Many thanks for the question and answer. This is certainly a problem that I
have been having.
Hal
> On Apr 11, 2022, at 5:11 AM, Pavel Sanda via lyx-users via lyx-users
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:44:54PM -0400, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
>> Like every other free software pro
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 12:44:54PM -0400, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
> Like every other free software project, LyX is underdocumented. The
> lowest hanging fruit you have is to make a single index for all the
> documents available under LyX' help menu. Every time I go there to look
> something
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022, Steve Litt via lyx-users wrote:
In my opinion, this list is so welcoming that there's little remaining low
hanging fruit remaining to make the list even more welcoming, so I still
think enabling non-subscribers to post is unnecessary and has downsides.
+1
Most mail lists r
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes via lyx-users said on Thu, 7 Apr 2022 12:23:13
+0200
>> And what's the supposed upside? So non-subscribers can post. Look at
>> any netiquette guide and they'll roundly catcall the clowns who begin
>> or end their message with "please CC me because I'm not on the
>> list."
go through, other messages get discarded.
There is actually a way to filter e-mails marked as spam, and I have
already changed all our other lists to take advantage of this
information.
Today it is lyx-users' turn. The new behavior is:
* spams are automatically discarded; please notify the
Le 07/04/2022 à 10:12, Steve Litt via lyx-users a écrit :
I'd suggest you put it back the way it was. I'm on 30+ FOSS mailing
lists, and can't police everything to see that it goes through. If some
AI algorithm somewhere decides I'm spam because of my email provider
or whatev
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes via lyx-users said on Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:01:16
+0200
>Dear all,
>
>Until now, the handling of the list was like: messages from
>subscribers go through, other messages get discarded.
>
>There is actually a way to filter e-mails marked as spam, and I have
&g
Le 06/04/2022 à 16:42, Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users a écrit :
I have not gotten yet an answer to my mail March 31 2022; perhaps it
went into the spam?
No, it fell through the cracks because there are few of us active these
days.
Sorry,
JMarc
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users
marked as spam, and I have
already changed all our other lists to take advantage of this
information.
Today it is lyx-users' turn. The new behavior is:
* spams are automatically discarded; please notify the list if a
message of yours just disappears. It seems to work correctly on the
Am 06.04.22 um 16:01 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes via lyx-users:
Dear all,
Until now, the handling of the list was like: messages from subscribers
go through, other messages get discarded.
There is actually a way to filter e-mails marked as spam, and I have
already changed all our other
Dear all,
Until now, the handling of the list was like: messages from subscribers
go through, other messages get discarded.
There is actually a way to filter e-mails marked as spam, and I have
already changed all our other lists to take advantage of this information.
Today it is lyx
Okay, maybe I did not make my situation clear enough: I have *never*
saved the document anywhere before. So there is no specific folder for it.
Daniel
Ok, now I understand, but can not offer more advice. I always create a
save path for a new document
before writing anything.
Sorry,
Gordon
Thanks for that Steve, although I've been working with Koma
Script with the only extra step needed to prevent overlong
lines in PDF was to allow hyperlinks to break over a line end.
Gordon.
On 12/04/15 16:43, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I still don't completely understand. You're saying that if you have the
master document load (so say you have both the master and child open in
tabs) then if you're on the child and you click on preview, then the
child is compiled with the master's prea
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 04:05:28PM +1200, Gordon Cooper wrote:
> On 12/04/15 10:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >I have not made heavy use of child/master documents so I'm just getting
> >started with the basics.
> >
> >If I compile only the child then is the LaTeX preamble still inherited
> >from the
On 12/04/15 10:17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I have not made heavy use of child/master documents so I'm just getting
started with the basics.
If I compile only the child then is the LaTeX preamble still inherited
from the master?
Scott
Hi Scott,
Adding to Richard's reply, I'm using a Master/c
Dear Lyx Users,
This is your mailing list adminm Máté from Memphis, TN. It seems, whenever
you post to the lyx-users list, you get a spam message from a sender
m...@lithasa.ru. At this point, I have no idea what the offending user's
address is because nothing similar to this appears i
It seems like this problem with my TMDA's confirmation
messages being sent out to the list has been resolved now.
Here is a recent excerpt from my TMDA incoming log:
Date: Wed Nov 12 22:00:07 GMT 2008
Sndr: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Manveru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Subj:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Nick Bell wrote:
To: Keith Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Nick Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SPAM Blocking: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Roberts wrote:
Lets see...
Thanks for running those tests Nick. I do keep an eye on my
tmda logs. Here is a re
Seems to work now.
