Re: test-export errors

2025-03-18 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:32:09PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Montag, dem 17.03.2025 um 17:53 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > I reported this here: > > https://github.com/latex3/xcolor/issues/42 > > Turned out it was my fault. Fixed. Thanks, I confirm the relevant tests look good

Re: test-export errors

2025-03-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Montag, dem 17.03.2025 um 17:53 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I reported this here: > https://github.com/latex3/xcolor/issues/42 Turned out it was my fault. Fixed. -- Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.l

Re: test-export errors

2025-03-17 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 16.03.2025 um 22:11 +0100 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 03:49:25PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > > I see these errors (with TL25): > > export/doc/EmbeddedObjects_pdf > > export/doc/de/EmbeddedObjects_pdf > > These also fail for me on TL25. Seems to be a bug wit

Re: test-export errors

2025-03-17 Thread Scott Kostyshak
logfile. Everything is OK, therefore the inverted > test does > not pass. > The only thing not OK is missing lyx-converter lilypond-book->latex. > But this did not produce an error. > OTOH, after installing lilypond, the test passes, because running lilypond > produces > er

Re: test-export errors

2025-03-17 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 16 Mar 2025 22:11:41 +0100 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > INVERTED.DOCBOOK_export/examples/ja/Modules/LilyPond_Book_docbook5 > > Passes here. Hm, this is the tail of my logfile. Everything is OK, therefore the inverted test does not pass. The only thing not OK is missing l

Re: test-export errors

2025-03-16 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 03:49:25PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > I see these errors (with TL25): > export/doc/EmbeddedObjects_pdf > export/doc/de/EmbeddedObjects_pdf These also fail for me on TL25. > export/examples/Articles/Springer_Nature_Journals_docbook5 Also fails here, but I don't know if I

test-export errors

2025-03-16 Thread Kornel Benko
I see these errors (with TL25): export/doc/EmbeddedObjects_pdf export/doc/de/EmbeddedObjects_pdf export/examples/Articles/Springer_Nature_Journals_docbook5 INVERTED.DOCBOOK_export/examples/Modules/LilyPond_Book_docbook5 export/examples/Modules/Noweb_dvi3_texF export/examples/Modules/Noweb_dvi3_syst

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: invert a failing xhtml test

2024-07-15 Thread Scott Kostyshak
styshak : > > > > > > > commit 4d15427935b7c965af0aff748ffa2549856c232c > > > > Author: Scott Kostyshak > > > > Date: Sun Jul 14 00:16:19 2024 -0400 > > > > > > > > ctests: invert a failing xhtml test > > > >

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: invert a failing xhtml test

2024-07-15 Thread Kornel Benko
gt; Author: Scott Kostyshak > > > Date: Sun Jul 14 00:16:19 2024 -0400 > > > > > > ctests: invert a failing xhtml test > > > > > > Explanation from Jürgen: > > > > > > the author-specific keys now can have a tra

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: invert a failing xhtml test

2024-07-14 Thread Scott Kostyshak
> ctests: invert a failing xhtml test > > > > Explanation from Jürgen: > > > > the author-specific keys now can have a trailing & > > (after the key as in "abbrvciteauthor&" or at the start of the type > > subtag,

Re: [LyX/master] ctests: invert a failing xhtml test

2024-07-14 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 14 Jul 2024 04:27:30 + schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > commit 4d15427935b7c965af0aff748ffa2549856c232c > Author: Scott Kostyshak > Date: Sun Jul 14 00:16:19 2024 -0400 > > ctests: invert a failing xhtml test > > Explanation from Jürgen: > &

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 01:59:50PM GMT, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 5 May 2024 13:12:48 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > > > See: https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2024-May/050511.html > > > > > > > > Udi > > > > > > Thanks, Kornel and Udi. Indeed, after a new tlmgr update th

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-06 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 5 May 2024 13:12:48 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > See: https://tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2024-May/050511.html > > > > > > Udi > > > > Thanks, Kornel and Udi. Indeed, after a new tlmgr update these tests > > pass. Now the following tests fail for me: > > > > export/exa

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-05 Thread Kornel Benko
> export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf4_systemF (Failed) > > > > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf5_systemF (Failed) > > > > > > > > I attach the file that corresponds to the pdf4_systemF test for > > > > convenience. > >

