http://news.com.com/India+eyes+own+open-source+license/2100-7344_3-5701861.html?tag=nefd.led
Thankyou so much
Kind Regards
Siju
> on the topic, after reyk's talk andphk bullshitting, greg lehey let us
> know that "phk is not speaking for freebsd".
At the presentation.
In the crowd.
So who is speaking for FreeBSD?
Is it phk and all the freebsd developers sending me hate mail for
exposing this?
Like Scott Long? No wond
on the topic, after reyk's talk andphk bullshitting, greg lehey let us
know that "phk is not speaking for freebsd".
Is anyone using IKE mode config successfully with isakmpd? I'm trying to
set my VPN Tracker client (Mac IPSec software) to obtain an IP via
IKECFG but one end isn't handling things correctly. Running an isakmpd
build from today. I assume this isakmpd log snippet is relevant:
213528.813236 Cryp
On 5/15/05, Joel Dinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, please. I was there, and I believe everyone's answer was 'Stop
> trolling you damn trolling troll, this is a *technical* conference'.
> Man, what a flamebait that was. At least I had a bit of fun watching
> Henning and Beck rip our beloved Mr.
Joel Dinel wrote:
On 5/15/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Asked directly if they thought they could defend their reverse
engineering of for instance the Atheros HAL. The answer as I heard
it was "Laws don't apply to us".
Oh, please. I was there, and I believe everyone's answe
Dengan Hormat,
Terima kasih Anda telah menghubungi Centrin Online TBK.
Surat/Pertanyaan Anda akan kami proses dan akan kami balas dalam waktu
2x24 jam. (Kecuali hari Sabtu, Minggu dan hari raya). Apabila Anda tidak
mendapatkan jawaban dalam waktu 3x24 jam, mohon menghubungi email
[EMAIL
Thank you for sending an e-mail message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] However, this is
not a monitored e-mail address.
Sign in to your Hotmail account and click "Help" for the most up-to-date
information on this issue as well as recent customer questions. If you need
more assistance, you can contact us
Phillip,
Thank you for pointing out spamlogd. I never noticed that before and
will look into that tomorrow. It looks to be what I might be looking
for.
Thanks again,
Chad
On 5/15/05, Theo de Raadt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Asked directly if they thought they could defend their reverse
> engineering of for instance the Atheros HAL. The answer as I heard
> it was "Laws don't apply to us".
Oh, please. I was there, and I believe everyone's answer was 'Stop
trollin
> With the upcoming 3.7 release, I took a look at the -current manpage for
> pppoe(4). It looks straight-forward enough once you have things set up,
> but I didn't see answers to two things on my mind...
> 1. Will users be able to use it during floppy installs, or will an
> intermediate device
With the upcoming 3.7 release, I took a look at the -current manpage for
pppoe(4). It looks straight-forward enough once you have things set up,
but I didn't see answers to two things on my mind...
1. Will users be able to use it during floppy installs, or will an
intermediate device (cdrom, n
I'm having a funny problem with smtp-milter.
It has to do with sendmail running kicking off every 30 minutes (I
think) and flushing the queue
anyway here is what shows up in the logs...
May 14 10:30:01 maildev sm-mta[3232]: j4EHU1fL003232: from=<>,
size=110771, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=<[EMAIL
Hi Chad
>What I don't get is how you got spamd to pickup the white listed
>entries on both boxes? AFAIK spamd does not look at the logs, simply
>puts entries in, does not read them.
I must admit I haven't deliberately studied it, but I was going on the
contents of man (8) spamlogd which says:
since a lot of freebsd developers are now attacking me in private for
a mail i sent to their lists, and i am entirely bored of their private
attacks, I am just going to send it all here so that people can make
their own judgement of is transpiring.
btw, this is about reyk's talk at bsdcan, the sli
Are you saying that instead of distinguishing between
foo and my foo,
the distinction should be between
everybody's foo and foo
for some spelling of everybody's
As Nick points out, I've been feeding the flames when I should be doing
other things. I'm going to try one last time to offer a word to t
Hi Phillip,
My situation, at this point is hypothetical, though based on reality in
carrier grade messaging systems. I have been building and implementing
large scale systems for many years, so I have had time thinking small,
which can be good and bad. :)
I understand your setup, makes perfect
YES! That was the problem! Thanks a lot!
George
On Sunday 15 May 2005 01:02, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> On 5/14/05, GV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, I don't need any port of that machine to be exposed to the Internet.
> > Only a certain range.
> >
> > I tried the following:
> >
> > --
> >
On May 15, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Jason Dixon wrote:
On May 15, 2005, at 4:11 PM, GV wrote:
not really. Actually I would like to avoid that. I rather wanted to
have one
external IP address and different ports on this address should
redirect to
different internal machines!