(Sorry for the tests)
Keith Roberts wrote:
Lets see...
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
From: Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SPAM Blocking: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, rgheck wrote:
To: lyx-users ,
LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: rg
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
From: Paul A. Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: SPAM Blocking: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keith Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, rgheck wrote:
To: lyx-users ,
LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: rg
Keith Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, rgheck wrote:
To: lyx-users ,
LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SPAM Blocking: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that this user:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is responsible for the rash of spam blocking m
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, rgheck wrote:
To: lyx-users ,
LyX Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: SPAM Blocking: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It appears that this user:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is responsible for the rash of spam blocking messages that have b
rgheck wrote:
> It appears that this user:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is responsible for the rash of spam blocking messages that have been
> causing such chaos on the list. Can someone please remove this email
> address from the list?
>
> If the person with this email address w
It appears that this user:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is responsible for the rash of spam blocking messages that have been
causing such chaos on the list. Can someone please remove this email
address from the list?
If the person with this email address wishes to subscribe to the list:
Please see
Tim Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any chnace that the developers reconsider to offer a toggle
> read-only /write for the Edit menu?
I do not think so. "Open as read-only would be more useful".
JMarc
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-users&m=115896732208455&w=2
For your convenience, I'm including the text below. Is that what you had in
mind?
Many thanks, that was what I was looking for.
Dear Tim.
It does not come out of the box, but you can include a "Toggle read only mode"
option on the Edit menu by simply following the guidelines in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-users&m=115896732208455&w=2
For your convenience, I'm including the text below. Is that what you had in
mi
I also modified the stdmenus.ui file and included a menu line (see attached
file). I just wonder why the key combination Alt-f Alt-e won't pop up the
open dialog as the alt-f alt-o combination does.
Is there any chnace that the developers reconsider to offer a toggle
read-only /write for the Ed
On Saturday 18 August 2007 16:57, Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
> I also modified the stdmenus.ui file and included a menu line (see attached
> file). I just wonder why the key combination Alt-f Alt-e won't pop up the
> open dialog as the alt-f alt-o combination does.
My bad again...
I mean the (alt-f e) a
OK. My bad.
I copied the cua.bind on the wrong dir. Now it works as instructed. Thanks a
lot for your suggestions.
I also modified the stdmenus.ui file and included a menu line (see attached
file). I just wonder why the key combination Alt-f Alt-e won't pop up the
open dialog as the alt-f
Many Thanks!
It's exacly what i need!
Regards
Valter
Rudi Gaelzer wrote:
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 11:36, Julio Rojas wrote:
Oh, you're right. But I believe that's LaTeX and not LyX. Can anyone help?
Complementing on what I was suggesting, you can completely separate the first
column
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 11:36, Julio Rojas wrote:
> Oh, you're right. But I believe that's LaTeX and not LyX. Can anyone help?
Complementing on what I was suggesting, you can completely separate the first
column by creating a single-column table and then inserting a thin space
(Insert -> Special
On Tuesday 05 June 2007 11:36, Julio Rojas wrote:
> Oh, you're right. But I believe that's LaTeX and not LyX. Can anyone help?
LyX can do it, as well.
Have you tried this?
Insert -> Table... (choose number of rows and columns).
position cursor in any row of the first column and right click ->
ta
> "Rudi" == Rudi Gaelzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rudi> It would be nice if lyx were able to perform cross-reference
Rudi> among unrelated documents, so that the user only has to point to
Rudi> the lyx files and all cross-reference task is automagically
Rudi> performed by lyx.
Yes, this w
On Monday 04 June 2007 09:02, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Trevor" == Trevor Nicholls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Trevor> * The documentation refers to a means of including "external
> Trevor> material", although the available types of external material
> Trevor> do not appear to includ
> Since I updated Suse 9.3 with OpenSuse 10.2 I can´t
> compile Lyx.
> Now I solved the problem when I deleted one option
> of
> configure.
> With --enable-optimization= option I can´t get that
> configure work.
> Without this option I can get that configure and
> make
> work ok.
> But now mak
> > Now, when I run ./configure I get messages that
> said
> > that some libs are founds but configure can´t use
> it.
>
> post your exact configure command and also the tail
> of configure (error) output.
>
> pavel
>
Since I updated Suse 9.3 with OpenSuse 10.2 I can´t
compile Lyx.
Now I solv
> Now, when I run ./configure I get messages that said
> that some libs are founds but configure can´t use it.
post your exact configure command and also the tail
of configure (error) output.
pavel
Hi
I have opensuse 10.2.
