Re: Mathed completion popup

James Sutherland wrote: Does this also work for normal text editing mode? I have longed for a emacs-style word completing utility in LyX! It appears so yes :-) Abdel. Am 19.02.2008 um 21:38 schrieb Stefan Schimanski: > ... and am on the way to implement completion for the text mode as well.

Re: Mathed completion popup

Does this also work for normal text editing mode? I have longed for a emacs-style word completing utility in LyX! James On 2/20/08 7:56 AM, "Abdelrazak Younes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Görg wrote: >> Hello Hellmut Weber, >> on 2/20/2008 you wrote: >> >>> Great form of documentation

Re: Mathed completion popup

Martin Görg wrote: Hello Hellmut Weber, on 2/20/2008 you wrote: Great form of documentation for the work you have done, my compliments A small progress report of the patch: I made it very generic now and am on the way to implement completion for the text mode as well. You can see a tiny scr

Re: Mathed completion popup

Hello Hellmut Weber, on 2/20/2008 you wrote: > Great form of documentation for the work you have done, my compliments >> A small progress report of the patch: I made it very generic now and am >> on the way to implement completion for the text mode as well. You can >> see a tiny screencast here

Re: Mathed completion popup

Hi Stefan, i gave a look just by coriosity and i am VERY impressed. Great form of documentation for the work you have done, my compliments Cheeers Hellmut A small progress report of the patch: I made it very generic now and am on the way to implement completion for the text mode as well. You

Re: Importance of Mathed seems to be underestimated

Heiko Schröder wrote: Dear list, there is no question: LyX 1.5.0 is a very great jump in improvement if you think about the whole thing. But it seems to me that the importance of a very quick Mathed is underestimated by the development. Rest assured that it is not and that the new

Importance of Mathed seems to be underestimated

Dear list, there is no question: LyX 1.5.0 is a very great jump in improvement if you think about the whole thing. But it seems to me that the importance of a very quick Mathed is underestimated by the development. Although LyX is generally improving its comfort, Mathed goes the opposite way

LyX 1.5.0 beta2 (Linux): Too many disadvantages occur in Mathed

Dear list, although in general LyX was improved in many details, one inconvenience occurs according to Mathed. You can only get the pair of round brackets () but no longer the brackets for sets or the sharp-cornered brackets [] by using ALT-M-8 or ALT-M-9 . cu Heiko Schroeder -- Heiko

Re: Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

On Sunday 19 November 2006 16:53, Georg Baum wrote: > I noticed that problem too with some long formulas. (if you mean the > centering on screen). Yep! That's it. > AFAIK nobody is working on that, and I don't know > either whether it is already in bugzilla. Should I post it? I've never done tha

Re: Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

Am Sonntag, 19. November 2006 19:32 schrieb Rudi Gaelzer: > However, the second problem I reported is not related to instant preview. Has > anyone inspected the file I attached? I think you'll only notice this > problem with equations spanning more than one display window, as it happens > i

Re: Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

On Sunday 19 November 2006 12:51, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My solution was to switch back to 1.3.7. I am happy with LyX again, ever > > since. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/34427/focus=72321 Thanks, Enrico, but I'm using the linux version.

Re: Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My solution was to switch back to 1.3.7. I am happy with LyX again, ever > since. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/34427/focus=72321 -- Enrico

Re: Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

equation, the display jumps to the Apparently, mathed windows dont scroll horizontally. My workaround has been to reduce the screeen fonts to 80% before editing such large formulas (or xy-pic diagrams). > There are some further issues concerning navigation inside math formulas, Yes, it will re

Strange behaviour of mathed and instant preview.

Since I changed to LyX 1.4.3, I've noticed some strange behaviour when editing mathematical formulas and using Instant Preview, which was absent in the 1.3.x versions. I think you can reproduce some of my woes in the attached file. Open it, enable Instant Preview and wait until it renders all

Re: Viewing LaTex Source of MathEd Formulas

Fritz Bein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > using MathEd I can also use LaTex commands like \sum to enter a formula. Is > it also possible to make the LaTex command source visible in the Lyx editor? Yes, it is. Copy a formula and then paste it outside of any math inset. You can also pa

Re: Viewing LaTex Source of MathEd Formulas

> Hi, > using MathEd I can also use LaTex commands like \sum to enter a formula. Is > it also possible to make the LaTex command source visible in the Lyx editor? > Thanks for your help, > Fritz This feature is available in the latest svn version. I do not know when it will be a

