> Use \tag* instead: \stepcounter{equation}\tag*{(\theequation)\Delta}
>
> Guillaume
>
Beautiful! Thank you Guillaume!
Best regards
Le 16/12/2015 23:05, Franci Žižek a écrit :
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and
Paul A. Rubin msu.edu> writes:
> I'm going to assume that you want the marked equations not to interrupt the
> equation numbering scheme. In other words, you want (2.3.3)DELTA consecutive
> between (2.3.2) and (2.3.4), rather than having both a (2.3.3) and a
> (2.3.3)DELTA.
>
> Create a math ma
Franci Žižek gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi
>
> Can someone give me a hint how I could create a different equation numbering
> variant?
>
> Currently all my equations are numbered like: (2.3.2)
>
> For some select equations I would like this to change to: (2.3.3)Δ
> The counting is continuous, som
alpking hotmail.com> writes:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm currently writing my master's thesis with Lyx and I have a question :
>
> Is it possible to number the equations without the number of the section
> before ? For now, when I insert a new numbered formula, it is numbered like
> that : (4.13), m
Am 17.05.2010 21:49, schrieb Nosrat Maghsoudi:
Greetings, I am using LyX to typeset a book in Farsi. Equation numbers
change when referenced. For example (2-12), becomes (21-2). Please help
if you have a solution.
Can you please provide a LyX example file?
I tried to reproduce with the attac
HI Paula
Piece of cake. In LyX, go into Document -> Settings. On the "Document
Class" page there is an area for class options. Put leqno in the
custom options box and it will use the leqno LaTeX option which puts
equations on the left.
-Neil
=
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económica
You got it.
bigblop wrote:
>
>
>
> David Hewitt wrote:
>>
>> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display
>> formula numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>>
>>
>> bigblop wrote:
>>>
>>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>>> correctl
David Hewitt wrote:
>
> This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
> numbering" and you'll get what you want.
>
>
> bigblop wrote:
>>
>> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown
>> correctly in the pdf. But why the same number for all e
This was just discussed recently. Search the archives for "display formula
numbering" and you'll get what you want.
bigblop wrote:
>
> All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly
> in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>
-
David Hewi
Gary wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
> \renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
> Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
>
You can put it in the preamble.
> \renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
> This
Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David, Richard thanks.
David your suggestion worked like a charm.
Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
\renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation
Gary wrote:
> I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
> I'm not exactly sure what class to use.
All of the things you mention can be redefined fairly easily. You might
want to look at the koma-script classes, which have a lot of built-in
customization possibilities. The documentation is very complete. Yo
Gary wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1, 1
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than Equat
.(2.2) becomes
Eq.(2) but the removefromreset has had no effect.
Any ideas.
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 14/08/2006 19:16
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Richard Heck; Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Y
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am ass
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 09/08/2006 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
e
ks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to do this, short of mod
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding "\": [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But a
I mispelt it. What next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly
estion correcty,
> have I mispelt it. What next?
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
> To: Mike Reeks
> Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Equation num
6 15:51
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Jens Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
I'm confused about what you want. Do you want the equations to be
numbered consecutively throughout the document and NOT to be reset in
each section? If so, then the only way to
Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
> To: Mike Reeks
> Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Equation numbering
>
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
>
>
>> Dear Uwe
>> Nearly there.
pelt it. What next?
Mike
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Uwe
Nearly there
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly there. The command in preamble numbers the equation in each
> section .without th
Thanks Jens.
From: Jens Noeckel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 08/08/2006 19:00
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
On Aug 8, 2006, at 9:16 AM, Mike Reeks wrote:
> Dear Uwe
> Nearly ther
/08/2006 21:23
To: Mike Reeks
Cc: Lyx-users; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to
absolute numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document prefe
Mike Reeks wrote:
Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
numbering?
Add this line to your preamble or at the beginning of your document in
ERT (assure that you use amsmath explicitely in the document preferences):
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equa
Use the remreset package, available on CTAN.