In the past I have not problem in to compile lyx from
sources.
Now, when I run ./configure I get messages that said
that some libs are founds but configure can´t use it.
Any idea for to correct this problem?
Thanks.
Marcelo
__
The LyX wiki is occasionally spammed. At first this was done by drug or
gambling ads being inserted in the page text. I blocked this a while back
by prohibiting certain words from being added to wiki pages. This seemed
to be quite successful.
Recently, spammers started editing page without a
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Boyd, Craig wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to print to a file and I keep getting the following message:
Windows cannot find 'and'. Make sure you typed the name correctly,
and then try again. To search for a file, click the Start button,
then click Search.
This message
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 5, 2006 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: ***SPAM*** How to start LyX in a maximized window
To: "H. Skaug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
I am using LyX 1.4.1 under Windows.
Is it possible
I am using LyX 1.4.1 under Windows.
Is it possible to change the settings such that LyX comes
up in a maximized window, rather than the semi-minimized window
as it does now? (Of course, maximization is only a mouse click away,
but still I would like to avoid this).
Wait for 1.5.0... the feature
The Lyx document and the postscript file are attached.
I can view the figure (converted successfully) under windows, using lyx 1.4.2.
Bo
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> christian>If you see something on the wiki you feel is
> christian> inapproriate, feel free to (re)move it yourself! If you're
> christian> uncertain, ask on the user'
> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> If you see something on the wiki you feel is
christian> inapproriate, feel free to (re)move it yourself! If you're
christian> uncertain, ask on the user's list about it. In fact, it's
christian> quite safe to de
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> christian> However, since no one else has given an opinion on this
> christian> I'll just let it rest. It's not like I can't create a
> christian> separate wiki later on :-)
>
> I think we can let it rest for now (although I do not like much
> ad
>>>>> "christian" == christian ridderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
christian> I honestly don't know... in a sense I monitor some of the
christian> stuff what goes on the LyX wiki, primarily in order to
christian> watch out for spam abuse etc.
On 3/24/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm... even though the disk (<1 MB) and bandwith (normal web server)
> requirements would be very small, I can't really offer anything as it's
> not my server.
Have you had a look at existing Wiki farms?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_
Am Donnerstag, 23. März 2006 20:32 schrieb Stephen Harris:
> Stephen (who has converted to: What's the Word? Thunderbird!)
Wow!
Georg
Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Stephen (who has converted to: What's the Word? Thunderbird!)
So now I can read your mails again without being completely confused
wrt quoting style :-)
--
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, since no one else has given an opinion on this I'll just let it
rest. It's not like I can't create a separate wiki later on :-)
cheers
/Christian
We could have a section of the current LyX Wiki devoted to:
Accoutrements for the LyX Publicist
Some pdf files
as that wikis were typically "themed"; the LyX wiki, for
> instance, deals pretty much exclusively with things related to LyX.
As for the theme, I guess it'd still be for the LyX community, although
the material might not be directly related to LyX... that's a theme of
sort
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In case I forgot earlier, many thanks for running the link check!
You didn't forget, but in any case you're quite welcome.
Would a completely separate wiki be an option? It's not that I want a wiki
for non-related LyX stuff, it's only that it'd be nice to be able to
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
> > Anyway, would those of you who use the LyX wiki like a section which
> > isn't related to LyX at all? If so, we could create a separate group
> > for this, or you can create your own personal group (preferably
> > prefixed with 'Personal', as in 'Pers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I'd like some thoughts on the following. Someone named 'Alston' added a
new heading ('CV Writing Services') and a link at the bottom of the page
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Links
My question now is if this is spam?
The feeling I get i
Hi
I'd like some thoughts on the following. Someone named 'Alston' added a
new heading ('CV Writing Services') and a link at the bottom of the page
http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Links
My question now is if this is spam?
The feeling I get in this particular case i
Hi
Someone calling himself Stanley has been trying to ... spam ... a page on
http://wiki.lyx.org twice recently... Both times he's created a new page
called
http://wiki.lyx.org/Field/SideBar-group-Site
Actually, I'm not sure what he is doing since he doesn't seem to know
Dear LyX,
Sorry for sending my letter to your "announce" list.
