constriction-software-patent-loving-spam-your-grandma-
for-a-dollar-bottom-feeding-killing-babies-in-palestine-and-iraq
type organizations to be able
Second that.
Just ignore personal mails sent to misc@, theo is perfectly capable of
answering mails, if he wish to.
Lets try to keep the signal to noise ration on a decent level, keep OT mails
off-list.
Cheers,
/jkm
* Kevin R ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [snip]
> > The only thing that spoils
Do we really have to go through this crap again?
EOF plzkthx.
--
Bryan Allen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bda.mirrorshades.net
Cyberpunk is dead. Long live cyberpunk.
Ok, I decided to switch from using a little Linksys 802.11b parallel
print server to using my OpenBSD box for printing to my one printer.
Printing locally works fine but I'm having trouble printing from XP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ethant# cat /etc/printcap
# $OpenBSD: printcap,v 1.4 2003/03
Oh, fun.
Sophie Laurie wrote:
She's a wheelchair bound 65 year old woman who only wanted your help and
instead, all she got was verbally assaulted by you and some of the
others. She did nothing wrong and you intentionally misinterpreted what
she
said just so you could take the opportunity to abu
On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 13:18:02 +1100, Sophie Laurie proclaimed...
> I've seen the emails that you and some of the others have sent my
> Mother, Sophia, in her inbox. Remember her, or have you pickled your
> brain to such a degree with alcohol that you can't remember?
Did you know your mother marr
[snip]
> The only thing that spoils OpenBSD is ...
This is a good example of a thread unnecessarily getting out of control.
How about everyone following a few simple guidelines:
1. Read the entire FAQ before posting
2. If a message is poorly posted for reasons like:
- you should have read the F
She went her anger, just leave it!
Theo doesn't need advocates to reply - if he wants too!
Errare humanum est, perseverare autem diabolicum!
Ioan
>>> ober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 02/12/2005 04:13:21 pm >>>
Maybe you should get your mom off of OpenBSD and onto
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Living/story?
Maybe you should get your mom off of OpenBSD and onto
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Living/story?id=235788&page=1
.2cents
-Ober
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 13:18:02 +1100
From: Sophie Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "misc@openb
Sophie Laurie wrote:
>
>
> theo,
>
>
> Coming from Canada, have you ever skated on thin ice? Well, you're doing
> it now!
I've lived in Canada. Nine months of winter and three months of bad skating
is just a myth.
> She's a wheelchair bound 65 year old woman who only wanted your help and
Same age,
I recently purchased a pair of Iron Systems A210 servers for a
firewall installation. The systems were ordered with no hard drives
and ide-to-CF adapters onboard. They are running 3.8 -release on
512MB compact flash (SanDisk SDCFB-512). I'm seeing the following
error in the same place on
theo,
Coming from Canada, have you ever skated on thin ice? Well, you're doing
it now!
I've seen the emails tha
Martmn Coco wrote:
...
>> The oddity is you have the flash on the SECOND disk channel. That
>> should work, but a buggy BIOS might get in the way.
>>
>
> I tried to move it to the first channel, but the speed problem was still
> there when booting:
bah. :)
...
>> I see you have a P4. Could t
L. V. Lammert wrote:
> Had a NIC fail last Monday at a remote site, after a local storm. We have
> had problems with this site before - apparently the building was built on
> the 'cheap' and they didn't do a lot of nice electrical stuff like
> grounding the structure!
there are other things tha
I ran into something w/ squirrelmail on openBSD 3.8
with uw imap needing plain text login and with a php
bug causing timeouts
short answer - use flavor "plaintext" with imap-uw instead
of trying edit of /etc/c-client.cf - and use imap serverside
sort option on squirrelmail - or manually update/
On 11/28/05, Federico Giannici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> eric wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 12:59:18 +0100, Federico Giannici proclaimed...
> >
> >
> >>Isn't "ttyC0" the console? I'm sure that nobody is trying to log from
> >>the console...