Mike Reeks wrote:
> Any idea how to change Eqn numbering from numbering by section to absolute
> numbering?
> Mike
>
>
Ares wroteb:
I tried
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
but i get the error messages:
1) Missing \begin{document}
2) Undefined control sequence.
\numberwithin
{equation}{chapter}
What else should I know?
You have to use AMS-math. Enable it in the menu Document -> Settings ->
M
Liu Feng wrote:
It is great, I got it after set 'reqno' in option by Document class->class
setting.
But I use 'book' class when I start my manuscript, but now it displays
'book(AMS)', what is different between 'book' and 'book(AMS)', I know AMS
presents American Math. Soc., But I wonder if 'b
Liu Feng wrote:
Thank you for expertise response, it works. But the
equation number goes to the left of the equation, I
want it set on the right, could you gave me anothery
key to fix it?
Then you use a special document class or your document uses the option
"leqno" (in LyX's menu Document ->
Liu Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,Sir
> I could not number equations like 5.1, 5.2 within
> section 5.1 in Chapter 5. All eaqutions numbered just
> start from (1),(2) in global way. How to number
> eqaution according to the number of section or the
> number of chapter.
>
I have added
Liu Feng schrieb:
I could not number equations like 5.1, 5.2 within
section 5.1 in Chapter 5.
Add the following line to your LyX document preamble:
\numberwithin{equation}{chapter}
regards Uwe
Thank you very much! The solution you gave me in the first email was OK, but
when I cut and pasted your suggestions I got the first line commented
\numberwithin{section}{chapter}
and because of the wordwrap, I could not realize it immediately! May I suggest
to avoid such a wordwrap for the LaTe
iprmaster schrieb:
Anyway, I get now only two numbers e.g. chnum.eqnum or sectnum.eqnum
(according the \numberwithin arguments).
In the previous version I had chnum.secnum.eqnum.
But this is what you get with this preamble:
\numberwithin{section}{chapter}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\nu
On Monday 10 April 2006 15:51, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> iprmaster wrote:
> > I imported a LyX 1.3 project (i.e. a master.lyx + other *.lyx files
> > included) into the new LyX 1.4 version. Everthing works out of the box
> > but the numbering: now figures and equations do not have the chapter
> > num
iprmaster wrote:
I imported a LyX 1.3 project (i.e. a master.lyx + other *.lyx files
included) into the new LyX 1.4 version. Everthing works out of the box but
the numbering: now figures and equations do not have the chapter number any
more and a single number is used across all chapters.
I
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
In Lyx/Latex how can I control the formatting of the equations numbers. At
present I have
(1.1) (1.2) etc...
what I need is
[1.1] [1.2] etc...
Is there a simple way to do this?
Ad the following line to the preamble:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@@@{[#1]}}
regards U
On Thu, 12 May 2005 10:20:04 +0100 (BST)
Geoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I want to achieve the following and wondered whether it is possible. I
> think it should be can't get it to work.
>
> I have an erray of equations
>
> x=blah
> y=boo eq(1.1)
> z=cow
>
> and I
Hi Geoffrey Lloyd,
I looked at what people answer you, and gothered it with something i
have, to compute this answer:
You would need to add in ERT (Control + L) this:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesubsection.\arabic\{equation}}
Then you would need to use M-N lin Uwn said to place the equations
Hi Geoff,
as a completely newbie, I've been finding ways to cheat to do exactly what you want.
I've attached my effort- doubtless there are much better ways of doing it.
Regards
BrianGeoffrey Lloyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HiI want to achieve the following and wondered whether it is possib
Geoffrey Lloyd wrote:
I have an erray of equations
x=blah
y=boo eq(1.1)
z=cow
and I want a single equation number on the middle line as shown
Number just the second line with the shortcut M-N (not M-n). Or use the
corresponding Menu.