Here is the body of a letter I received which referred to your list:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:PayPal Security Measures
Date: 25 February 2006 11:01:14 PM
To: lyx-announce@l
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 11:35:11AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I use a filter to put what's likely to be spam in a folder and then
> prune out what's real mail and delete the rest. The problem is that
> every message needs to be opened and then deleted, which doesn'
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use a filter to put what's likely to be spam in a folder and then prune out
> what's real mail and delete the rest. The problem is that every message needs
> to be opened and then deleted, which doesn't work because so mu
I use a filter to put what's likely to be spam in a folder and then prune out
what's real mail and delete the rest. The problem is that every message needs
to be opened and then deleted, which doesn't work because so much spam takes
forever to open due to url lookups & et
On Friday 10 October 2003 15:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently started using LyX as I want to write a document using the
> docbook template supplied with LyX v1.3.3. I installed LyX then
> sgmltools-lite v3.0.3 and reconfigured LyX. LyX detected docbook ok but
> when I opened t
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 10:21:24AM -0700, James Frye wrote:
> If spam - even spam without worms & viruses - is getting spread by
> the list server, it's far more likely to get read by people who see
> "Lyx" in the title, and so think it's good stuff.
Since so m
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> That looks like the sobig.f worm. Don't double-click on the attachment,
> if you are reading the email on a Windows machine.
>
> The worm comes in an attached ".pif" or ".scr" or ".exe" file of about 99K
> bytes.
Was there really an attachment (I do
Well, a lot of us, I think. If spam - even spam without worms & viruses -
is getting spread by the list server, it's far more likely to get read by
people who see "Lyx" in the title, and so think it's good stuff.
James
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 05:18:52PM +0200, Katrin Pietzsch wrote:
> Just curiosity: am I the only one who received this mail? According to
> the mail header it was addressed to the list, otherwise i wouldn't have
> posted the topic here.
No, I think I got one as well.
But who cares...
Andre'
Just curiosity: am I the only one who received this mail? According to
the mail header it was addressed to the list, otherwise i wouldn't have
posted the topic here.
Katrin
5, 2003 at 02:50:01PM +0200, Katrin Pietzsch wrote:
> hi list,
>
> no lyx-related question this time. i'm just wondering about a mail i
> got today and another one by the same sender. Since it doesn't make
> much sense to me, i'm wondering whether this mail is truely rela
i
> got today and another one by the same sender. Since it doesn't make
> much sense to me, i'm wondering whether this mail is truely related to
> lyx/ latex or whether this is simply spam.
>
> regards,
> Katrin
>
> Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> > Vo
this mail is truely related to
> lyx/ latex or whether this is simply spam.
Neither LyX nor LaTeX care for screen savers, so this is either spam or,
more probable, some kind of virus.
Andre'
hi list,
no lyx-related question this time. i'm just wondering about a mail i
got today and another one by the same sender. Since it doesn't make
much sense to me, i'm wondering whether this mail is truely related to
lyx/ latex or whether this is simply spam.
regards,
Ka
I just set up a list to discuss spam prevention on the
list. It is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, send a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mate
On Friday 22 March 2002 16:16, Ronald Florence wrote:
> Robin Turner writes:
>
> Some spam is so funny [...]
>
> A certain amount of spam may be inevitable on the mailing list, but I
> suspect I'm not alone in hoping that subscribers won't aggravate the
> annoya
Robin Turner writes:
Some spam is so funny [...]
A certain amount of spam may be inevitable on the mailing list, but I
suspect I'm not alone in hoping that subscribers won't aggravate the
annoyance with commentary on the spam.
In a recent thread on whether to also offer the o
To spam this list once more: I now switched to a new RBL host. This
just means a different database will be checked for spammers by your
listserver. In the next few weeks I will watch closely to see how this new
list works, and I may have to investigate other databases if the present one
turns
relays.mail-abuse.org has changed their service, and my present software
cannot use this service. As a consequence, we might see some relayed spam
to this list. I should be able to fix the problem in the next day or so.
Thx for patience,
Mate
Sorry for offtopic, but some might be affected by this.
Mate Wierdl wrote:
> 1) My server started to get a lot of spam from dialup sources (the
I'm using a dialup line. When I started encountering resistance to
sending of mail from my local sendmail, the easy solu
Mate,
just received a message from your good friend ezmlm that some of the list
messages to me had bounced. Tracking down the reason, I found it was due to
the sendmail/procmail in my new Red Hat 6.1 setup.
Already two weeks ago, I noticed that procmail didn't work properly (that's
when the b
Please read this, it might affect your participation on this list.
1) My server started to get a lot of spam from dialup sources (the
latest spam to the list also came from such a source), and I decided I
will use the service described at
http://maps.vix.com/dul/
I will implement this
83 matches
Mail list logo