Viewing LaTex Source of MathEd Formulas

Hi, using MathEd I can also use LaTex commands like \sum to enter a formula. Is it also possible to make the LaTex command source visible in the Lyx editor? Thanks for your help, Fritz -- Analog-/ISDN-Nutzer sparen mit GMX SmartSurfer bis zu 70%! Kostenlos downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go

Re: Blue Line in MathEd

oblem was. When I upgraded to the latest cvs version of LyX, the default document language was reset to English (as opposed to British). Because of various other problems with MathEd, I was typing stuff out in new documents and copy-pasting. This meant that the stuff did not change from English t

Re: Blue Line in MathEd

Daniel Watkins wrote: I've noticed since I upgraded to 1.4.0cvs that some of my MathEd boxes have a blue line running along the bottom of them. I'm presuming it's not just me who's getting this, and I was wondering why it's there? Does it have some significance that I&#

Blue Line in MathEd

I've noticed since I upgraded to 1.4.0cvs that some of my MathEd boxes have a blue line running along the bottom of them. I'm presuming it's not just me who's getting this, and I was wondering why it's there? Does it have some significance that I'm missing? Cheers, Dan

Re: Delete in MathEd acting unexpectedly

Daniel Watkins wrote: > I'm using 1.4.0cvs. Whenever I'm in a MathEd box and press Delete, the > entire MathEd box is selected, rather than just deleting the following > item within MathEd. This seems counter-intuitive to me, and I was > checking if this was how use of the D

Delete in MathEd acting unexpectedly

Hey list, I'm using 1.4.0cvs. Whenever I'm in a MathEd box and press Delete, the entire MathEd box is selected, rather than just deleting the following item within MathEd. This seems counter-intuitive to me, and I was checking if this was how use of the Delete key was intended to work in

Re: escaping from MathEd in LyX 1.4

exit the MathEd by hitting ESC, upon which the cursor would be placed directly after the math box. I learned to use this over hitting the space key. (One space would be needed to quit a fraction, another to quit MathEd and yet another to type a space after the math. Other times, two spaces woul

escaping from MathEd in LyX 1.4

Hello, I've been playing with LyX 1.4 for a while and it works great! The amount of work obviously put into it is incredible. Thank you guys!! Despite the undeniable improvements, I noticed something a little bit annoying (hindering my quick typing :). I used to exit the MathEd by hi

Re: [announce] final version of LyX/mathed documentation available

On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:45:01PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Go for it. The natives will correct it if they are sufficiently annoyed > | by the abuse of their[1] language. > > Here, here > > (or is it hair, hair?) Annoyed? U bet I notis

Re: [announce] final version of LyX/mathed documentation available

Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Go for it. The natives will correct it if they are sufficiently annoyed | by the abuse of their[1] language. Here, here (or is it hair, hair?) -- Lgb

Re: [announce] final version of LyX/mathed documentation available

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > The final (version 2.1) of my LyX/mathed documentation is available under > > http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/LyXMathebefehle > > I hope that it can answer most of the math-related questions on this list. > &g

Re: [announce] final version of LyX/mathed documentation available

On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > The final (version 2.1) of my LyX/mathed documentation is available under When I first read this, I felt said because it implied to me that there willl not be any more LyX/mathed documentation. But I think there will be---this is,

[announce] final version of LyX/mathed documentation available

The final (version 2.1) of my LyX/mathed documentation is available under http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/LyX/LyXMathebefehle I hope that it can answer most of the math-related questions on this list. The only problem I have: It's still in german because my english isn't good enough.

Re: backslash binding in mathed

On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 05:16:32PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Try 'ert-insert' which is usually bound to C-l. > > This did the trick. > \bind "numbersign" "ert-insert" > > However, it binds regardless of whether I am in math mode or not. We don't have 'local' keybindings (yet...)

Re: backslash binding in mathed

Thanks to Christian and Andre! Christian Ridderström wrote: > > BTW: Is there a function to show the keybindings on the statusbar (like > > the show-key in jed or emacs)? > > I don't think so, but this script: > http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Tools/LyxBindings > can show you all bindings.