Isn't this described in the userguide?
regards Uwe
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:38:36AM +0200, G. Milde wrote:
> On 3.09.04, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Are you sure you create "displayed" equations in LyX (with Ctrl-Shift-m,
> > the equivalent to LaTeX's \begin{equation}...\end{equation} and not
> > "inline math" (Ctrl-m, i.e. TeX's $...$)
>
> Al
On 3.09.04, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Are you sure you create "displayed" equations in LyX (with Ctrl-Shift-m,
> the equivalent to LaTeX's \begin{equation}...\end{equation} and not
> "inline math" (Ctrl-m, i.e. TeX's $...$)
Also, you can toggle display<->inlay with Alt-m d.
However, when creating
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:30:02PM +1000, Adam Treverrow wrote:
> I can get the equation numbering to work when equations are entered
> using the following ERT:
>
> \begin{equation} \end{equation}
Are you sure you create "displayed" equations in LyX (with Ctrl-Shift-m,
the equivalent to
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:57 am, Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Steven Homolya wrote:
> > See Help -> User's Guide -> Section 5.5: Equation Numbering and Labels
>
> Steve,
>
> Thanks. I realized just after I sent the message that I should have
> mentioned looking in the extended guide. I
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Steven Homolya wrote:
> See Help -> User's Guide -> Section 5.5: Equation Numbering and Labels
Steve,
Thanks. I realized just after I sent the message that I should have
mentioned looking in the extended guide. I assumed -- wrongly -- that it was
too advanced for the users
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 02:18 pm, Rich Shepard wrote:
> If writing in straight LaTeX one can \begin{equation} ... \end{equation}
> to put numbers to the right of equations. Numbering is turned off in
> \begin{displaymath} mode.
>
> LyX appears to support both inline math and display mode math. I hav
I think its as simple as giving it a label.
so make a displayed maths thing
Ctrl-Shift-M
enter something
\pi
then insert a label INTO the equation by going to insert then down to label.
that should do it
oz
Rich Shepard wrote:
If writing in straight LaTeX one can \begin{equation} ... \end
Myriam Abramson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Hi!
>
> Do you always have to number your equations or only when they are
> referred to in the text?
>
> For example, if I introduce an equation thusly:
>
> The bang-bang force is applied to the righ
Myriam Abramson schrieb:
Do you always have to number your equations or only when they are
referred to in the text?
in very short articles with only few equations it makes
sense without a numbering. But in long articles and books
or articles with a lot of euqations I always have them
numbered.
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:10:29AM -0600, Kent Kostuk wrote:
> Here is a link to a minimal example file. I get an error when I try to
> include the LaTeX preamble commands to change the equation numbering format.
>
> http://homepage.usask.ca/~kjk340/ch3_dekel_tsur.lyx
You haev a typo in the prea
Here is a link to a minimal example file. I get an error when I try to
include the LaTeX preamble commands to change the equation numbering format.
http://homepage.usask.ca/~kjk340/ch3_dekel_tsur.lyx
Kent Kostuk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 12:42:31AM -0600, Kent Kostuk wrote:
> When I try this in one of my chapters or my master file when I am trying
> to check the layout of my whole thesis I get an error.
I can't tell from this what is the error. Send a minimal example file.
> \usepackage{natbib}
> \usepack
Torsten Hahn wrote:
> in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
> 1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
> Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers on or of. What
> is the trick ?
http://www.lyx.org/help/mat
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:50:31AM +0100, Torsten Hahn wrote:
> in section 5.4 in he lyx user guide (german) is a eq_array shown, where the
> 1. and 2. equation is numbered and the 3 is not. How can i do that ?
> Pressing "alt m n" like described there turns only all numbers on or of. What
> is
it's works!!
Juan A. Tapia
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:02:58PM -0500, Juan Tapia wrote:
> > what do you mean by preamble...
>
> Use the layout->latex preamble menu,
> enter the text \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the dialog,
> and press OK.
