Lars Hansson wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:37:48 -0500
Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Like HP? Of course, I wouldn't pay for their level of OpenSSH "support".
The level of support, or lack thereof, is not issue. It's not really about
getting any kind of support at all.
It's all about (middle) management covering their backs and making sure
there's someone outside the company to blame when the shit hits the fan.
You pay someone to be your scapegoat.
It's a sad state of affairs but that's how it often is.
I do not mean to insult anyone but I just want to chime in here and say
that even though I am very grateful to have OpenSSH, SSH.com's product
is not bad.
The commercial version supports a lot of different complex environments,
does more and therefore costs more. For example, there might be many
here who may not want X.509 certs in LDAP/OCSP for network
authentication but there are sites that do. Overall, SSH.coms' support
is good and their product rock solid (the same for OpenSSH).
My 2 cents.
-Bruno