Re: backslash binding in mathed

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 05:15:22PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote: > Can I rebind it? Try 'ert-insert' which is usually bound to C-l. > BTW: Is there a function to show the keybindings on the statusbar (like > the show-key in jed or emacs)? I don't think so. Would be a nice-to-have, though... Andre'

Re: backslash binding in mathed

d: > > in my *.kbd keybindings file: > > \kmap \\ \# > \kmap \# \\ > > -> Works only in text, not in mathed. > > in my *.bind keybindings file: > > \bind "numbersign" "math-insert backslash" > \bind "backslash" &qu

backslash binding in mathed

ly in text, not in mathed. in my *.bind keybindings file: \bind "numbersign" "math-insert backslash" \bind "backslash" "math-insert numbersign" -> does insert a literal backslash with Key-# So, what is the name of the function bound to \ in m

Re: [announce] german description of LyX-mathed is available

On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 12:35:37PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > There was a mistake in the description of vertical space in multiline > formulas (Chap. 17). Those who downloaded the documentation yesterday > should update to the new version. > Sorry for the unpleasantness. For some strange reason I

Re: [announce] german description of LyX-mathed is available

There was a mistake in the description of vertical space in multiline formulas (Chap. 17). Those who downloaded the documentation yesterday should update to the new version. Sorry for the unpleasantness. regards Uwe

Re: [announce] german description of LyX-mathed is available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 18:03, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Hello list, > I wrote a documentation of LyX's mathed. > It's a supplementation for the userguide and based on the > LaTeX-commands, because writing formulas with the commands

[announce] german description of LyX-mathed is available

Hello list, I wrote a documentation of LyX's mathed. It's a supplementation for the userguide and based on the LaTeX-commands, because writing formulas with the commands is much faster than doing it with the math-panel. And mathed supports many commands directly. The documentation con

Re: A latex question --- why doesn't mathed work here?

Angus Leeming wrote: > How do I do this without ERT? Forget it, Display mode math. Doh! -- Angus

A latex question --- why doesn't mathed work here?

[$^1$] with a mathed inset, latex fails. Using mathed (fails): A. Alpha\[ ^{1}\] and B. Beta Using ERT (works): A. Alpha$^1$ and B. Beta Any ideas? My latex isn't good enough to understand the difference. Yes, I know that the approach is a hack... -- Angus#LyX 1.3 created this file. For

Re: two mathed questions

Hi Robin, >Interesting, I don't have M-c-f in any of my .bind files, but it works on >my system. Do you know which file contains M-c-f (or M-z-f in a German >LyX)? Or is it hard-coded into LyX itself? Please have a look in the file: /usr/local/share/lyx/bind/menus.bind For the M-c-* commands ple

Re: two mathed questions

ld Greek to work with psfonts. It works ok with default fonts. > You are right, that seems to be a bug in the font-package. Greek > letters are always displayed in roman-style. > > - Original Message - > From: "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[

Re: two mathed questions

ot;Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 5:50 PM Subject: Re: two mathed questions > Hello, > > I too am using LyX 1.2.2 under Cygwin. I'm not familiar with M-z-f, > though; it's not in any of the key bindi

Re: two mathed questions

sfonts. It works ok with default fonts. -- Paul Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 000c01c2b833$d176c560$fe78a8c0@uwe2:">news:000c01c2b833$d176c560$fe78a8c0@uwe2: > I want to handle greek characters in mathed in the same way as latin > characters but it doesn't work. F

two mathed questions

Hello list, I want to handle greek characters in mathed in the same way as latin characters but it doesn't work. For example if I want a character in a bold style and I use the shortcut M-z-f , it doesn't work with the greek ones. Why? Is it a bug or just not supported by LyX? Anoth

Re: underbraces in mathed

Axel Heinrici wrote: > > I am using lyx 1.2. And I am looking for the underbraces in mathed. > Someone from lyx-devel told me they exist. But I did not manage to > find these anywhere in the documentation or the menus. Can someone > tell me where to find this feature. open

underbraces in mathed

Hello I am using lyx 1.2. And I am looking for the underbraces in mathed. Someone from lyx-devel told me they exist. But I did not manage to find these anywhere in the documentation or the menus. Can someone tell me where to find this feature. greetings Axel

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 04:06:41PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > M-m m still works in version 1.2.0. In fact, I managed to insert a multi- > character exponent in boldface by going into math mode, typing ^ to get the > exponent box, then M-m m to go into math text mode, and typing \bf{abc} in >