Ok, let's nip this in the bud
On May 15, 2005, at 4:11 PM, GV wrote:
not really. Actually I would like to avoid that. I rather wanted to
have one
external IP address and different ports on this address should
redirect to
different internal machines!
Ok, let's nip this in the bud once and for all. You just want to use
binat
Steve Shockley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the biggest bottleneck when compiling the ports tree?
CPU.
Disk is not a big contributor, unless you are building on something
really slow like a laptop disk.
> Would compiling ports actually use four processors?
Not by default, no.
However, Ni
not really. Actually I would like to avoid that. I rather wanted to have one
external IP address and different ports on this address should redirect to
different internal machines!
On Sunday 15 May 2005 17:47, Andreas Boman wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, what you are asking for requires
never had the chance to implement a bridge configuration before so I have to
do some reading on this first before going on with it.
Thanks for your time
George
On Sunday 15 May 2005 18:13, Reg wrote:
> So, if i understand correcly, you want all ip services on the internal
> machine exposed to s
Are you saying that instead of distinguishing between
foo and my foo,
the distinction should be between
everybody's foo and foo
for some spelling of everybody's
?
>- --- Original Message --- -
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sun, 15 May 2005 14:43:00
>
>On Mo
Big rule of scripting: More work gets done by writing code than by
arguing about scripting languages.
Pick a language. Learn it. Work with it. Implement some tasks in it.
If you are satisfied with it, good. If not, try some other language.
You ain't marrying it, if it doesn't work out, move o
On Sunday 15 May 2005 20.11, Alexander Hall wrote:
> Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
> > LSI 150-4 works like a charm (OpenBSD 3.6 + driver cleanup patches from
> > CVS)... I have many of them. Both in 32 and 64 bit slots. Now I use it on
> > some OpenBSD 3.7 installations as well.
> >
> > What can I say..
On May 15, 2005, at 2:30 PM, Adam wrote:
I never said otherwise. I said you can have optional args in lots of
other languages too, as Jason seemed to think @_ allows optional args,
while languages using named args don't.
What I was saying is that in almost every Perl program I've written or
read,
Alexander Hall wrote:
So they work well in 32-bit PCI slots as well? I thought (for no other
than visual reasons) that they required a 64-bit slot. We were thinking
about byuing one for our ISP1100 (somewhat old, but stable), which has
no 64-bit PCI slot. Do you know if there is anything special
>there are times when it's actually worth the effort to ...
Oh yes. Now, do you determine whether the trip is worthwhile
by examining hammers or by examining the nails?
(Language zealots all seem to have the problem
of looking only at the hammers;)
>A Britt, a Scotsman, an Aussie, a Texan, a New Y
On Mon, 16 May 2005 01:05:28 +0900
Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The bug/feature is that you can't declare variables unless you
> declare them either "local" (which is usually not what you want) or
> "my" (which _is_ what you usually want). The buggy aspects of this
> feature are mostly r
On 5/15/05, Alexander Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So they work well in 32-bit PCI slots as well? I thought (for no other
> than visual reasons) that they required a 64-bit slot.
LSI Logic mentions on its website (that is, its knowledge base; I
don't have a direct link) that these cards also
On Sun, 15 May 2005 11:59:04 +0200
Marc Espie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:49:34AM -0400, Adam wrote:
> > First of all, that's not a benefit. In most languages you can have
> > optional arguments to functions, without forcing all functions to
> > take only a single arra
Thank you all once again for your help for I am now a little more
informed, and I know that I do not have to buy a book just yet.
I wonder how similar perl is to c++? Since my teacher in university
told me when you learn one language you know them all (not litteraly).
But I guess I'll find out from
Per-Olov Sjvholm wrote:
LSI 150-4 works like a charm (OpenBSD 3.6 + driver cleanup patches from
CVS)... I have many of them. Both in 32 and 64 bit slots. Now I use it on
some OpenBSD 3.7 installations as well.
What can I say... I wont buy any adaptec cards ;-)
/Per-Olov
So they work well in 32-
On Mon, 16 May 2005 01:13:03 +0900, Joel Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> I'm quite sure Paul Graham would very
>> happily tell you all the logical reasons why the end result would
>> eventually be a dialect of LISP. ;-)
>
>And perl is a dialect of LISP, isn't it?
>
>:-/
>
I would bet said se
What's the biggest bottleneck when compiling the ports tree? I've got
two machines available; the first is a P4-2.4, 1gb RAM, with two 15k
disks on an Adaptec 39160 SCSI (ports tree on its own spindle), and a
quad Xeon 500/2mb, 3gb EDO RAM, 5x 10k disks on an LSI RAID controller
with 128mb cac
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 04:22:10PM +0200, -f wrote:
> hi there,
>
> i am reading about UDF on wikipedia, and it states that
> udf is becoming popular on flash media.
