On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 5:25 PM Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop <
mailop@mailop.org> wrote:
> Interestingly, Google's GMail allows access to external eMail
> accounts via POP3. There's no IMAP4 support there.
>
They support IMAP as well.
-- Marcel
_
> > On 28 Jan 2024, at 20:23, Thomas Walter via mailop
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
> >> There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified as
> >> spam
> >> or non-spam. Even with best tuned spam filtering systems false posit
Hi fellow Mailopers, I hope you are all having a nice day. I was checking in
to see if others were seeing timeouts connecting to Yahoo/AOL throughout the
day today. I noticed it starting earlier this morning around 9:30am Eastern
and has been intermittent throughout the day. I checked MXToolb
And of course, this 'could' be caused by backscatter on their servers,
if the emails originated from your server ;)
Ensure your domains have SPF records of course, but we need more
information on the list to determine if this is forgeries, or an eBay
inherent problem.
Suggest you send more h
> Randolf Richardson, Postmaster via mailop schrieb:
> > Marco Moock via mailop wrote:
> >
> > > Is there any way to contact them so they can figure out
> > > the source of those mails?
> >
> > Have you inspected the SMTP headers and grepped mail
> > server logs?
>
> Of course.
> It comes from
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 12:24 PM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:01 AM Todd Herr via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> Users can only click "This is spam" on messages that end up in their
>> inbox. If all of your traffic went to the spam folder, perhaps because it
>> was unfortuna
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:01 AM Todd Herr via mailop
wrote:
> Users can only click "This is spam" on messages that end up in their
> inbox. If all of your traffic went to the spam folder, perhaps because it
> was unfortunately remarkably similar to previous traffic that was deemed
> spam, you wo
Hello mailop
Anybody on the feed that has contact info for Italian MBP tim.it , alice.it
?
We have serious blocking issues on our transactional emails to this provider
but we don't seem to be finding any luck in contacting them.
Bram Van Daele
Founder & Owner
Management | Teneo BV
On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:51 AM Scott Mutter via mailop
wrote:
> > It would also give feedback to spammers allowing them to fine-tune their
> > messages to avoid getting flagged.
>
> What about feedback loops? Don't those also fall into the category of
> aiding the spammer? But they are also a
> It would also give feedback to spammers allowing them to fine-tune their
> messages to avoid getting flagged.
What about feedback loops? Don't those also fall into the category of
aiding the spammer? But they are also a tool for legitimate mail server
administrators to combat spam on their net
And if you’re worried about spammers fine-tuning based on this response, keep
in mind that they likely already have a fair number of test accounts at various
mailbox providers.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: Brotman, Alex
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024
I did create this a while ago.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brotman-srds/
This would allow the MTA doing the sending to see that it will go to the spam
folder. I’ve created initial code to support this, but haven’t yet deployed it.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging
Dnia 28.01.2024 o godz. 22:04:26 Jay Hennigan via mailop pisze:
> Conversely, when the receiver purges everything else in the spam
> folder without opening it, this gives feedback that the decision to
> route it to spam was correct.
And this is often the problem, because - as I mentioned - users t
Dnia 28.01.2024 o godz. 23:44:29 Scott Mutter via mailop pisze:
> What if the receiving mail server tagged the message in some way in their
> final acknowledgement of the message. For Google. instead of:
>
> 250 2.0.0 OK 1706409809
> h4-20020ac8584400b10427e71c979dsi9837397zyh.449 - gsmtp
>
This particular campaign did not rise above the normal background noise here,
but
the previous campaigns that I have seen really do not differ much from the quite
ordinary, boring and perhaps even slightly incompetently run spamming
campaigns.
Apart from the content that seems to raise some eye
Hello,
We received alert from spamcop for thoses IP. It’s a new account created after
the termination of the previous one who send *.sbs mail. Account closed. If you
send report to mailto:ab...@ovh.net (or ab...@ovh.ca) , don’t hesitate to send
to me the abuseID (abuse#ABCDEFG) or the mail ad
Hello,
We have some rules to prevent SPAM, but we don't have any software access to
the customer's server. Each customer is responsible of his use regarding the
law and our term and condition. After receiving an abuse report, we let enough
time for the customer to solve the issue, and if don't
> On 28 Jan 2024, at 20:23, Thomas Walter via mailop wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28.01.24 20:02, Jaroslaw Rafa via mailop wrote:
>> There are "edge cases" when the mail couldn't be reliably classified as spam
>> or non-spam. Even with best tuned spam filtering systems false positives
>> will happen.
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
