John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hello,
>
| I've finished A. Klostermann's reference dialog, and in the process
| added something to ControlRef which may or may not please. The function
| added (gotoAnotherRef) is simply a version of gotoRef which does not set
| the bookmark for the "Back
Will it be possible in the next version of Lyx installer
to add in ..\bind directory the file hebrew.bind ?
Zvi Altshuler
Israel
\bind_file cua
\bind "F12" "language hebrew"
John Spray wrote:
> While I was waiting for my fresh LyX to compile on my new Ubuntu system,
> I wrote the following:
A real candidate for the "poem of the month".
Jürgen
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
| addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access
| to frontends/gtk, I think).
Lars> Is it not possible to do this without changes to ControlR
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:04 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access to
> | frontends/gtk, I think).
>
> Is it not possible to do this without changes to Control
> "John" == John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> So I know it's been a tough day and we're both tired.
John> But we're not going to bed until we've finished what we started.
John> That means I'm going to sit here grinding my teeth while my new
John> system compiles you.
Well,
On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:31 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access
> | to frontends/gtk, I
Currently, we have quite a few different expressions for spelling,
which is a bit unfortunate. You can get them by
grep -i spell po/lyx.pot | grep -v '^#:'
By categories:
1/ the thing itself
spell checker
spellchecker
spell-checker
2/ the fact of doing it
spellchecking
spell-checking
spell chec
Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
> I use comment ("insert note") feature a lot in LyX. Would it be difficult
> to make it possible to output these comments to PDF/print as well? I
> imagine some kind of grey boxes (or balloons) in the margin with the notes.
I have just uploaded a little style file to the w
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Janus Sandsgaard wrote:
>> I use comment ("insert note") feature a lot in LyX. Would it be
>> difficult to make it possible to output these comments to PDF/print
>> as well? I imagine some kind of grey boxes (or balloons)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars, would you be OK with the 1.4.x version of the patch?
Let's try this.
| Index: src/insets/insetlatexaccent.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/insets/inse
John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 2005-08-04 at 10:04 +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Patches attached. I won't apply this GRef until someone loves the
>> | addition to ControlRef enough to commit it (I only have write access to
>> | frontends/gtk, I think).
>>
>> Is it no
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Lars, would you be OK with the 1.4.x version of the patch?
Lars> Let's try this.
Well, I a subsequent message I decided to give up with the patch. It
gives ugly results
Following some private discussions with Hartmut, I propose the
following trivial patch to improve the error boxes.
Lars, OK?
JMarc
Index: src/frontends/controllers/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/fronte
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Following some private discussions with Hartmut, I propose the
| following trivial patch to improve the error boxes.
>
| Lars, OK?
Yes, even if I am a bit reluctant to change _() strings now.
we are not at 1.4.x quite yet.
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> Following some private discussions with Hartmut, I propose the |
Lars> following trivial patch to improve the error boxes.
>>
Lars> | Lars, OK?
Lars> Yes, even if I am a
It turns out that bug 1922 (navigating allsymbols.lyx is extremely
slow) can be solved by configuring with --disable-stdlib-debug.
That raises a question: is it really wise to turn this on by default?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It turns out that bug 1922 (navigating allsymbols.lyx is extremely
| slow) can be solved by configuring with --disable-stdlib-debug.
>
| That raises a question: is it really wise to turn this on by default?
We should at least report this to the
I've been trying since yesterday to modify the LyX/Mac wiki page, to
no avail. I've got the right password, I can get to the edit page,
but when I try submitting or previewing my changes, my web browser
just hangs forever with the message "Waiting for wiki.lyx.org".
Eventually, I get a new
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> It turns out that bug 1922 (navigating allsymbols.lyx is
Lars> extremely | slow) can be solved by configuring with
Lars> --disable-stdlib-debug.
>>
Lars> | That raises a q
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> We should at least report this to the gcc dudes. Or at least
| Lars> figure out if stdlib-debug is supposed ot have runtime impact.
>
| Well, if it does run-time checking of the validity of iterator it sure
| has impact. Actually, what shows
Zvi Altshuler wrote:
> Now I am trying to do the same for version 1.3.6
> but I could not find the file "preferences"
> my question :
> is there somewhere a file where all modified preferences created by
> the user are saved?
