On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 04:21:00AM +0300, Udicoudco wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 3:38 AM Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/09/2023 9:01 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > 2.4.0 Beta 5 was recently released (available here:
> > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/).
> > >
> > > Have
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 3:38 AM Andrew Parsloe wrote:
>
>
> On 12/09/2023 9:01 am, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > 2.4.0 Beta 5 was recently released (available here:
> > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.4/).
> >
> > Have any Windows users tested it yet? If so, has it gone smoothly?
Works great
right? So you can still use 2.3.x after installing it? Which one
is default? For example, if you double-click to open a .lyx file, does
it open with 2.3.x or with the newly installed Beta 5?
I'm going to meet with a friend who I might be able to convince to test
Beta 5, but I wanted to be able t
? Which one
is default? For example, if you double-click to open a .lyx file, does
it open with 2.3.x or with the newly installed Beta 5?
I'm going to meet with a friend who I might be able to convince to test
Beta 5, but I wanted to be able to let him know of any known issues, or
anything to
Sorry
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018, 10:03 PM Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:46:49AM +, Eric Barkan wrote:
> > Sorry, Scott. I first sent this to your own email by mistake. Re-sending
> to
> > the list.
>
> No problem, thanks for resending.
>
> > I've installed and run the latest 2.3.0
Am 17.03.2018 um 13:07 schrieb emile lunardon:
What are the main evolutions from Bundle and Installer 4 to 5 ?
There was a bug in the installer so that existing 64bit MiKTeX
installations were not detected.
Meanwhile I released version 6:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
that has
he latest changes in MiKTeX.
>>
>> I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
>> test cases:
>> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
>>
>> regards Uwe
>>
>
>
now fixed and report
>> back).
>>
>
> This is now fixed but I had to change the update process internally to
> reflect the latest changes in MiKTeX.
>
> I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
> test cases:
> http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
>
> regards Uwe
>
atest changes in MiKTeX.
I therefore created the new installer version 4 that works for all of my
test cases:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
regards Uwe
I'm glad to see it all makes sense now. Thank you for everything you do on
LyX !
2018-03-08 18:04 GMT+01:00 Uwe Stöhr :
> Am 08.03.2018 um 11:56 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> How could I let the Miktex update happen? It's very simple, bundle3
>> displayed a window...
>>
>
> OK, so you didn't update
Am 08.03.2018 um 11:56 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
How could I let the Miktex update happen? It's very simple, bundle3
displayed a window...
OK, so you didn't update MiKTeX manually.
I don't know if Miktex was really broken, but LyX was no more able to
launch the compilation of the documents. Th
Am 07.03.2018 um 17:06 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
I certainly did not update manually Miktex during the bundle3
installation. Read again my messages,
You wrote
"To test this new installation program, I let the Miktex update run. I
have no idea what has been updated, but what's for su
ually updated MiKTeX and that breaks it (as I explained due to a
bug in MiKTeX). Installing version 3 of the installer will fix this. I
asked him to test this since I am too very curious if this works.
Emile, what is the result?
regards Uwe
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 10:08:33AM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 05.03.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> > This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
> > So the things are going reallv worse !
>
> No problem, everything is fine now. All you have to do is to ins
Am 05.03.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
So the things are going reallv worse !
No problem, everything is fine now. All you have to do is to install LyX
using version 3 of the installer. Please don't manually fiddle
Am 05.03.2018 um 10:41 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
> This new bundle (v3) for LyX2.3 imposes *without giving the
possibility to decline the offer,* the update of Miktex. Is it really
what is wanted ?
Yes, because otherwise you can get this:
I have no idea what has been updated, but what's for s
This time, the usual way of repairing Miktex by an upgrade didn't work:
"Sorry, but something went wrong : Invalid argument: path= "C:\Program
Data\ ".
So the things are going reallv worse !
2018-03-05 10:41 GMT+01:00 Emile Lunardon :
> To test this new installa
To test this new installation program, I let the Miktex update run. I have
no idea what has been updated, but what's for sure is that the compilations
with LyX don't work anymore now ! (messsage : pdflatex program ended with
error).
I did not disable the "Windows defender"
iKTeX installed there cannot be a difference. The configuration of MiKTeX
> is always the same.
> We cannot do anything if virus programs detect false positives.
>
> Nevertheless, I created a new installer that should avoid the LaTeX
> problems reported by some users:
> http://ftp
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 03:59:49PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.03.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>
> > One possibility could be that the previous MiKTeX installation was not
> > detected.
