On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:22:03AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> PD: [and talking about 1.4+] How far is the code from having a document
> iterator, that gives a char at a time?
It's doable, and I'd guess we'll have a stab at it in the 1.4 cycle.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Free
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 03:37:26PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> $VISUAL is supposed to be the name of a $EDITOR that doesn't require a
> terminal. Save some pain and just use $VISUAL instead of $EDITOR to
> invoke your editor.
Ah. I did not know that. Maybe because I rarely use editors that don't ne
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
Juergen> 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
Juergen> supported by LyX, are we serious about that?
Probably not. Try it.
On Thursday 12 December 2002 16:32, John Levon wrote:
>
> It should have list-specific behaviour, if it's any good...
for kmail reply to list is *L* (*l* works also). I'm using it in conjunction
with mutt and both work.
> regards
> john
--
José Abílio
John Levon wrote:
> > Currently, I don't have the time for doing a patch.
> maybe someone else can
I did.
Jürgen.
Index: src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >>"Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Juergen> I installed automake 1.6 and had to upgrade also to autoconf
| > Juergen> 2.56, now autogen.sh tells me that autoconf 2.56 is not
| > Juergen> support
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
there.
Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
automake 1.6. Do you know more than me about that?
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
Angus> currently affect LyX. I really think that rolling out an xforms
Angus> tree is a good idea. Once we've proved they work, it'll be easy
Angus> to get them rolled in
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Then allow 2.56 too in the autogen script.
| > It is nice that we allow only autoconf version that we know work
| > there.
|
| Well yes the problem is that I don't know if autconf 2.56 does need
| automake 1.6. Do you know
On Friday 13 December 2002 9:29 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Thursday 12 December 2002 9:50 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > | Incidentally, I have patches for many of the xforms bugs that
> | >
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file "tableerror.lyx";
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th cell/row (with the keyboard)
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
Angus> "interested but no time for active development". That means
Angus> also that anyone interested i
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
> Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as
> Angus> "interested but no tim
Michael Schmitt wrote:
Hello,
I think I have finally found a tabular bug that is easily reproducible
and - hopefully - easy to debug. (And I hope all known tabular problems
are related to each other. )
- Open file "tableerror.lyx";
- for i = 1 to 25:
- move cursor down to the i-th cell/row
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
> xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
> The former because it's really old and doesn't have image support. The
> latter becau
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 13 December 2002 11:01 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the
>> Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can
Angus Leeming wrote:
Agreed. Lars is suggesting setting up an entirely separate tree. I anticipate
having #ifdefs in LyX's xforms frontend for the foreseeable future.
Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of xforms
to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:28 am, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Other than that I have still 0.88 installed and compile with
> it ;) as surely have other people too. I would like to release 1.3.0 which
> still suports all version but announce that the next version will support
> only 1.0 version of xfo
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
Angus> out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former because it's really old and
Angus> doesn't have image support.
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
--
Lgb
On Friday 13 December 2002 11:23 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:24:45AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what version of
> > xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw out both 0.88 and 0.89.
> > The former because i
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:13:00PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How much of the cruft would remain if we settle at 0.89.5 as minimum?
>
> 1 #ifdef block only and 1 piece of combox.C that should have a #if
> FL_VERSION < 1 but doesn't. I'll strip all but this block out and we can
> make a decisi
On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS:
> > $ grep -n "#if" *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
>
> Too much sed lately?
Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] | grep 'FL_'
Perhaps becuase I was trying to do it as a single command for matc
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Friday 13 December 2002 12:06 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> PS: > $ grep -n "#if" *.[Ch] | sed -n '/FL_/p'
>>
>> Too much sed lately?
Angus> Perhaps not enough grep. I dunno why I dodn't use this:
Angus> grep -n '#if' *.[Ch] | g
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
| Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.3? I'd prefer to throw
| Angus> out both 0.88 and 0.89. The former becau
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on
Lars> what | Angus> version of xforms to suppo
On Friday 13 December 2002 2:44 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> |
> | Angus> Having said that, did we come to a consensual view on what
> | Angus> version of xforms to support in LyX 1.
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> (what are the differences between 0.89.5 and 0.89.6?)
Jean-Marc> I think that 0.89.6 is a bug fix over 0.89.6 only.
Hmmpf. Make that ``I think that 0.89.6 is only a bug fix over 0.89.5.''
Actually, the file lib/Change s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Freitag, 13. Dezember 2002 14:15, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Could you please tell me whether you can reproduce the problem with this
> description?
I have tried, but cannot reproduce. (xforms = 1.0).
Sorry.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 12 December 2002 8:10 pm, Garst R. Reese wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I'm going to cc the lyx-devel list with this. If I can find anyone
> > willing to test this stuff out, I'll be very happy indeed.
>
> Hi Angus,
> I'd be happy to test x86, linux. If you have specific tests you wa
Pretty trivial, but posted anyway.
Ok to apply Lars?
--
Angus
ifdef.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
| version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other old
| programs.
For compiling them, or running them?
For compiling them.
On Friday 13 December 2002 3:33 pm, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > | only 1.0 version of xforms (then I will have the time to use only qt
> > | version of LyX as I need 0.88 version of xforms still for some other
> > | old program
I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux? We also need
rpms for xforms 1.0final.
I also did not manage
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I am going to commit soon my last changes to 1.2.2. I will not tag the
| release right now, since I do not have time to check properly that
| everything is OK. I'll do it o monday.
|
| Kayvan, could you please begin to prepare rpms for linux? We
A little further info: I ran lyx1.3 remotely through win2k/ssh/x-win32,
the font is correct.
--
Bo Peng
John Levon wrote:
> should be fixed now
Strange, it does not work correctly here.
If there are any suggestions in the browser, the first item is inserted into
the replacement combo; if no suggestion exist, the replacement from the last
word ist kept.
I do not find the mistake though.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I do not find the mistake though.
Of course not. I should have rebuilt after cvs up.
Sorry,
Jürgen
Some peopel have a hard time figuring out their sub address because
they do not know how to view the full headers under their mailers.
So I'd like somebody to put either a URL or the actual info on the
lyx.org webpage.
I was thinking that I will make a copy of
http://spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/1
39 matches
Mail list logo