Hi, Zvi.
There *can be* a file "preferences" that has been created by t
William F. Adams wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Ouch! that is not very informative, is it?
>>
>> Is it dureing the install or when running LyX?
>
> It's during the install, right after I've okayed all of the programs
> / file locations &c. and it actually
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote:
> If I detach the "greek" panel, I obtain "greek-panel.png" below.
> If I minimize it and then restore it, I obtain "greek-restored.png"
> which is incomplete.
Oh, cool! Thanks, Ekkehart. I'll go tell the Qt/Win Free guys.
--
Angus
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> yes I think so,
> and we should already know to not use this for profiling builds.
Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by
default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught.
Ca
langev langev wrote:
> I just installed the new official Windows version
> under XP. I had been using Ruurd's ports on and off
> for about a year. (The ability to reliably use spaces
> in filenames is great, by the way.) I noticed two
> problems that I don't remember running into
> previously:
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:24:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> yes I think so,
>> and we should already know to not use this for profiling builds.
>
| Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by
| default - daily use o
Hi, Jean-Marc. It looks like gmane is missing a bunch of messages that
were posted whilst it was down this morning, this one being one of
them. Anyway, copying from mail-archive.com...
> Currently, we have quite a few different expressions for
> spelling, which is a bit unfortunate. You can get th
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> msgid "How far spellchecking has got"
| "Proportion of document checked" or "Proportion of the document
| checked"
>
>> msgid "Check spelling"
| "Check the spelling" ?
Run spellchecker
>
>> msgid "Spell-checking is complete"
| I guess that the noun he
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:21:54PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > msgid "Spell command:|#S"
> Name of spellchecker executable:
Bit wordy. "Spellchecker command" ?
> > msgid "Check spelling"
> "Check the spelling" ?
Hmm really ?
john
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:21:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by
> | default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught.
>
> turn off all debuging if trying to gauge whre LyX is wrt performance.
> As
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> msgid "Check spelling"
> | "Check the spelling" ?
> Run spellchecker
Good.
>>> msgid "Spell-checking is complete"
> | I guess that the noun here is "spelling", so "Spelling check
> | complete" or "The spelling of all words has been checked".
> All words has been ch
John Levon wrote:
>> > msgid "Spell command:|#S"
>> Name of spellchecker executable:
>
> Bit wordy. "Spellchecker command" ?
I'd like to get the idea of "executable" in there somehow. The
offending widget is permanently disabled in the Windows port because
we force these users to use the [ap]spel
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 04:59:51PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Bit wordy. "Spellchecker command" ?
>
> I'd like to get the idea of "executable" in there somehow. The
> offending widget is permanently disabled in the Windows port because
> we force these users to use the [ap]spell library.
Ha
John Levon wrote:
>>> Bit wordy. "Spellchecker command" ?
>> I'd like to get the idea of "executable" in there somehow. The
>> offending widget is permanently disabled in the Windows port
>> because we force these users to use the [ap]spell library.
> Harumph. The Windows port shouldn't even hav
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:21:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> | Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by
>> | default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught.
>>
>> turn off all debuging if try
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>> But there are two levels of this debug support, normal and pedantic
>>> and we turn on both. I am not sure about what we loose by only using
>>> one of them. That might be a solution.
>>
| | Ah. Can you investigate?
>
| I can ... if the gcc gocs
Having just upgraded to Mac OSX 10.4, I'm having troubles compiling
lyx-13x.
Previously, attempts to compile lyx-13x with gcc-3.3 have failed on
the Mac. (I'll detail these problems with gcc-3.3 in a separate
message.) So I've been using gcc-2.95. However, Apple is no longer
officially su
I'm trying to compile lyx-13x with gcc-3.3 on Mac OSX 10.4 (since
gcc-2.95 doesn't seem to work anymore -- see other thread). The
problem I'm having now is the same problem I've had before but which
we gave up on since gcc-2.95 had been working well.
Any thoughts on how to fix this (or whet
39 matches
Mail list logo
