Um, No.[tm] I pointed out the header and value to safely write a rule for the traffic way down thread, and you've chosen to ignore my advice.
Aloha, Michael. -- Michael J Wise | Microsoft | Spam Analysis | "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed." | Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool ? -----Original Message----- From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Carl Byington Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 8:36 AM To: mailop@mailop.org Subject: Re: [mailop] Protection Outlook.. <sic> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 08:50 -0500, Chris Boyd wrote: > You left off mail-bn1hn0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com > Return-Path: <mailer-dae...@pennzoil.gizmopartners.com> > Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail- > bn1hn0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.110.247]) > by pennzoil.gizmopartners.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id > t8FCEUw3031966 > (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA256 bits=256 verify=OK) > for <cb...@gizmopartners.com>; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:14:33 -0500 > Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=<>; Does this /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf segment look correct? # 2015-09-15 kill outbound.protection.outlook.com (opoc) leaking spam header OPOC Authentication-Results =~ /spf=none.*smtp\.mailfrom=<>/ score OPOC 10.0 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlX4Os0ACgkQL6j7milTFsHnUQCdGohMK+gL6kg0ETWJR0lO3pbJ Y5kAnilfaqtdZsdmcSGMGol6XE7hcgHR =29kh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop
