Re: Shortcut for "math-delim Vert Vert" not working

2011-04-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > Done. thanks, pavel

Re: input of LaTeX Code

2011-04-14 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Am Donnerstag, 14. April 2011 schrieben Sie: > On 04/14/2011 11:03 AM, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I do generate a table in LaTeX source format. I included it in a LyX > > document using ERT and then \input{file.tex}. That worked well. The > > trouble starts, when I do that in a subdoc

Re: Shortcut for "math-delim Vert Vert" not working

2011-04-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/13/2011 04:35 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Pavel Sanda wrote: Yang Zhang wrote: I put this in my user.bind: \bind "M-m M-m S-Bar" "math-delim Vert Vert" This was actually auto-generated by adding a new shortcut in Tools> Preferences. But after closing and going back to that Preferences dialo

Re: input of LaTeX Code

2011-04-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/14/2011 11:03 AM, Rainer Dorsch wrote: Hello, I do generate a table in LaTeX source format. I included it in a LyX document using ERT and then \input{file.tex}. That worked well. The trouble starts, when I do that in a subdocument, which is not in the same directory as the toplevel documen

Re: article-koma script

2011-04-14 Thread stephen's mailinglist account
>> I have a problem with Koma-Script title page. I would like to see `Abstract` >> title in my output file with `Article-Koma Script `document type. When I >> choose `abstract` environment , I can not see `abstract` title in the output >> file. >> How can i add `abstract` title to my document. >> I

input of LaTeX Code

2011-04-14 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, I do generate a table in LaTeX source format. I included it in a LyX document using ERT and then \input{file.tex}. That worked well. The trouble starts, when I do that in a subdocument, which is not in the same directory as the toplevel document. Then I need to specify the relative path

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 04/14/2011 05:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!) See the other thread on how there are too many options already! Richard

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Rainer M Krug
> It definitely is not easy to get 100% right, 80% would be interesting > enough. I disagree on the desktop search bit, that is mostly helpful > if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. > > I would find a name-suggester that would take: > > The current date, e.

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Diego Queiroz
> maybe I'm a bit old fashioned (born in 1943 ;-). So I do not have this terrible need to do everyzhing the fastest way possible. I'm young (born in the 80's) and I confess I'm neurotic about automatization (much over the normal). Sorry if I am too boring sometimes. I enjoy to make the computer de

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Walter van Holst
lpful if you know a lot about the document you are looking for. I would find a name-suggester that would take: The current date, e.g. 20110414, an abbreviation of the style you are using, for example 'LTR' for letters and the subject of the document plus a version number useful.

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote: > Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right? > As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything > should be fine. Believe on me. :-) > And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose > the

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 13.04.2011 um 17:22 schrieb Diego Queiroz: > > I would encourage people to think a few seconds how to call their > > documents. That will save some time in searching for them later on. > > You get the point! > And how can LyX aid users to achieve this? Yes, you guessed right! Proposing > fil

Re: A basic requested feature

2011-04-14 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sam Lewis wrote: >> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of >> LyX, and not block good ideas. > > Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on > functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it > needs t