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 12:06:04PM +0200, Ronald Pagel wrote: > This way one can only put one character into \mathrm - mode. In 1.2, but any number in 1.3.0cvs. > Sometimes I want to use names as indices. They have to appear in > formulas exactly the same like in the text above (i.e. not italic

Re: {} in mathed

Wayan wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > >>I'd type 1 ^ \ m a t h r m x and it works at least with current >>1.3.0cvs. This way one can only put one character into \mathrm - mode. > Yes, you are right... I have typed {} after \mathrm. This seems to be only > work in pr

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 10:30:15AM +0200, Wayan wrote: > Yes, you are right... I have typed {} after \mathrm. This seems to be only > work in previous version. Thank's anyway. Btw, what is new features in lyx > 1.3.0cvs? Massive redrawing problems currently. Andre' -- Those who desire to give

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > By typing \mathrm. > > > If I made a 1^x (like a house-number in my country), I typed "1 C-m ^ (to > > rise up) then x (as subscript)". Without \mathrm x is in italic. > > I'd type 1 ^ \ m a t h r m x and it works at least with current > 1.3.0cvs.

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 09:46:16AM +0200, Alain Castera wrote: > Yes, but it seems not to work anymore with \mathrm{ IIRC, it worked on > 1.1.5, may be 1.1.6. > > Everytime I try to convince TeX users to try LyX, I have in the end to > explain that they will be able to enter math formulae exa

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > I'd type 1 ^ \ m a t h r m x and it works at least with current > 1.3.0cvs. It should with 1.2.0, too. Yes, but it seems not to work anymore with \mathrm{ IIRC, it worked on 1.1.5, may be 1.1.6. Everytime I try to convince TeX users to try

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, Jun 28, 2002 at 08:59:40AM +0200, Wayan wrote: > > Unadorned {} fo grouping and \{...\} if you need the characters. > > How can I put \mathrm in mathmode? By typing \mathrm. > If I made a 1^x (like a house-number in my country), I typed "1 C-m ^ (to > rise up) then x (as subscript)". W

Re: {} in mathed

On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Yes. It's exactly the way you would type them in LaTeX. > > Unadorned {} fo grouping and \{...\} if you need the characters. How can I put \mathrm in mathmode? If I made a 1^x (like a house-number in my country), I typed "1 C-m ^ (to rise up) then x

Re: {} in mathed

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:50:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I see the point to link the brackets to some 'red text' after you type a > command, but not in the middle of the formula. > Is there a justification to this behaviour ? Yes. It's exactly the way you would type them in LaTeX. Un

{} in mathed

Hello, To type a set in mathed, {a,b}, my first movement was to use the bracket keys, the same way I use the parenthesis when I don't need a too beautiful delimiter. However the brackets are displayed in red and, bad surprise, are not in the output. I see the point to link the brackets to

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

Thanks for your indications. Best regards Carlo

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

Thanks for your indications. Best regards Carlo

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:58:02PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > > In fact, they should be handled identically internally. ... concerning read/write behaviour of the structure. Andre' -- André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 03:33:59PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 02:18:34PM +0100, Carlo Ferri wrote: > > Both the hints: > > 1) C-m > > 2) C-m > > 3) H > > and > > 1) C-m > > 2) M-m r (M-c r as in the user guide) > > 3) H > > Seems to work fine. They seem to produce the sa

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:41:12PM +0100, Carlo Ferri wrote: > And , by the way, can you perhaps tell me something of my curiosity about > copying from the log_file inside Lyx, and the "error messages" and copying > to a text a file, for instance in kjots? LyX creates a temp dir, usually /tmp/ly

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

Thank you for your kind assistance. I will go through my text and I will make the necessary adjustments with C-m, C-m . And if it does not work? Argh! I can only hope it will work, as in the short test I have done. And , by the way, can you perhaps tell me something of my curiosity about copying f

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

\left( \mu ^{2}+\sigma ^{2}\right) \) > \end_inset > > results in: > > formula disappeared after saving the file, closing it and re-opening it. > ----- This seems to be indeed a problem of the old mathed parser. The formul

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

First, my name is now visualized (I hope so). Please be patient with me if I often use crlfr. Second: as in your hint, I have seen the user guide §5.6.1. Before I made a mistake, I unintentionally skip it, and I checked "advanced..". Sorry. third: I'm using lyx1.1.6fix3 on GNU/Linux Mandrake 8.

