On 2021-09-07 23:24:48 (+0800), Andre van Eyssen via mailop wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
She should find a local hosting provider, someone that she can pick
up the phone and call, but of course you get what you pay for.
I've found this thread a little amusing
On 9/7/21 11:05, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:
Fail2Ban to the rescue! ;-)
In some cases. In far too many others, the mailbox user ends up getting
spearphished and responds to an official-looking spam email asking to
verify credentials, warning of mailbox errors, over quota, etc. Bad guys
On 2021-09-07 at 11:24:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 08 Sep 2021 01:24:48 +1000
(AEST))
Andre van Eyssen via mailop
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
She should find a local hosting provider, someone that she can pick
up the phone and call, but of course yo
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 4:08 PM Jarland Donnell via mailop
wrote:
>
> I've got that whole AS46573 on my internal RBL. Just a complete trash
> network. You can blindfold yourself and throw a dart at any of their
> /24s and every single one looks like this:
> https://bgp.he.net/net/23.247.86.0/24#_dn
I was just being nice and not calling out the more reputable hosting
companies, that also probably found out this week that they gave IP
space or found a hacker taking over IP space on their networks.
So used one of the bad reputation networks ;)
On 2021-09-07 1:59 p.m., Jarland Donnell via ma
I've got that whole AS46573 on my internal RBL. Just a complete trash
network. You can blindfold yourself and throw a dart at any of their
/24s and every single one looks like this:
https://bgp.he.net/net/23.247.86.0/24#_dns
On 2021-09-07 15:37, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
It's always
On 2021-09-06 at 20:18:07 UTC-0400 (Mon, 06 Sep 2021 20:18:07 -0400)
yuv via mailop
is rumored to have said:
But what motivates expert mailops to only reccomend the oligopolists
as an inbox host?
The parameters of the request: tech challenged customer, business
domain, was fine with GD.
I
On 2021-09-07 14:20, John Levine wrote:
It appears that John Capo via mailop said:
The only IPv6 issues I have seen, other than transit only via HE, is
delivering to Google. Google seems to assume that mail via IPv6 is
spam.
The same mail flow via IPv4 is OK with Google. Proper DNS and all
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Mike Hammett wrote:
I now manage another ISP with another set of e-mail servers
I went to sign up for SNDS with my work e-mail.
I don't want to use my existing account because I want some amount of
separation of duties.
What are the rest of you doing in these kinds o
I actually use a free outlook.com address to manage mine. I'd hate for
it to be tied to an Office 365 account and then a vendor change close
the account later, seems like it would create a bit of a headache.
On 2021-09-07 13:09, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:
I now manage another ISP with anot
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 13:09 -0500, Mike Hammett via mailop wrote:
> I went to sign up for SNDS with my work e-mail. [...] and "You can't
> [...]."
> Well, that's dumb.
That's Microsoft: Size can compensate for dumb, unfortunately.
> What are the rest of you doing in these kinds of scenarios?
I dealt with that here by creating a new Hotmail account just for SNDS
access.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 1:12 PM Mike Hammett via mailop
wrote:
> I now manage another ISP with another set of e-mail servers (customers,
> internal systems, alerts, etc.).
>
> I went to sign up for SNDS with my work e-
It appears that John Capo via mailop said:
>The only IPv6 issues I have seen, other than transit only via HE, is
>delivering to Google. Google seems to assume that mail via IPv6 is spam.
> The same mail flow via IPv4 is OK with Google. Proper DNS and all that
>stuff, of course.
Google has cl
Fail2Ban to the rescue! ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Lyall via mailop"
To: mailop@mailop.org
Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 8:41:27 PM
Subject: [mailop] Gangs scanning
It appears that Mary via mailop said:
>
>I don't know why nobody suggested it, but why not ProtonMail?
>
>https://protonmail.com/
Because they don't quite do what they imply they do:
https://techcrunch.com/2021/09/06/protonmail-logged-ip-address-of-french-activist-after-order-by-swiss-authoritie
I now manage another ISP with another set of e-mail servers (customers,
internal systems, alerts, etc.).
I went to sign up for SNDS with my work e-mail. We use Office 365 for the
corporate mail and "You can't sign up here with a work or school email
address." Well, that's dumb.
I don't wan
On 9/7/21 6:24 AM, John Capo via mailop wrote:
The only IPv6 issues I have seen, other than transit only via HE, is
delivering to Google. Google seems to assume that mail via IPv6 is spam.
The same mail flow via IPv4 is OK with Google. Proper DNS and all
that stuff, of course.
I send and r
(Resending without the attachment per the Ops request but just email me
if you are interested :-) )
I would love to throw my firm's hat in the rink. For those who know
PCCC, we are experts in open source work, cyber security, anti-spam and
anti-phishing and have done so since 1998 including f
+1 for FastMail, can't believe I forgot about them! They're awesome.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, September 6th, 2021 at 6:40 PM, Byron Lunz via mailop
wrote:
> What about fastmail.com ?
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 3:59 PM Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Michael Peddemors via mailop wrote:
She should find a local hosting provider, someone that she can pick up the
phone and call, but of course you get what you pay for.
I've found this thread a little amusing in that we spend so much time
railing against the power held by so
There are lots' of companies that do email hosting, but you mentioned
she is 'tech challenged'. In this case, they should NOT be looking for
a large hosting company.
She should find a local hosting provider, someone that she can pick up
the phone and call, but of course you get what you pay f
On 2021-09-06 23:58, Philip Paeps via mailop wrote:
On 2021-09-07 08:54:51 (+0800), Andre van Eyssen via mailop wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Neil Jenkins via mailop wrote:
Obviously I'm biased, but our service Fastmail sounds exactly like
what you are looking
for. We have setup wizards for cust
I also remember that GoDaddy was offering Open-Xchange email solution
but on the page that you link GoDaddy said that:
"All Professional Business Email plans include:"
- Outlook web application
So, probably they are still using Open-Xchange email solution but for
the future want just only pro
I don't think GoDaddy is discontinuing all email solutions except O365 &
GWS.
They do offer Open-Xchange based email solution:
https://uk.godaddy.com/email/professional-business-email
On 2021-09-07 11:44, Dominique Rousseau via mailop wrote:
Le Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0600, Anne P.
Le Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 04:47:16PM -0600, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop
[mailop@mailop.org] a écrit:
> All,
>
> I know someone who is setting up a business domain, and needs an inbox
> host. Her registrar/webhost is GoDaddy and they are discontinuing
> their free hosted email, and referring
Hi Anne,
I can suggest my own company https://www.qboxmail.com . We provide email
hosting only. We provide Control Panel, API, Webmail and standard
protocol for email client.
Ciao
Il 07/09/21 00:47, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop ha scritto:
All,
I know someone who is setting up a busin
Am 07.09.21 um 00:47 schrieb Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. via mailop:
All,
I know someone who is setting up a business domain, and needs an inbox host.
Her registrar/webhost is GoDaddy and they are discontinuing their free hosted
email, and referring people to paid Office365. It seems that all of t
27 matches
Mail list logo