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Scott Kostyshak
n-ja_platex_pdf5_systemF (Failed) > > > > > > I attach the file that corresponds to the pdf4_systemF test for > > > convenience. > > > > > > The LaTeX error I now get is the following: > > > > > > ! Illegal parameter number in definition of \l__e

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Udicoudco
> export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_dvi3_systemF (Failed) > > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf4_systemF (Failed) > > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf5_systemF (Failed) > > > > I attach the file that corresponds to the pdf4_systemF test for >

Re: Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-04 Thread Kornel Benko
latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf4_systemF (Failed) > export/export/latex/languages/en-ja_platex_pdf5_systemF (Failed) > > I attach the file that corresponds to the pdf4_systemF test for > convenience. > > The LaTeX error I now get is the following: > > ! Illegal parameter number in d

Test failure after tlmgr update (not a LyX issue)

2024-05-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
-ja_platex_pdf5_systemF (Failed) I attach the file that corresponds to the pdf4_systemF test for convenience. The LaTeX error I now get is the following: ! Illegal parameter number in definition of \l__exp_internal_tl. I'm going to ask a question on tex.se to figure out where to report this potential regre

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:14:07AM GMT, José Matos wrote: > On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 23:03 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Thanks, that is a good idea, but I would not want to use that setting > > for most of my documents. I find that doing repeated lyx2lyx does not > > create a smooth workflow. > >

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-08 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 23:03 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Thanks, that is a good idea, but I would not want to use that setting > for most of my documents. I find that doing repeated lyx2lyx does not > create a smooth workflow. > > Scott I pushed against the guarantee before. :-) The rationale

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 03:13:44PM GMT, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 4/7/24 12:46, José Matos wrote: > > On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). > > > > > > Scott > > A possible mid-term solution, to your use c

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 4/7/24 12:46, José Matos wrote: On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). Scott A possible mid-term solution, to your use case, is to set the output format of the latest stable version. This would mean that any docu

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread José Matos
On Sun, 2024-04-07 at 11:31 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Fair enough. That was what I was afraid of (and expected). > > Scott A possible mid-term solution, to your use case, is to set the output format of the latest stable version. This would mean that any document is always imported to the l

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-07 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 06:32:47AM GMT, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 16:51 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I imagine others face the same situation? Is there anything that can > > be done? > > No, I think this will be a nightmare to maintain. And then, you really >

Re: File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-06 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, dem 06.04.2024 um 16:51 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > I imagine others face the same situation? Is there anything that can > be done? No, I think this will be a nightmare to maintain. And then, you really do not "text master" if you strip the most interesting commits. -- Jürgen

File format increases on master make it hard to test

2024-04-06 Thread Scott Kostyshak
I've been enjoying testing master, but on the first file format increment, I'll stop a lot of my testing since they're documents I will want to work on with other people. I have a few documents that only I use and for that I'll try to continue to test master. I imagine

Re: Fwd: DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
> > > Thank you so much, Thibaut. > > > > > > > > Could you send the patch to lyx-devel, so Scott can test it? I am too > > > > unsure about all things docbook to judge. > > > > > > > > > > I tried sending it to the mailing list, but my email

Re: Fwd: DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-26 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 16:00, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 10:46, wrote: > > > > > Thank you so much, Thibaut. > > > > > > Could you send the patch to lyx-devel, s

Re: Fwd: DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 03:07:12PM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 10:46, wrote: > > > Thank you so much, Thibaut. > > > > Could you send the patch to lyx-devel, so Scott can test it? I am too > > unsure about all things docbook to judge.

Re: DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 25.02.2024 um 07:23 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I suppose DocBook does not know how to handle booksubtitle and > journalsubtitle (both standard biblatex fields). The other field, > subtitle, seems to be covered already. > > Thibaut? While you are at it, could you please al

Re: DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-24 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, dem 24.02.2024 um 19:53 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > The following test now fails for me on current master: > >   export/export/docbook/basic_docbook5 > > It does not necessarily mean there's a regression. From what I > understand, DocBook support is fragil