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 01:02:58PM -0500, Juan Tapia wrote:
> what do you mean by preamble...
Use the layout->latex preamble menu,
enter the text \numberwithin{equation}{section} in the dialog,
and press OK.
what do you mean by preamble...
thanks
Juan A. Tapia
On Fri, 14 Sep 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:45:26AM -0500, Juan Tapia wrote:
> > Hi..is me again...
> >
> > When I numerate eqs I follow the procedure given in the 'user's guide'.
> > However the result that I got is
On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 11:45:26AM -0500, Juan Tapia wrote:
> Hi..is me again...
>
> When I numerate eqs I follow the procedure given in the 'user's guide'.
> However the result that I got is (1),(2),...and so on. How can I generate
> numeration like (2.1), (2.2)
Put
\numberwithin{equatio
Thanks all.
I have used the solution proposed byt Herbert and Dekel (a combination), and
it works. I have the number in TOC, but there is no rule I can see declining
that fact. If they return it back then I will worry about that. So, what I
did was to number the sections and use
\renewcomman
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 10:59:24AM +, Remzi Seker wrote:
> Dear Herbert,
>
> Thank you for your help. But to make that command work I have to enable the
> section numbering and I can not have the section numbers appear in the
> section (subsection, sub subsection) headings.
>
> Any idea
Remzi Seker wrote:
>
> Thank you for your help. But to make that command work I have to enable the
> section numbering and I can not have the section numbers appear in the
> section (subsection, sub subsection) headings.
>
> Any idea how I can have the equation numbers with section numbers but
>
Dear Herbert,
Thank you for your help. But to make that command work I have to enable the
section numbering and I can not have the section numbers appear in the
section (subsection, sub subsection) headings.
Any idea how I can have the equation numbers with section numbers but
sections head
Rem wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> In report style, how can I have equations to be numbered by incorporating
> the "section numbers" in?
> I can not show the section numbers in the section titles.
>
> Say I have the section title for section 2 as:
>
> PRELEMINARIES
>
> my first equation should be numbere
Cheers, Herbert. You pointed me in the right direction
again. I've tried to generalise your suggestion so that I
need not keep a reference of the actual equation numbers.
The LaTeX Companion by Goosens et al. describes a package
"calc" on page 468 that allows arithmetic to be performed
on \setcou
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I have a question about equation numbering. Suppose I have an
Angus> equation that I've labelled:
Angus> x^2+y^2=r^2 (eq:circle)
Angus> Later in text I want to print it out again, WITH THE SAME EQ.
Angus> NUMBER so:
Angus> x^2
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> I have a question about equation numbering.
> Suppose I have an equation that I've labelled:
>
> x^2+y^2=r^2 (eq:circle)
>
> Later in text I want to print it out again, WITH THE SAME
> EQ. NUMBER so:
>
> x^2+y^2=r^2 (eq:circle)
>
> Unfortunatel
On Fri, 03 Sep 1999, Damco wrote:
> -The last quation is not directly connected with Lyx but anyway: Does
> anybody know which program should I use to convert JPG (or TIF, GIF)
> pictures to EPS so that they would be compatible with Lyx?
Both ImageMagik ( display ) and gimp do this well.
> Th
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Michael Shannon McPherson wrote:
> Is it possible to do equation numbering according to chapter?
>
> for example the equations in chapter 2 to be numbered as
> 2.1, 2.2, etc...
> the equations in chapter 3 to be
> 3.1, 3.2, etc...
>
> and so on?
>
> Also is it possible to
Hi Michael!
You wrote:
> Is it possible to do equation numbering according to chapter?
>
> for example the equations in chapter 2 to be numbered as
> 2.1, 2.2, etc...
> the equations in chapter 3 to be
> 3.1, 3.2, etc...
>
> and so on?
Sure. You'll have to fiddle with the LaTeX-Preamble, but i
77 matches
Mail list logo
