> If you see this ...
>
> X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM
> (Specifically, the "SFV:SPM")
>
> That means we thought it was spam
grep SFV:SPM spam/* | wc -l
56
Thank you Michael, that contribution to the community will be useful to
us.
Bryan Bradsby
512.936.2248
Texas State G
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Michael Wise wrote:
>
> About the only way to report it that won't get ignored (presupposing this
> didn't wind up in the mailbox of a HotMail, AOL, Yahoo, or similar service
> that we have an ARF-based Feedback Loop with) is via SpamCop.
Yes, this is
Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been
Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of l...@lena.kiev.ua
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 2:36 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Protecti
ailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Rich Kulawiec
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 5:15 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00:01PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always
Reporting Tool ?
-Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Carl Byington
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 8:36 AM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:50 -0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:50 -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
> You left off mail-bn1hn0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com
> Return-Path:
> Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-
> bn1hn0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
>
> I've seen a noticeable uptick in (obvious) spam from the following
> similarly-named servers in the last 60 days:
You left off mail-bn1hn0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com
Return-Path:
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.ou
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00:01PM -0700, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage
> from the servers called..
>
> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com
I've seen a noticeable uptick in (obvious) spam from the following
similarly
> From: Michael Wise
> The account has probably already been killed.
I doubt that. I quoted entire header and the one-line body, but:
==
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 22:03:03 +0300
From: l...@lena.kiev.ua
To: ab...@microsoft.com
Subject:
Original Message-
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Noel Butler
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 3:16 PM
To: mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..
On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote:
>
> We are compelled to deliver it; t
On 15/09/2015 05:34, Michael Wise wrote:
We are compelled to deliver it; talk to the senders who wander around
wondering what the heck happened to a message that they handed off to
a given mailhost and it was never delivered.
We've all been seeing that for over a decade with hotmail, we succ
On 15/09/2015 06:54, Franck Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors
> wrote:
>
>> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from the
>> servers called..
>>
>> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com [1]
>>
>> And over the
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors
wrote:
> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from
> the servers called..
>
> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com
>
> And over the last week, those numbers substantially increased..
>
> However, whi
rocessed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ?
-Original Message-
From: Michael Peddemors [mailto:mich...@linuxmagic.com]
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:25 PM
To: Michael Wise ; mailop
Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook..
On 15-09-14 12:16 PM, Michael Wise wrote
On 15-09-14 12:16 PM, Michael Wise wrote:
If you see this ...
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:SPM
(Specifically, the "SFV:SPM")
That means we thought it was spam, but due to the pipelined nature of our
service, rather than drop it on the floor as some do, we were compelled to
[mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Michael Peddemors
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:00 PM
To: mailop
Subject: [mailop] Protection Outlook..
Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from
the servers called..
https://na01.safelinks.pr
Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from
the servers called..
mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com
And over the last week, those numbers substantially increased..
However, while caught by our filtering systems, you have to look at some
simple obv
17 matches
Mail list logo