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:36:25PM +0100, Crlfr wrote: [If I was given that name --^ I would sue my parents...] > Hello everybody. > I've got a new problem. > I need to insert roman characters in some formulas instead of > Italic/emphatized. I tried: > 1) C-m

Re: Roman characters in Mathed.

On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 09:36:25PM +0100, Crlfr wrote: > Hello everybody. > I've got a new problem. > I need to insert roman characters in some formulas instead of > Italic/emphatized. I tried: > 1) C-m, to activate mathed; > 2) click on the button for the TeX mode; >

Roman characters in Mathed.

Hello everybody. I've got a new problem. I need to insert roman characters in some formulas instead of Italic/emphatized. I tried: 1) C-m, to activate mathed; 2) click on the button for the TeX mode; 3) \textrm{H} if I need H, for istance. All this seems to work fine, because I can have

Re: MathEd...

On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Renaud MICHEL wrote: > Le Lundi 7 Janvier 2002 18:24, vous avez écrit : > > Is there an option that I need to set to get this to work? > > In the Edit menu there is an entry math panel which will open the... math > panel that contain all the mathematical functions (superscript

Re: MathEd...

Le Lundi 7 Janvier 2002 18:24, vous avez écrit : > Is there an option that I need to set to get this to work? In the Edit menu there is an entry math panel which will open the... math panel that contain all the mathematical functions (superscript, math symbols, intégrals, matrix, ...), have a l

Re: MathEd...

On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 12:24:34PM -0500, jbw wrote: > I am new to lyx and just installed it and I am proceeding through the > tutorial. When I reached the part regarding math equations it doesnt seem > to work for me. I press the math mode key enter E=mc2 and nothing happens. You should type s

MathEd...

I am new to lyx and just installed it and I am proceeding through the tutorial. When I reached the part regarding math equations it doesnt seem to work for me. I press the math mode key enter E=mc2 and nothing happens. I view the doc in DVI and it still appears the same. The 2 in the equation

Re: Saving in Mathed?

On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 12:55:44AM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > > I think this is fixed in current CVS. > > > > But there are certainly other reasons not to use it... > > What should not be used: CVS version or saving in MathEd? Nevertheless, > thanks for the informati

Re: Saving in Mathed?

On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 05:51:10PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:04:41PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > > I am now writing my assignement for a Math class (so I am mostly in > > Mathed all the time) and it seems to me annoying, that whenever I save a > &g

Re: Saving in Mathed?

On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:04:41PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote: > I am now writing my assignement for a Math class (so I am mostly in > Mathed all the time) and it seems to me annoying, that whenever I save a > document (via Ctrl-S), LyX leaves MathEd. Can I do something about that >

Saving in Mathed?

Hi, I am now writing my assignement for a Math class (so I am mostly in Mathed all the time) and it seems to me annoying, that whenever I save a document (via Ctrl-S), LyX leaves MathEd. Can I do something about that or it is an undocumented feature? Have a nice day

Re: Multiline Mathed Bug??

Aaron Broad wrote: > > From reading the manual I found that you can create multiline math > functions by pressing control-enter in the mathed box. But when I do it > it doesn't seem to work. Am I misreading the manual or is this a bug. I suppose you have 1.1.6 this works o

Multiline Mathed Bug??

Hi, From reading the manual I found that you can create multiline math functions by pressing control-enter in the mathed box. But when I do it it doesn't seem to work. Am I misreading the manual or is this a bug. I'm using the version that comes with Debian SID. Its version

Re: mathed question...

Herbert wrote: >> >>in latex preamble >> >>\newcommand{\dv}[1]{% dot over vector, e.g. \dv{\omega} >> \dot{\vec{#1}}% >>} >> >>in the lyx mathbox write \dv and an open parenthesis { and >>than whatever you need. Why not a LyX Macro

Re: mathed question...

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Herbert Voss wrote: > Baruch Even wrote: > > > > This is something that is limited in latex itself and not only in LyX, > > though LyX should know to convert it to the correct format. ... but latex IS able to correctly compile my hand-modified version, \dot{\vec{\omega}} so

Re: mathed question...