>
> i saw the udf commits to the tree, and i was wondering
> if it was possible to udf format a disk. as both windows
> and openbs
Mikhail Malamud wrote:
This blows because I am porting a legacy application
from an MVS system. This application accesses two
sequential datasets - flat files that are over 10GBs.
Since both files have to be accessed at the same time,
I was hoping to put them on different platters to
avoid disk con
So, if i understand correcly, you want all ip services on the internal
machine exposed to some NAT'd ip? Keep in mind if this machine is
compromised the entire internal network is then compromised.
Think about Mario's suggestion about transparent bridging. This way you
can allow all access fro
I'm quite sure Paul Graham would very
happily tell you all the logical reasons why the end result would
eventually be a dialect of LISP. ;-)
And perl is a dialect of LISP, isn't it?
:-/
--
Joel Rees
(A FORTH dreamer, imprisoned in a Java world)
{ promote my $language;
redo;
}
What about declaring a variable in the block it's being used is so
difficult for you? It's pretty simple... define a variable in the
main namespace, it's a global. Define it in a block, it's lexical.
This is a bit of an oversimplification, but
Uh, tha
If I understand you correctly, what you are asking for requires an
external IP for each of the internal servers. After that it is just a
matter of forwarding all ports from an external ip to an internal one,
applying firewall rules either on the gateway/router box or on the
internal server.
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 20.41, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> Just a happy user report. Hopefully, this is of use for those
> searching the archives.
>
> As it seems, the LSI Logic MegaRAID SATA 150-4 seems another name for
> the LSI/Symbios 523 listed in the HCL. For completeness, I attached a
> dmesg o
hi there,
i am reading about UDF on wikipedia, and it states that
udf is becoming popular on flash media.
i saw the udf commits to the tree, and i was wondering
if it was possible to udf format a disk. as both windows
and openbsd understands udf, maybe it could be used as
a crossplatform file sy
On Sun, 15 May 2005 05:32:07 -0500, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>To add to your excellent analogy with hammers,
>Do you drive across town to get that one best hammer to drive one nail?
>
Oddly enough there are times when it's actually worth the effort to go
across town to pick up a hammer better s
To add to your excellent analogy with hammers,
Do you drive across town to get that one best hammer to drive one nail?
OT. I use PHP, I like PHP.
Perl Monks: PHP - it's "training wheels without the bike" -- Randal L.
Schwartz
Pretty accurate. (But imagine PHP if perl didn't exist;)
Way OT. I lurk
I would use OpenBSD's transparent bridging feature with (optionally) pf
filtering.
Mario.
Hi,
I have a situation where an internal (located in a LAN and behind a OpenBSD
firewall/NAT) has to be fully exposed to the Internet! What's the best way
to
acieve that?
Thanks
George
On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 12:49:34AM -0400, Adam wrote:
> First of all, that's not a benefit. In most languages you can have
> optional arguments to functions, without forcing all functions to take
> only a single array of scalar variables.
You know, maybe you should read perl documentation.
In pe
On 2005-05-14 23:39:11 -0700, Eugene Hercun wrote:
> Thank you for your responses. Sorry I could not reply sooner since I
> went to work before I posted this e-mail. Anyway, I might have missed
> it, but did anyone recommend a book regarding scripting for BSD with
> perl?
You don't need that. Per
On Sat, 14 May 2005 23:39:11 -0700, Eugene Hercun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thank you for your responses. Sorry I could not reply sooner since I
>went to work before I posted this e-mail. Anyway, I might have missed
>it, but did anyone recommend a book regarding scripting for BSD with
>perl?
>I
Thank you for your comments.
George
On Sunday 15 May 2005 00:57, Arnaud Bergeron wrote:
> Sorry if this seems a bit out of order, because I commented as it came to
> me.
>
> On 5/13/05, GV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have following LAN configuration:
> >
> > [ COMP_1 ] ... [ COM
I apologize for the confusion but didn't realize that my question wasn't clear
enough!
Well, the whole story was to have a server in the LAN (actually a range of
servers!) where only NAT and no firewall had to be enabled. Users from
Internet should have full access to all the ports of these ser
Thank you for your responses. Sorry I could not reply sooner since I
went to work before I posted this e-mail. Anyway, I might have missed
it, but did anyone recommend a book regarding scripting for BSD with
perl?
I think were getting a little bit off topic in the last few posts... =)
Eugene
53 matches
Mail list logo
