Re: maths fonts in FoilTex

2003-01-17 Thread Paul A. Rubin
[posted and mailed] *Should* it work on Greek letters? Is there such a thing as Greek letters in teletype font (let alone Fraktur)? I know that you need the assistance of an extra LaTeX package to get bold Greek symbols. There seem to be two choices: \usepackage{amsbsy} lets you wrap the

Re: maths fonts in FoilTex

2003-01-17 Thread Paul A. Rubin
[posted and mailed] Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:30:02PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: >> It may not have anything to do with FoilTeX. I've noticed in LyX >> 1.2.3 that typing the LaTeX font commands in math mo

how to chnage export process relative to include process?

2003-01-17 Thread Bill Welch
Using noweb, I'd like to export to noweb *after* includes are processed. Is that configurable or is it a code change (and, if so, roughly where should I start)? Clearly, some 'exports', namely printing, take place after includes are processed, so the mechanism is there - just need to move expor

Re: Compiling lyx 3.0 - missing binary?

2003-01-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "robin" == robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: robin> I ran ./configure --with-frontend=qt (after the autogen stuff) robin> on LyX 3.0 (CVS) and got the following error message: robin> configure: error: moc binary not found in $PATH or /bin ! robin> What is moc? It is a preprocessor for qt

Compiling lyx 3.0 - missing binary?

2003-01-17 Thread robin
I ran ./configure --with-frontend=qt (after the autogen stuff) on LyX 3.0 (CVS) and got the following error message: configure: error: moc binary not found in $PATH or /bin ! What is moc? Robin -- "A Perl script is "correct" if it gets the job done before your boss fires you." - Larry Wall

Re: Chapter* and header

2003-01-17 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:12:46PM +0100, Lars Risan wrote: > After my 10 regular chapters I have two small chapters where I use the > Chapter* environment (ommitting "chapter NUMBER"). My problem is that in > these final chapters* the headers remain the same as in the last regular > chapter and

Re: Chapter* and header

2003-01-17 Thread Lars Risan
SORRY! forget it. I am a bit too fast on the send-button. I figured it out. (ERT: \renewcommand{\rightmark} {MyChapter*title} \renewcommand{\leftmark} {MyChapter*title} )

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:12:46PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Unfortunately. > > A HA ! Now I have you on record as wanting to be user unfriendly :) I will change my mind if it suits my secrets plans. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor

Chapter* and header

2003-01-17 Thread Lars Risan
Hi all, After my 10 regular chapters I have two small chapters where I use the Chapter* environment (ommitting "chapter NUMBER"). My problem is that in these final chapters* the headers remain the same as in the last regular chapter and section. How do I change them to reflect the actual chapte

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:08:15PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Which do you think is the more user-friendly option? > > John's disease is spreading. ;-) > > Unfortunately. A HA ! Now I have you on record as wanting to be user unfriendly :) regards john -- "Life is like a clock: You c

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:13:38PM +, José Matos wrote: > a) the file format wins > b) the lyx versions wins > c) we abort as the user is really confused c) > Which do you think is the more user-friendly option? > John's disease is spreading. ;-) Unfortunately. Andre' -- Those

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread José Matos
On Friday 17 January 2003 11:46, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > What is the interface you are thinking about? Using new options? Just > > for for the output format? > > New options. Output is probably sufficient as input is auto-detected. Agreed. In the case where both are present what shall we do?

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:35:28AM +, José Matos wrote: > > BTW, Jose, an idea for lyx2lyx, for people who want to run it by hand: > > it would be nice to specify the format as a lyx version number, since > > noone really knows what is the right format for lyx 1.2.0, for example. > > What i

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread José Matos
On Friday 17 January 2003 09:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > José> On Thursday 16 January 2003 13:30, Matej Cepl wrote: > >> There should be script lyx2lyx somewhere around www.lyx.org, which > >> should help. > > José> That comes with

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Thursday 16 January 2003 13:30, Matej Cepl wrote: >> There should be script lyx2lyx somewhere around www.lyx.org, which >> should help. José> That comes with 1.3.0pre... But we could also distribute it separately, no? BTW, Jose,

Re: Letter Opening ?

2003-01-17 Thread Nicolas Ferre'
Thanks for the hint, I tried to convert my letter to g-brief. However, lyx crashed saying: We failed to find the layout 'Standard' in the layout list. You MUST investigate! lyx: SIGSEGV signal caught ... thus I "investigated". I tried to start from scratch a new g-brief letter, incorporating the

Re: maths fonts in FoilTex

2003-01-17 Thread David Norris
Even stranger. Paul's solution works for me, but not on Greek letters. David Andre Poenitz wrote: On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:30:02PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: It may not have anything to do with FoilTeX. I've noticed in LyX 1.2.3 that typing the LaTeX font commands in math mode (either

Re: LyX2XXX with math???

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 08:33:58AM +, José Matos wrote: > After dealing with dealing with the visitor pattern. Duedelue... > > [José: Why?] The question is: Why don't we allow .xml export for arbitrary styles, e.g. plain "article" and need some fancy other style? What's the big difference

Re: LyX2XXX with math???

2003-01-17 Thread José Matos
On Friday 17 January 2003 08:03, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: > > Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and > > tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option* > > where is it??? > > You need to select

Re: Figure number in section heading

2003-01-17 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:49:16AM +1030, Paul Medwell wrote: > I don't mean this to be a big issue - I'm quite happy to use the command > in the pre-amble. > > For your information, I have attached an example file that doesn't work > on my machine with the label in upper-case. The label still

Re: LyX2XXX with math???

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:47:33PM -0100, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Well I downloaded and compiled 1.2.3, created a new document, and > tried to export it to docbook, but alas I cannot see *this option* > where is it??? You need to select a adequate document style in layout->document. SGML article (Doc

Re: maths fonts in FoilTex

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 06:30:02PM +, Paul A. Rubin wrote: > It may not have anything to do with FoilTeX. I've noticed in LyX 1.2.3 > that typing the LaTeX font commands in math mode (either typing \mathtt > {...} directly or hitting the TeX/ERT button and then typing mathtt{...}) > does not