> >
> >
> > It is the first virtual terminal on x86
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:53:36PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
wow. what fucked up equipment is that? tell us so we can avoid it :)
Alloy. We call them 'Annoy'. :-(
Anyway, we now appear to have working switches of a different brand.
Thanks, all.
--
Christopher Vance
But isn't APCD only for APC Smart UPSes?
-Original Message-
From: Roy Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:53 PM
To: Tomaz Markelj
Subject: RE: Fully configurable UPS daemon
apcd? - works for us
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [
The thing is, I don't have APC ups, so I need something that I could
manually set DUMB signals monitoring on the daemon, NUT didn't work good...
-Original Message-
From: Roy Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 10:53 PM
To: Tomaz Markelj
Subject: RE: Fully c
On 12/2/05, jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:36:24PM +0200, turha turha wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm trying to find out if it's possible to get multiple IP's using DHCP
> to a
> > single NIC.
>
> without knowing what the specifics of the DHCP-situation on
On 2005/12/01 11:40:13, Sean Comeau wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:18:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > --On 01 December 2005 05:02 -0800, Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno wrote:
> >
> > >http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&;
> > >ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
> >
On 12/1/05, Jason Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/1/05, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am trying to get the latest OpenBSD HEAD (-current) of the CVS
> > repository (RCS ,v files) using cvsup. But it is old.
> >
> > My retrieved CVSROOT/ChangeLog goes up to 2005/05/03 2
On 12/1/05, Jeremy C. Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am trying to get the latest OpenBSD HEAD (-current) of the CVS
> repository (RCS ,v files) using cvsup. But it is old.
>
> My retrieved CVSROOT/ChangeLog goes up to 2005/05/03 23:12:53
>
> CVSROOT/config and CVSROOT/options has:
>
> tag=Open
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 10:07:28PM +0100, Alexander Farber wrote:
> On 12/1/05, Zachery Hostens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > he is saying use a random key for the disk. and encrypt this key with your
> > password. so changing your account password you just have to re-encrypt
> > the disk key.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> A stab in the dark.
> Which card in which slot does matter sometimes
> Possible that the video and the nic do not like each other.
> A firewall implies at least 2 nics. Do you see both?
> Which order?
>
>
In any slot, i have the same problems. I didn't changed the vga
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 05:36:24PM +0200, turha turha wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to find out if it's possible to get multiple IP's using DHCP to a
> single NIC.
without knowing what the specifics of the DHCP-situation on the ISP's
end is, perhaps a safe assumption is that you're going to nee
I am trying to get the latest OpenBSD HEAD (-current) of the CVS
repository (RCS ,v files) using cvsup. But it is old.
My retrieved CVSROOT/ChangeLog goes up to 2005/05/03 23:12:53
CVSROOT/config and CVSROOT/options has:
tag=OpenBSD
umask=002
dlimit=49152
Have tried cvsup.jp.OpenBSD.org and c
Now I tried rt.fm and it is up-to-date. I now have new files.
Maybe someone can go through http://www.openbsd.org/cvsup.html and check
which servers are up-to-date and either remove or add notes indicating
this.
Jeremy C. Reed
Media Relations and Publishing Services
>On 12/1/05, Zachery Hostens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> he is saying use a random key for the disk. and encrypt this key
with your
>+password. so changing your account password you just have to
re-encrypt the
>+disk key.
>
>oh, like putting it in the gecos field? that'd be kinda cool.
Yes
Had a NIC fail last Monday at a remote site, after a local storm. We have
had problems with this site before - apparently the building was built on
the 'cheap' and they didn't do a lot of nice electrical stuff like
grounding the structure!
When I got there and looked at the server, I found thi
Hello all!
I've been having problems with setting a NUT ups daemon up, it always says
On Battery (manualy configured the power/line flags, RTS,DCD... - dumb
signaling)
Now i ask the community, is there maybe a fully configurable UPS daemon for
openbsd?
