On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 12:59:33AM +, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Dave Tweten wrote:
>
> it's a solution without \footnoteref. the command \sups
> for superscript is defined in latex preamble.
>
> hope this helps.
It is better to use
\newcommand\sups[1]{\textsuperscript{\rm #1}}
>
> it's a solution without \footnoteref. the command \sups
^
sorry, \footnotemark
it's a little bit late ... ;-)
Herbert
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://perce.de/lyx/
Dave Tweten wrote:
>
> footnotemark to refer to it from another section heading. In spite of the
> footnotemark being protected, I got the error message:
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> >can you give a short lyx-example file?
>
> Yes. It is attached.
dito ...
it's a solution without \footn
footnotemark to refer to it from another section heading. In spite of the
footnotemark being protected, I got the error message:
Missing number, treated as zero.
...on\protect\footnotemark[\ref{foot:first}]}
A number should have been here; I inserted `0'.
(if yo
Dave Tweten wrote:
> >>Is this just not possible, or can someone show me how to get what I'm looking
> >>for?
>
> >You should put protect _only_ before \footnotemark, namely
> >\protect\footnotemark[\ref{foot:div}]
>
> Yes. Following my usual procedure for this sort of experimental computer
> s
Initially quoting me, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> Missing number, treated as zero.
>> ...ect\footnotemark[\protect\ref{foot:div}]}
>> A number should have been here; I inserted "0".
>> (If you can't figure out why I needed to see a number,
>> look up `wierd error' in the i
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 09:53:19PM -0800, Dave Tweten wrote:
> This time, I need for both the original footnote and the \footnoteref to be in
> section headings. In spite of adding \protect's everywhere I can think to do
> so, I'm left with the following LaTeX error at the \footnotemark:
>
>
Dave Tweten wrote:
>
> In previous situations, I've been able to use the LaTeX "\footnoteref" command
> with a Lyx reference to a label in another footnote, with no problems. Not
> surprisingly, the result is a second mark pointing to the same footnote.
>
> This time, I need for both the origin
In previous situations, I've been able to use the LaTeX "\footnoteref" command
with a Lyx reference to a label in another footnote, with no problems. Not
surprisingly, the result is a second mark pointing to the same footnote.
This time, I need for both the original footnote and the \footnoter