>
> No, because then the bundle installer would install MiKTeX and this is
> something you will s
Am 04.03.2018 um 16:52 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
One possibility could be that the previous MiKTeX installation was not
detected.
No, because then the bundle installer would install MiKTeX and this is
something you will see as user because you have to accept the
installation explicitly.
reg
Am 04.03.2018 um 16:13 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Please test and report back also if your virus software (update its
virus definitions before) again finds something.
Emile,
can you please do me the favor and:
1. uninstall MiKTeX
2. install MiKTeX using the latest MiKTeX installer:
http://ctan.space
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 03:13:32PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 04.03.2018 um 06:50 schrieb Emile Lunardon:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:14:33AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> > > I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer
> > version of
> > > LyX2.3, keeping
On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 05:50:57AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> It's an old habit that probably goes back to the first versions of LyX on
> Windows (I used to work with LyX on Cygwin before). It seems to me that the
> bundle had been introduced so as not to have to worry about installing, at
> th
same.
We cannot do anything if virus programs detect false positives.
Nevertheless, I created a new installer that should avoid the LaTeX
problems reported by some users:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyXWinInstaller/LyX2.3.0/
Please test and report back also if your virus software (update its
virus de
It's an old habit that probably goes back to the first versions of LyX on
Windows (I used to work with LyX on Cygwin before). It seems to me that the
bundle had been introduced so as not to have to worry about installing, at
the good version, a whole lot of accessory software like the image
convert
On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:14:33AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer version of
> LyX2.3, keeping the anti-virus «Windows Defender» active. So the problem is
> well linked to the bundle and its interaction with Miktex 2.9.
Good to know.
I managed to have a successfull installation with the installer version of
LyX2.3, keeping the anti-virus «Windows Defender» active. So the problem is
well linked to the bundle and its interaction with Miktex 2.9.
2018-03-01 17:15 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:01:55PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> Scott, I tend to delay the public announce for LyX on Windows for some days.
OK.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I always use the bundle version of LyX for my installations (...LyX2.2.2,
LyX2.2.3, LyX2.3 RC1, LyX2.3RC2, LyX2.3) together with a local version of
Miktex and it is the first time I have this kind of problem.
2018-03-01 17:15 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +,
Am 01.03.2018 um 17:15 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
CONCLUSION
The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This
is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an
upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs Miktex 2.9
and allows
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> CONCLUSION
> The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This
> is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an
> upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time
> as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender)
> and installed only for the current user.
> The result is identical to the firs
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17.25.43 WET Eric Barkan wrote:
> Jose: I personally don't require any Babel packages; this just came up
> during testing. So no need to change the spec file, at least not for me.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eric Barkan
The underlying issue is what is the adequate set of late
On 28.02.2018 10:49, a...@andreashegenbart.de wrote:
The error "platex.exe not found" I received some weeks ago as well with
installing lyx 2.2.3
Hi Andreas,
Do you happen to use Avast Antivirus? At least that is what I expect my
problem came from. If you use it then my hunch is that Avast sc
I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time
as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender)
and installed only for the current user.
The result is identical to the first installation attempt : neither LyX2.3
nor LyX2.2.3 document compilatio
announce the release.
>
> Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
>
> If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundle" or the
> "installer"?
>
> Did you get a popup from the MiKTeX package manger during the
Scott and Jose,
Installing texlive-babel-spanish fixed the problem. The user guide now
compiles perfectly under Fedora 27.
Jose: I personally don't require any Babel packages; this just came up
during testing. So no need to change the spec file, at least not for me.
Thanks!
Eric Barkan
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 09:49:35AM +, a...@andreashegenbart.de wrote:
> I tested the installer, windows 7; pop up miktex 2.9: yes; updated miktex;
> continued as normal and finished successful.
> But opening lyx 2.3 showed the error-warning you´ll find attached; I
> confirmed "ok" and then lyx
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 07:06:08AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote:
> I had a big problem with the use of the new LyX 2.3 bundle.
>
> The installation by itself went fine, side by side with the current LyX
> 2.2.3 version, using my existing local Miktex 2.9 distribution. But the
> compilation with LyX
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 00.46.49 WET Eric Barkan wrote:
> Am I missing some package from Texlive?
Probably you are missing the babel packages:
You can install them as texlive-babel-spanish (or what is equivalent tex-
babel-spanish).