Baruch Even wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Eric St-Jean wrote: > > > actually, i just subscribed to this list... i couldn't find any list of > > known bugs on lyx.org or devel.lyx.org; please forgive me if i'm > > submitting something you've seen already, and point me to such a list of > > know

Re: mathed question...

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Eric St-Jean wrote: > actually, i just subscribed to this list... i couldn't find any list of > known bugs on lyx.org or devel.lyx.org; please forgive me if i'm > submitting something you've seen already, and point me to such a list of > known bugs if it exists. > > Here's t

mathed question...

actually, i just subscribed to this list... i couldn't find any list of known bugs on lyx.org or devel.lyx.org; please forgive me if i'm submitting something you've seen already, and point me to such a list of known bugs if it exists. Here's the thing: in an equation, if i type \dot \vec x i'l

RE: ANYONE? Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

On Fri, 17 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > Thanks for your help Allan. I found that what you wrote works with the > "article" layout but not with the "IEEEtran". I found however a way to do > all the bold characters and the new numbering in the Appendix using TeX and > I will mail it to the list later.

RE: ANYONE? Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

nal Message- > From: Allan Rae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 16 December, 1999 8:14 PM > To: Lyx1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ANYONE? Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > > > Would

Re: ANYONE? Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > Would anyone know at least a possible place for me to look for a solution to > these problems? The problem with pressing M-c b is that whatever else I type > after that is bold as well and I can't change it. Change to bold _after_ you written _everything_ in th

ANYONE? Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

L PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 16 December, 1999 12:43 AM > To: Lyx1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd > > > On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > > > Sorry to bother you again but I looked at the example IEEE > arti

RE: Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

On Wed, 15 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > Sorry to bother you again but I looked at the example IEEE article and it > didn't use eqn numbers in the Appendix. I am also not sure what do you mean > about the appendix command/enviro from the paragraph style menu. I totally misread your question originally

RE: Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

in a different math box but this fails when I am in display mode. Any ideas? Thanks Paris > -Original Message- > From: Allan Rae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 14 December, 1999 9:36 PM > To: Lyx1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Equations in the Apendix, Bo

RE: Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

in a different math box but this fails when I am in display mode. Any ideas? Thanks Paris > -Original Message- > From: Allan Rae [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, 14 December, 1999 9:36 PM > To: Lyx1 > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Equations in the Apendix, Bo

Re: Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Lyx1 wrote: > Hello > > I have some equations in my appendix and would like to have numbers like A1, > A2, etc for them instead of continuing the numbering from the main section. > Is there a way to do this? I am using IEEEtran. >From memory, you just use the appendix comma

Equations in the Apendix, Bold characters in MathEd

Hello I have some equations in my appendix and would like to have numbers like A1, A2, etc for them instead of continuing the numbering from the main section. Is there a way to do this? I am using IEEEtran. I am also trying to get the variables referring to matrices in bold but it seems that eve

Arrays in mathed

Hello, Dealing with arrays in mathed leaves me often with empty cells (marked with a blue rectangle). I cundestood fron the doc that killing a row is possible, but not a column. However, I often get a uncomplete row with missing cells and empty cells, which is not killed by M-e k. Is there a

Re: Unbolding in Mathed

> "Etienne" == Etienne Grossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Etienne> Hello, Etienne> the following patch seems to work. However, I am quite sure Etienne> that it breaks something. Alejandro Aguilar Sierra certainly Etienne> has a better idea. Etienne> So if you apply this patch, reme

Re: Unbolding in Mathed

Hello, the following patch seems to work. However, I am quite sure that it breaks something. Alejandro Aguilar Sierra certainly has a better idea. So if you apply this patch, remember, there is a risk!!! Etienne first, cd to the lyx directory, cat > mypatch

Re: Unbolding in Mathed

Just a little typo M-C b & M-C Space should be M-c b & M-c space. >Hi, this is my first post (Huzzah!) and I couldn't find this info in the >archive. > >After reading the User Guide i figured out you could bold expressions in >Mathed with M-C b, which is great. Th

Unbolding in Mathed

Hi, this is my first post (Huzzah!) and I couldn't find this info in the archive. After reading the User Guide i figured out you could bold expressions in Mathed with M-C b, which is great. The user guide also says to go back to the default you type M-C Space, which doesn't work for