On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Michael Peddemors <mich...@linuxmagic.com>
wrote:

> Monitoring from ISP's and Telco's has always shown a lot of leakage from
> the servers called..
>
> mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com
>
> And over the last week, those numbers substantially increased..
>
> However, while caught by our filtering systems, you have to look at some
> simple obvious issues..
>
> (Maybe someone can explain how this traffic is relayed, and why it is so
> hard to stop at the source?)
>
> Return-Path: <>
>
> ^^^^ (We wrote a 'fake bounce' rule specifically for
> protection.outlook.com servers)
>  Much of the spam shows up with no Return-Path, I am sure that can be
> prevented, no?
>
> Delivered-To: mich...@linuxmagic.com
> Received: (qmail 29387 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2015 17:13:15 -0000
> Received: from mail-pu1apc01hn0200.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO
> APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) (104.47.126.200)
>         by be.cityemail.com with SMTP
>         (e1fa336e-5b03-11e5-8599-5bc0ef165c91); Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:13:15
> -0700
> Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=<>;
>
> ^^^^^ Could this be a clue? No Sender IP? No MailFrom?
>

the HELO hostname does not have an SPF record:
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com

cf http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7208#section-10.1.3


>
> Received: from [106.223.20.123] (106.223.20.123) by
>  SG2PR0201MB0984.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.162.202.155) with Microsoft
>  SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.268.17; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:13:03 +0000
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0365285247=="
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Subject: I Have An Urgent Matter To Discuss With You
> To: recipie...@wizard.ca
> From: v...@wizard.ca, hol...@wizard.ca, k...@wizard.ca
>
> ^^^^ None of the above exist of course.. actually sent to different
> addresses
>
> Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:42:56 +0530
> Reply-To: <verahollinkv...@gmail.com>
>
> ^^^^^ Isn't this suspicious?
>
> seems someone can get outlook.com to do some backscatter or inject a fake
bounce and have it routed by outlook.com ?
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
http://chilli.nosignal.org/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to