John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 05:21:53PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> | Hmmph. It's hard to gauge where LyX is wrt performance if this is on by >> | default - daily use of the latest LyX is how much stuff gets caught. >> >> turn off all debuging if trying to gauge whre LyX is wrt performance. >> As with anything else that has debug support turned on by default. > | It's impossible to achieve both testing of performance and debugging | then. I can't run two LyXes at once you know. You've chosen debugging | when we're not in a heavy surgery phase, bit in a tweaks and fixes | stage. Doesn't make much sense to me...
If you don't want stdlib-debug, turn it off. you can still have the mighty -g. --disable-stdlib-debug --enable-debug [...] >> But there are two levels of this debug support, normal and pedantic >> and we turn on both. I am not sure about what we loose by only using >> one of them. That might be a solution. > | Ah. Can you investigate? I can ... if the gcc gocs say something on the matter. -- Lgb