Regards,
On 12/1/05, Zachery Hostens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he is saying use a random key for the disk. and encrypt this key with your
> password. so changing your account password you just have to re-encrypt the
> disk key.
Where will that random disk key be kept?
And isn't user password encryp
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
Borghi Toscani | E - mail | Registrati | Inserisci un locale | Meteo |
News
[IMAGE]
NUOVI
INSERIMENTI
Newsletter della 48B0 settimana 2005
LINK
CONSIGLIATI
Borgo Dolciano
LAST MINUTE IN TOSCANA
OFFERTE SOGGIORNI IN TOSCANA
LAST MINUTE FIRENZE
NEW WEB SITE ABETONE.COM
MUL
> >I thought about a way of de-/encrypting home-directories transparently to
> >users. I've got a vague idea how to realize this in a reasonable way:
Excally I would like to see it in way, that when OpenBSD boots up, you must
enter encryption password, and then everything mounts etc.
Of course th
On 12/1/05, Zachery Hostens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> he is saying use a random key for the disk. and encrypt this key with your
> password. so changing your account password you just have to re-encrypt the
> disk key.
oh, like putting it in the gecos field? that'd be kinda cool.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:18:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 01 December 2005 05:02 -0800, Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno wrote:
>
> >http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&;
> >ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
>
> "The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet
put it in a different slot.
On 12/1/05, Giancarlo Razzolini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>First of all, i would like to congratulate all the openbsd developers,
> because it's a very good OS. I'm a newcomer, from the Linux world,
> precisely slackware. I haven't found much prob
Try putting the card on the first controller and turning off the second
controller.
Johan
On 12/1/05, Martmn Coco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> First of all, thanks for all your input!
>
> My comments below:
>
> Nick Holland escribis:
> > Martmn Coco wrote:
> >
> >>Hi there,
> >>
> >>W
he is saying use a random key for the disk. and encrypt this key with your
password. so changing your account password you just have to re-encrypt the
disk key.
kind of like your passwd protected gpg private key.
- Zac
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:14:59 -0800, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Hi Folks,
First of all, i would like to congratulate all the openbsd developers,
because it's a very good OS. I'm a newcomer, from the Linux world,
precisely slackware. I haven't found much problem adapting myself to
OpenBSD, thankful to the excelent man pages, FAQ's, HOWTO's and mailing
l
On 12/1/05, dreamwvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I thought about a way of de-/encrypting home-directories transparently to
> >users. I've got a vague idea how to realize this in a reasonable way:
> >
> >* Generate a key, associate it with a new svnd-image, prepare the image
> >* Encrypt the
On 11/30/05, Martmn Coco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We installed the OpenBSD 3.8 using a SanDisk 1.0GB CompactFlash on a
> Pentium 4 (dmesg at the end of this message). The installation finished
> flawlessly. But when booting, it seems to take ages to boot. The last
> time we checked, it took abo
>I thought about a way of de-/encrypting home-directories transparently to
>users. I've got a vague idea how to realize this in a reasonable way:
>
>* Generate a key, associate it with a new svnd-image, prepare the image
>* Encrypt the key with the users login password, store it in /home
>* On log
Nick,
First of all, thanks for all your input!
My comments below:
Nick Holland escribis:
Martmn Coco wrote:
Hi there,
We are beginning to do some tests with Compact Flash IDE adapters and
OpenBSD 3.8.
We installed the OpenBSD 3.8 using a SanDisk 1.0GB CompactFlash on a
Pentium 4 (dmesg
Hello,
I tried to install a few machines with OpenBSD/hppa 3.8 without success.
In the past I installed them with OpenBSD 3.6, switched them the hard
way to use the serial console (using machine) and threw away the
horrible big and noisy (and compatible :/) screens.
When I boot the lif38.fs imag
Let's take this of misc@ since it s generating too much noise.
