Stephen Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Paul Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 1:54 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
On 9/14/05, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
They are included *in* the mathm
On 9/14/05, Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> They are included *in* the mathml-fonts package.
In order to update the Wiki site, the above information, Rex, is valid
for all Fedora Cores (FC1, FC2, FC3 and FC4)?
Paul
Stephen Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I didn't follow the whole thread, but if it hadn't already been
pointed out, you used the wrong rpms. lyx and mathml-fonts are both
in Fedora Extras. Either manually download them, or simply enable th
- Original Message -
From: "Rex Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter Flynn"
Is anyone out there using
Peter Flynn wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter Flynn"
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
I just finished installing LyX
"Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it.
Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do.
Let's forget about it, then :)
The points that interest me in that discussion are:
- the fact that the tetex rpms might not be of
> "Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stephen> Unfortunately, I think it is more likely that you forgot it.
Stephen> Do as I say, not as I do.
Let's forget about it, then :)
The points that interest me in that discussion are:
- the fact that the tetex rpms might not be
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Stephen P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
"Stephen&q
> "Stephen" == Stephen P Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My apologies. I hadn't realised I was expected to read all your
>> mails as they arrived.
>>
Stephen> You are not when you act as a contributor to the mailing
Stephen> list. However, Angus wrote: > Stephen, cool it please.
Steph
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> Peter Flynn is an arrogant, ignorant blowhard. I think my expression
> of dissatisfaction was rather moderate. I think your moral intervention
> was a day late and a dollar short and not directed at the instigator.
My apologies. I hadn't realised I was expected to read a
- Original Message -
From: "Angus Leeming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
SH: You've certainly done a good job in establishing your
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> SH: You've certainly done a good job in establishing your unique
> qualifications for your sweeping pronouncements.
Stephen, cool it please.
--
Angus
> "Peter" == Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Even money says that the install script is hard-wired to look
Peter> in wherever RH's tetex puts the texhash (and doubtless
Peter> kpsewhich) binary, instead of relying on the path to pick up
Peter> the right one. No matter, all is no
> "Peter" == Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> Paul A. Rubin wrote:
>> Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
>> these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of
>> whatever user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly,
>> presumab
Peter Flynn wrote:
> All that's required is for the maintainer of the tetex RPMs to use
> up-to-date versions from CTAN, and for the author of the embedded
> install script in the LyX RPM to test for a working kpsewhich instead
> of assuming it's in the location the RH tetex RPMs install it.
It d
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 12:13 PM
Subject: OT: tetex RPMs (was: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:11 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
> 2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*,
Jose' Matos wrote:
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the
- Original Message -
From: "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2005 5:09 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
On Saturday 10 September 2005 17:56, Stephen P. Harris wrote:
Well, I installed LyX with yum install lyx on F
On Saturday 10 September 2005 19:23, Peter Flynn wrote:
> > 2. yum install lyx.
>
> Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
> Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
> that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex f
On Saturday 10 September 2005 17:56, Stephen P. Harris wrote:
> Well, I installed LyX with yum install lyx on FC4.
> But that installs 1.3.5 by default.
No it does not. :-)
The version available in extras is 1.3.6. There was some miscommunication
previously and that was why only 1.3.5 was ava
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
The Windows installation is easy,
We shall see. I'll be installing it under XP/SP2 on a system wit
Stephen P. Harris wrote:
[me]
Previously: No matter, all is now serene.
Oh, how nice. I suppose you were able to get a good screenshot of LyX
--> View --> Tex Information --> Latex classes (*.cls) which displayed a
partial list of your installed classes?
It displayed the whole lot, includin
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Thanks for all your help...it's working, and all I wanted to do was
screenshot it and document the instal
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2005 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The wa
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Sorry, my wording was fuzzy. I don't have a working Linux box handy
these days, but I assume that LyX runs with the permissions of whatever
user is logged in. So if you can run latex directly, presumably when
you run the LyX configure script it has the same permissions.
Paul Smith wrote:
2. yum install lyx.
Aaaaggghhh! *Never*, never, never do this if you already have TeX.
Especially not if you have already carefully removed the outdated mess
that is the RH kludge of tetex, and replaced it with the real tetex from
the TeX Collection DVD.
yum fails to
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
> >
> > I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
> >
> > 1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
> >
> > 2. yum install lyx.
>
> Excellent! Never used yum before,
Paul Smith wrote:
[me]
Is anyone out there using LyX on FC4?
I am using LyX on FC4 with no problem. The way I installed it was:
1. copied my own .lyx directory into my home directory;
2. yum install lyx.
Excellent! Never used yum before, so here goes. I wonder will it work
over the top of
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment co
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Flynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: Problems installing 1.3.6-1 RPMs
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
At the moment co
Peter Flynn wrote:
How do I know what account the LyX postinstall script from the RPM has
picked to run as? The RPM was installed as root, of course, but if LyX
has picked something else to use to run its script, that is hidden from
sight -- what's the best way to find out (and why on earth woul
On 9/10/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
> >>
> >> It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
> >> because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
> >> install from the
> >> TeX Collection DVD.
>
Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird
because they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full
install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get around this? Is the
Paul Smith wrote:
On 9/9/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I
Peter Flynn wrote:
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get around this? Is the postinstall script SUing
On 9/9/05, Peter Flynn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
>
> It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
> they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
> TeX Collection DVD.
>
> How do I get aro
I just tried to install Lyx from the 1.3.6-1 RPMs.
It can't find the commands kpsewhich and texhash, which is weird because
they are both in the global path. The TeX is a new full install from the
TeX Collection DVD.
How do I get around this? Is the postinstall script SUing to some
strange UID
40 matches
Mail list logo
