Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

Anna's case is still uncanny, I trust her organization respects Gmail's requirements to use identifiers for campaigns, and not being almost unique per message sent. If it was the case anyway, she wouldn't get enough volume per identifier to trigger any feedback. I found a case in my data: - number

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

Well, actually it depends on how the identifiers are defined, if they are almost unique per messages sent, that's normal, but we don't have enough infos here on how the identifiers are assigned/defined. users spam rate is the spam rate for your whole domain, not depending if it reach any max spam

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

Digging up this topic, @Anna> you might have had some feedback from Google about that since your message? I can still sleep at night, but I'm curious about the outcome! -- Benjamin 2017-05-31 18:23 GMT+02:00 Nick Schafer : > The feedback loop shouldn't include messages caught by their spam fi

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

The feedback loop shouldn't include messages caught by their spam filter as users aren't able to complain against a message already in the spam folder. The feedback loop is used to identify campaigns in a sender's traffic that are getting a high volume of complaints from Gmail users. From my unders

Re: [mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

On 31/05/2017 10:29, Anna Ward wrote: I've talked to a bunch of different industry folks at this point, and no one seems to understand the difference between "user reported spam" and "feedback loop spam" in Google Postmaster Tools . A nota

[mailop] Google Postmaster Tools: spam rates

I've talked to a bunch of different industry folks at this point, and no one seems to understand the difference between "user reported spam" and "feedback loop spam" in Google Postmaster Tools . A notable example for me was May 8th when a clien