If there are other folks that are interested in progress on this send me an
email off list.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:27:04AM -0800, J.C. Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:28:53 -0600, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrot
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 00:23:27 -0500
Jean-Christophe Sicard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi misc,
>
> I'm trying to setup a pair of carp'ed firewalls on a cablemodem
> connection with a single dhcp'ed IP.
> The carp setup was a breeze on the internal interfaces where I have free
> reing on IPs, b
* Christopher Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-01 06:50]:
> My issue is that the managed switches we currently use (chosen before
> I arrived...) suppress traffic from 'duplicate' MAC addresses, clamped
> for a minimum of 300s. Both fw* think they're master.
wow. what fucked up equipment is tha
Lars Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:37:48 -0500
Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like HP? Of course, I wouldn't pay for their level of OpenSSH "support".
The level of support, or lack thereof, is not issue. It's not really about
getting any kind of support at all.
It's all
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:28:53 -0600, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please try this kernel and report back to me.
>http://www.peereboom.us/bsd.ami
>
>This is a backport of the pass-through work around for older cards
>based on 3.8-stable..
Now this is very strange... As you can see
On 12/1/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As for some time, the size limit was on
> 8,2G, but according to a documentation that was posted at undeadly.org,
> this limitation doesn't exist anymore. I haven't verified it myself,
> though.
A 140 gig file seems to work fine here:
gat
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:28:53 -0600, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please try this kernel and report back to me.
>http://www.peereboom.us/bsd.ami
>
>This is a backport of the pass-through work around for older cards
>based on 3.8-stable..
I added a temporary IDE disk to the system
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 13:18:41 +, Stuart Henderson proclaimed...
> "The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet Filter (PF)"
> that's just sick..!
Why is that sick? Are you some open source evangelist who can't see the
benefits of bringing the technology in OpenBSD to the masses?
Hi!
I'm trying to find out if it's possible to get multiple IP's using DHCP to a
single NIC.
The reason for this is that I have a small network, which I want to connect
to Internet thru an ADSL, the IP's on this ISP are dynamic, so DHCP must be
used. Reason for getting multiple IP's is so that I
No that was a weird one out that uses i2c instead.
On Dec 1, 2005, at 12:31 AM, Lars Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:53:04 -0600
Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am talking stuff like PowerEdge 2100, 2200, 4100, 4200 etc.
Does 1550 count?
---
Lars Hansson
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 23:06:18 -0500, Alex Kirk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The first thing I need to do is test patches for Marco. After we know
>> things work correctly with "normal" hardware and firmware, then I can
>> satisfy my curiosity and go mucking about with the firmware to see what
>> h
>http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&;
>ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
> >
> > "The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet Filter (PF)"
> > that's just sick..!
I wanted to make one point about this.
pf is a small part of the whole system they are making available
> I agree. This falls under the philosophy the more secure the machines
> out there in the wild (even if it is a ghastly thing known as
> Windows), the better off I we are. If they use OpenBSD based
> technologies to help with security more power to them.
>
> _Raju
>
> On 12/1/05, Nick Holland <[
I agree. This falls under the philosophy the more secure the machines
out there in the wild (even if it is a ghastly thing known as
Windows), the better off I we are. If they use OpenBSD based
technologies to help with security more power to them.
_Raju
On 12/1/05, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> a. what is svnd? (srry :x)
The Vnode disk driver. See man vnd.
> 2. what fs is mountable and dynamic in size?
>your suggesting mounting each seperate users home on login, though this
> would (based on all of my knowledge of current filesystems) that it
> would have to be of a static size.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 01:18:41PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> --On 01 December 2005 05:02 -0800, Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno wrote:
>
> >http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&;
> >ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
>
> "The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet
--On 01 December 2005 05:02 -0800, Diego Fernando Nieto Moreno wrote:
http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&;
ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
"The firewall is a Windows port of OpenBSD's Packet Filter (PF)"
that's just sick..!
