Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 18, 2023 9:08:40 AM EST, Mark Alley via mailop wrote: >On 2/17/2023 9:27 PM, H wrote: >> On February 16, 2023 8:57:49 PM EST, Mark Alley via >mailop wrote: >>> As long as the organizational domain you want reports for is the >same >>> as >>> you have published in the DMARC RUA/RUF "m

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 2/17/2023 9:27 PM, H wrote: > On February 16, 2023 8:57:49 PM EST, Mark Alley via mailop > wrote: >> As long as the organizational domain you want reports for is the same >> as >> you have published in the DMARC RUA/RUF "mailto" tags, then no, you do >> not >> need it to be able to receive sai

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 16, 2023 8:57:49 PM EST, Mark Alley via mailop wrote: >As long as the organizational domain you want reports for is the same >as >you have published in the DMARC RUA/RUF "mailto" tags, then no, you do >not >need it to be able to receive said reports. > >- Mark Alley > >On Thu, Feb 16,

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

As long as the organizational domain you want reports for is the same as you have published in the DMARC RUA/RUF "mailto" tags, then no, you do not need it to be able to receive said reports. - Mark Alley On Thu, Feb 16, 2023, 7:47 PM H wrote: > On February 16, 2023 6:37:42 PM EST, Mark Alley v

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 16, 2023 6:37:42 PM EST, Mark Alley via mailop wrote: >You only need to create that record if you are sending the >aggregate/failure reports for a particular domain that is different >from >the one the reports are actually on behalf of. > >So for example, if you owned domain1.com and

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

You only need to create that record if you are sending the aggregate/failure reports for a particular domain that is different from the one the reports are actually on behalf of. So for example, if you owned domain1.com and wanted to send RUA/RUF reports for domain1.com to a mailbox at domain2.com

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 02/11/2023 07:42 PM, H wrote: > On 02/11/2023 01:55 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: >> >>> On 2023-02-11 02:51 H via mailop wrote: >>> >>>  >>> On 02/10/2023 10:13 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote: > I now did find that resource but it

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

Correct, DMARC at none will only send XML reports that tell you if a message had an aligned SPF/DKIM and if it authenticated properly. It will also show you if anyone else is sending as your domain that you weren't aware of. I highly recommend using a tool like Postmark's free DMARC reporting (o

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 02/11/2023 01:55 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: > >> On 2023-02-11 02:51 H via mailop wrote: >> >>  >> On 02/10/2023 10:13 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: >>> On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote: I now did find that resource but it is written as general information and >>

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

Dnia 11.02.2023 o godz. 00:40:51 Bill Cole via mailop pisze: > > ChatGPT and its ilk are not explainers of facts, they are sequencers > of words. ChatGPT has a habit of producing prose which is both > grammatically perfect and 100% bullshit. Not what you want in > customer support. Not mentioning

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

> On 2023-02-11 06:47 schrieb Bill Cole via mailop wrote: > > On 2023-02-10 at 20:44:00 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Feb 2023 20:44:00 -0500) > H via mailop > is rumored to have said: > >> I can only believe that when ChatGPT and similar take over all types of >> customer support functions the quality of

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 2023-02-11 02:51 H via mailop wrote:  On 02/10/2023 10:13 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote: I now did find that resource but it is written as general information and does not really tell how to get it going with IONOS if they run the email serv

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 2023-02-10 at 20:44:00 UTC-0500 (Fri, 10 Feb 2023 20:44:00 -0500) H via mailop is rumored to have said: I can only believe that when ChatGPT and similar take over all types of customer support functions the quality of support will be improved - and answers consistent... Who knows... Don't

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 02/10/2023 10:13 AM, Gellner, Oliver via mailop wrote: > On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote: > >>> On February 9, 2023 9:01:38 PM EST, Al Iverson >>> wrote: Where did you find the Ionos instructions? I have only found third-party instructions which I do not consider to be author

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 2/9/23 4:41 PM, H via mailop wrote: > Having successfully created a SPF record for my domain hosted by > Ionos, I now wanted to create a DKIM record but have received two > completely different answers from Ionos. > > The first instruction I received was to create a CNAME record The reason th

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 2023-02-10 04:08, H via mailop wrote: >> On February 9, 2023 9:01:38 PM EST, Al Iverson >> wrote: >>> Where did you find the Ionos instructions? I have only found >>> third-party instructions which I do not consider to be authoritative. >>> As I wrote, the instructions I received from them we

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

H via mailop skrev den 2023-02-10 01:41: If anyone could set me straight, it would be greatly appreciated. never use cname for content that is to be dnssec, even if your domain is not dnssec yet, it should not be used, opendkim use dnssec, but many testers seem to not do the validate dnssec,

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

In consumer applications, DKIM is usually signed on behalf of the sending domain it has been configured for (if at all). If you own domain1.com on IONOS and set up DKIM signing for it, domain1.com email from that mail system will be signed. If you own domain2.com on IONOS and have not set up s

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 9, 2023 9:01:38 PM EST, Al Iverson wrote: > >> I think the selector, if I understood this correctly, is actually >_domainkey. > >Nope. Example: >x._domainkey.xnnd.com >For mine, x is the selctor. >You _always_ include _domainkey > > >> Where did you find th

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 9, 2023 9:01:38 PM EST, Al Iverson wrote: > >> I think the selector, if I understood this correctly, is actually >_domainkey. > >Nope. Example: >x._domainkey.xnnd.com >For mine, x is the selctor. >You _always_ include _domainkey > > >> Where did you find th

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 9, 2023 9:03:26 PM EST, Eric Tykwinski wrote: >I think you are confused about the key signing, the mail server sending >the email is generating the keys. They are the ones signing the >emails. So if you send emails through Ionos -> receiving MTA, they >should be the one signing the

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On February 9, 2023 9:03:26 PM EST, Eric Tykwinski wrote: >I think you are confused about the key signing, the mail server sending >the email is generating the keys. They are the ones signing the >emails. So if you send emails through Ionos -> receiving MTA, they >should be the one signing the

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 02/09/2023 08:53 PM, H wrote: > On 02/09/2023 07:51 PM, Al Iverson wrote: >> The DKIM public key is technically a TXT record. >> Some people do use a CNAME version, but then yeah, you put in the hostname >> of the real server (real DNS entry) that has the TXT entry. >> So in your case, you’re p

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

On 02/09/2023 07:51 PM, Al Iverson wrote: > The DKIM public key is technically a TXT record. > Some people do use a CNAME version, but then yeah, you put in the hostname of > the real server (real DNS entry) that has the TXT entry. > So in your case, you’re probably looking to paste that key value

Re: [mailop] DKIM record IONOS

The DKIM public key is technically a TXT record. Some people do use a CNAME version, but then yeah, you put in the hostname of the real server (real DNS entry) that has the TXT entry. So in your case, you’re probably looking to paste that key value into the TXT record. Your selector is “k1” in t

[mailop] DKIM record IONOS

Having successfully created a SPF record for my domain hosted by Ionos, I now wanted to create a DKIM record but have received two completely different answers from Ionos. The first instruction I received was to create a CNAME record, enter k1._domainkey in the Host field, and then a key the Va