Probably we could add the tex-babel* as either a require
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org [mailto:lyx-users@lists.lyx.org] Im Auftrag
von Scott
> Kostyshak
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2018 23:13
> An: LyX Users
> Betreff: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?
>
> Dear Windows
to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
<ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0>
If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundle" or the
Windows users,
>
> We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
> would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
>
> Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
>
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
>
> If you test, which installer
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 04:05:43AM +, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> I had no problems with the installation (windows 7, installer rather than
> bundle). I always install offline to avoid possible hassles with the
> interaction with MiKTeX, which I keep up to date independently.
Good to know, thanks
On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:46:49AM +, Eric Barkan wrote:
> Sorry, Scott. I first sent this to your own email by mistake. Re-sending to
> the list.
No problem, thanks for resending.
> I've installed and run the latest 2.3.0 installer from the FTP site on
> Windows 10.
>
> I've done 2 install
On 28/02/2018 11:12 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
If
Sorry, Scott. I first sent this to your own email by mistake. Re-sending
to the list.
I've installed and run the latest 2.3.0 installer from the FTP site on
Windows 10.
I've done 2 installations, both against TexLive 2017:
1. Windows 10 running natively on a new Dell laptop with Kaby Lake
Yesterday I installed lyx 2.3.0 without any problems.
(Win 10)
Sergio
De: Scott Kostyshak
Enviado: martes, 27 de febrero de 2018 19:13
Para: LyX Users
Asunto: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error
Dear Windows users,
We received a report that the Windows installer lead to an error, so I
would like to get some more testing before we announce the release.
Can you test the installer for 2.3.0?
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/2.3.0
If you test, which installer did you test: the "bundl
this is a test, no action required
Michael
test ignore
Sorry - just a test to check that I'm still subscribed.
--
Daniel CLEMENT
test - ignore
--
Matyi
Am I still subscribed?
--
Daniel CLEMENT
test test ignore
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
this is a test of sending email via nntp server. Please disregard.
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
test
--
Using Opera's mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
test, please ignore
--
__
Stefano Franchi
Associate Research Professor
Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125
Texas A&M University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421
College Station, Texas, USA
Have to check if I can post here
--
Rainer M. Krug
email: RMKruggmailcom
test 1138
Hi all,
Thanks,
SteveT
Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/
Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Testing
have not yet encountered problems except of the next item.
>
> - If your existing LyX 1.6.x installation is no longer able to handle image
> files correctly after installing this test release, then open the
> preferences dialog of LyX 1.6.x and change the path for ImageMagick and
&g
Am 04.10.2010 08:53, schrieb Jean-Pierre Chrétien:
- The installer comes with major updates of third-party programs:
https://developer.berlios.de/project/shownotes.php?release_id=17943
I needed to raise a security exception (invalid data in the berlios
auto-certificate)
You can ignore this (
/developer.berlios.de/project/shownotes.php?release_id=17943
This can cause problems with existing LyX 1.6.x installations. However, I have not yet encountered
problems except of the next item.
- If your existing LyX 1.6.x installation is no longer able to handle image files correctly after
install
Wolfgang Engelmann uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
>
> sorry, just a test, since I am not receiving mail from the list anymore
>
The list server was down for several days, and has apparently been resurrected.
/Paul
sorry, just a test, since I am not receiving mail from the list anymore
Wolfgang
Dear lyx-users,
the 5th alpha release of LyX 2.0.0 is available at:
ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.0/alpha5/LyX-2.0.0alpha5+qt4.dmg
It is build with the development kit of Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) and should be
usable in theory on 10.4 (Tiger) too.
Since I've no such system myself it woul
Testing
This is a test.
EK
Hi all,
Sorry for the test messages. Somewhere between 8/23 @14:00 and 8/24 @ 17:00 my
posts stopped posting. They didn't even post to the archives. This problem was
LyX list specific: lyx-users and lyx-devel but not my other mailing lists.
So I changed the SMTP server through which I
test 20090...@12:36 earth
--
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
test 20090...@12:36 earth
--
Steve Litt
Recession Relief Package
http://www.recession-relief.US
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>> 6. is the file.lyx inside LyX window in read-only mode?
> Yes.
>> 10. is the file.lyx inside LyX window in write mode?
> Yes.
>> 13. is the file.lyx inside LyX window in read-only mode?
> Yes.
>> 14. in A: does the following fail?: svn lock file.lyx
> Yes.
