>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> You saw my posting to the xforms list in which I asked how the Angus> future would pan out. I think that it can be summarised as Angus> "interested but no time for active development". That means Angus> also that anyone interested in fixing the bugs in the xforms Angus> source should make absolutely sure that those fixes don't Angus> actually break things. What I meant is that alternative trees like what happens for linux kernels could be OK, but only as long as there is a strong commitment to contribute back to xforms as soon as possible. In particular, I do not think that we should include xforms in the lyx cvs tree and force everyone to use that, but rather make sure that LyX also works with 'plain' xforms. JMarc