--On 01 December 2005 13:19 +0100, Tomaz Markelj wrote:
I changed the rl0 inet ip to 10.0.0.1 so it's not the same, but:
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote 193.2.1.66 64 chars, ret=-1
I'd try it with the interface just "up" (no IP address), rebooting may
be the simplest way.
suggestions?
since upgrading to openbsd 3.8
I noted my spamd was not blocking, looked closer and with me
using the CBL table (huge) trying
spamd-setup gave this response:
pfctl Cannot allocate memory
The spamd is loading okay so long as I don't use a whopper
table like the CBL,
rsync://rsync.c
Hello,
Greetings from Colombia
in
http://force.coresecurity.com/index.php?module=articles&func=display&ptid=10&catid=39&aid=16
I found an Interesting Article about a Endpoint security solution for Windows
where their Firewall is Based in OpenBSD PF.
It's can be a reference for the "Products B
I changed the rl0 inet ip to 10.0.0.1 so it's not the same, but:
64 bytes from 193.2.1.66: icmp_seq=10 ttl=58 time=107.013 ms
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote 193.2.1.66 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote 193.2.1.66 64 chars, ret=-1
64 bytes fr
I was wondering what the powers-that-be think of the new sendmail X license,
now that it has been released.
Is it free enough that it may be supported in a future version of OpenBSD?
Or should I look to an alternative?
Thanks
--- Paul.
..also you might want to look at pppoe(4) "man 4 pppoe" which is
kernel-ppp, which has less overhead than pppoe(8).
--On 01 December 2005 12:45 +0100, Tomaz Markelj wrote:
I connect my OpenBSD box to the internet wia PPPoE
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet 193.77.34.220 netmask 0x broadcast 193.77.34.220
tun0: flags=8011 mtu 1492
inet 193.77.34.220 --> 213.250.19.90 netmask 0x
I
I connect my OpenBSD box to the internet wia PPPoE
# ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33224
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6
fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:06:29:73:4e:0d
Just addon:
>From OpenBSD box i get (when traffic)
64 bytes from 193.2.1.66: icmp_seq=12 ttl=58 time=34.828 ms
64 bytes from 193.2.1.66: icmp_seq=13 ttl=58 time=60.581 ms
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping: wrote 193.2.1.66 64 chars, ret=-1
ping: sendto: No buffer space available
ping:
Hello all,
I just put OpenBSD 3.8 (fresh install) on my IBM Netfinity 3000 server, and
I'm experiencing some funny things.
When the connection is idle (no torrent traffic, no msn,ftp and so on),
pings from my country servers are ok:
>From a Windows workstation behind NAT:
Reply from 193.2.1.66
On 01/12/05, Christopher Vance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:08:27AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
> >> Which managed switch brands behave right with carp, allowing traffic from
> >> carp source addresses on multiple ports without duplicate suppression?
> >
> >"duplicate sup
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:08:27AM +, tony sarendal wrote:
Which managed switch brands behave right with carp, allowing traffic from
carp source addresses on multiple ports without duplicate suppression?
"duplicate suppression", makes the lack of per-vlan mac-address tables
sound like a fea
yes, you can. You need to encrypt traffic from/to your laptop to
0.0.0.0/0. So instead of using your gw address, use 0.0.0.0/0.
HJ.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 08:00:38AM +0100, raff wrote:
> Hi,
> I have wireless connection between my machine and router/gateway.
> I can set up ipsec connection bet
Hello,
I 'm trying to install OBSD 3.8 on a Dell Poweredge 750 server using the Card
DRAC III/XT (provides remote console/screen).
But each time a ket is pushed I have the letter repetead on the console.
I have put the last firmware for the DRAC Card.
I have search by didn't find any answer
> My issue is that the managed switches we currently use (chosen before
> I arrived...) suppress traffic from 'duplicate' MAC addresses, clamped
> for a minimum of 300s. Both fw* think they're master.
>
> Which managed switch brands behave right with carp, allowing traffic from
> carp source addre
77 matches
Mail list logo