>
> Vince
Pavel Sanda schreef:
hi,
i started implementing another badly missing feature for svn cooperation,
which is automatical locking of files so there is possibility how to
avoid merge conflicts.
i need one confirmation from the windows side of the pond - please is
can anybody report to me whether th
hi,
i started implementing another badly missing feature for svn cooperation,
which is automatical locking of files so there is possibility how to
avoid merge conflicts.
i need one confirmation from the windows side of the pond - please is
can anybody report to me whether the following works in wi
I wrote:
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows.
The installer for this, version 4.11 used the new Python 2.6. Unfortunately I forgot to add some
Python files so that users without having Python installed weren't able to configure
Sherriff, Martyn wrote:
Uwe, thanks for RC5.
Like Murat I cannot read earlier release files. I only have RC5 running on this
PC and when I try to open an RC4 file I get an error message that the file was
created in an earlier version and the lyx2lyx script failed to convert it.
New files are O
Message-
From: Murat Yildizoglu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2008 09:52
To: Uwe Stöhr
Cc: LyX-Docs; LyX-Users; LyX-Devel
Subject: Re: [announce] preview test release of LyX 1.6.0rc5 for Windows
Thanks Uwe,
It works like a charm and I have installed the small version to be used
Eran Kaplinsky wrote:
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
Hi,
I had the same problem, and found that several python modules were missing.
For Imagemagick, what you need is to add functools.py, which you may
find for example at
http://codespeak.net/pypy/dist/pypy/lib/funct
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
2- reconfigure does not work (which probably explains point 1 above):
an error window pops-up saying:
"The system reconfiguration has failed.
Default Textclass is used but LyX may not be able to work properly.
Please reconfigure again
Olivier Ripoll wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
[...]
- fix bug that the installer ignored for some cases when LyX should only
installed for the current user
Hi Uwe,
The installer doesn't create the "lyx16" application data folder for all
users anymore (unless asked to of cours
Just to complete my preceding message. I have been able to restore to RC3
without any problem.
During the test of RC5, I have also observed that LyxLauncher was remaining
open in the background and I had to kill it manually after a long wait. I do
not know if this can hel you to locate the problem
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
[...]
- fix bug that the installer ignored for some cases when LyX should only
installed for the current user
Hi Uwe,
The installer doesn't create the "lyx16" application data folder for all
users anymore (unless asked to of course).
However, it still c
I have tried to make a clean install of RC5: I have uninstalled RC5; I have
renamed my ApplicationData/Lyx16 folder to Lyx16old and erased the lyx keys
from the registry HKCU and HKLM. I have then reinstalled RC5 using Uwe's
installer. I cannot start Lyx anymore. I get the following error:
LyX : r
Eran Kaplinsky schrieb:
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
How did you installed ImageMagick? What ImageMagick version do you use?
regards Uwe
Thanks Uwe,
It works like a charm and I have installed the small version to be used with
TexLive2005.
I have a strange problem with RC5. I have a crash-test latex document of 150
pages with graphics and everything that I try to import in each new
candidate. RC3 is perfectly able to import it but
After using this installer, LyX can't find imagemagick.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out
the new features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc5 is still not a stable release! So you might stum
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fifth release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out the new
features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc5 is still not a stable release! So you might stumble over
regressio
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
This is a bug then. This should only happen when installing for all
users.
I could reproduce it with RC3 too.
Me too, I'll fix this for the next release.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
Although I chose not to install for all users, it created an
application data folder in the administrator folder and for other
users (all administration related users... that's 4 on my machine). Is
this expected ?
This is a bug then. This should only
Olivier Ripoll schrieb:
Although I chose not to install for all users, it created an application
data folder in the administrator folder and for other users (all
administration related users... that's 4 on my machine). Is this
expected ?
This is a bug then. This should only happen when insta
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fourth release candidate of the upcoming
LyX version 1.6.0 for Windows. This release is for interested LyX users
who want to check out the new features of LyX.
Hi Uwe,
Although I chose not to install for all users, it creat
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the fourth release candidate of the upcoming LyX version 1.6.0 for
Windows. This release is for interested LyX users who want to check out the new features of LyX.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc4 is still not a stable release! So you might stumble over regressio
Hello LyX testers,
I uploaded an installer for the third release candidate of the upcoming LyX
version 1.6.0 for Windows.
NOTE: LyX 1.6rc3 is not a stable release! That means it is stable enough for
testing, but expect
inconsistencies and regressions. This preview release is build for interest
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