DocBook test now failing on master

2024-02-24 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The following test now fails for me on current master: export/export/docbook/basic_docbook5 It does not necessarily mean there's a regression. From what I understand, DocBook support is fragile for some things so it may be that our DocBook export mechanism needs to adapt to a new feature

test

2022-11-29 Thread fiona
Dear  manager, Good day. This is Fiona from Hebei Juying Hoisting Machinery Co.,Ltd.    Our factory mainly produces chain hoist,  electric hoist , lifting belt,load chain,hand pallet truck & various lifting equipment. And we have rich export experience  for more than 10 years.   If any r

Re: Test

2022-06-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
I received your test, and it was signed. By the way, that's cool you can add an alias, i.e., I see: gpg: Good signature from "Kornel Benko " [full] gpg: aka "Kornel Benko " [full] I did not know you could do that. That's helpful to know. Note that

Test

2022-06-23 Thread Kornel Benko
pgp4Sqj8KCzM2.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: A docbook test is failing on current master

2022-04-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Apr 03, 2022 at 03:41:43AM +0200, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 20:24, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > The following test fails for me on current master: > > > > export/export/xhtml/table_borders_docbook5 > > > > Thanks for the n

Re: A docbook test is failing on current master

2022-04-02 Thread Thibaut Cuvelier
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022 at 20:24, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The following test fails for me on current master: > > export/export/xhtml/table_borders_docbook5 > Thanks for the notice! It's been fixed as e7ed8213ac. -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://list

A docbook test is failing on current master

2022-04-02 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The following test fails for me on current master: export/export/xhtml/table_borders_docbook5 Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: [LyX/master] Cmake build: Fix the invalid test for '-Wno-deprecated-copy' flag

2021-09-29 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wed, 29 Sep 2021 18:16:44 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 29/09/2021 à 17:32, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > commit c26db650a1e93573e4c09d4612ad45ae1e219854 > > Author: Kornel Benko > > Date: Wed Sep 29 17:53:50 2021 +0200 > > > > Cmake buil

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-15 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:32:57PM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU > General Public License, version 2 or any later version. Thanks, I added you to credits. Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-15 Thread Pavel Sanda
ave '-DLYX_ENABLE_URLTESTS:BOOL=ON'. We should > >>>>> move the > >>>>> find_package() call to different place, maybe to the main > >>>>> CMakeLists.txt. > >>>>> > >>>>> Kornel > >>>> Hm, done at 568

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-14 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
ferent place, maybe to the main CMakeLists.txt. >>>>> >>>>> Kornel >>>> Hm, done at 5680a4d3. >>> Thanks, that fixed it! >>> >>> Updated patchset attached. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sam. >> Thanks, test wo

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
gt; CMakeLists.txt. > > > > > > > > Kornel > > > > > > Hm, done at 5680a4d3. > > > > Thanks, that fixed it! > > > > Updated patchset attached. > > > > Thanks, > > Sam. > > Thanks, test works. > From my

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Kornel Benko
you do not have '-DLYX_ENABLE_URLTESTS:BOOL=ON'. We should > > > move the > > > find_package() call to different place, maybe to the main CMakeLists.txt. > > > > > > Kornel > > > > Hm, done at 5680a4d3. > > Thanks, that fixed it!

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:42:29 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:55:48 +1300 > schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, at 00:12, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Running the test I get: > > > ... > > > Can't exec

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 13 Nov 2020 23:42:29 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:55:48 +1300 > schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > > > On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, at 00:12, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Running the test I get: > > > ... > > > Can't exec

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 14 Nov 2020 10:55:48 +1300 schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, at 00:12, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Running the test I get: > > ... > > Can't exec > > "/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/development/batchtests/bin/compare_custom.pl&quo

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Sam Crawley
On Sat, 14 Nov 2020, at 00:12, Kornel Benko wrote: > Running the test I get: > ... > Can't exec > "/usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/development/batchtests/bin/compare_custom.pl": > Permission denied at > /BUILD/BUILDMint18/BuildLyxGitQt5.9.5local-gcc8.4.0/lyx_batch.pl &g

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-13 Thread Kornel Benko
the command line. The > tests now > use this. A couple of other things tidied up too. > > Thanks, > Sam. > > On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, at 17:14, Sam Crawley wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've created a fairly basic test suite for the Compare function. It us

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-12 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 08:57:42PM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > In that case, I'll add a different parameter to the LFUN to differentiate > between case (ii) and (iii). So instead of passing "run" (and the two file > names), you will pass "run-sync" to indicate that you want it to block for > the

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-11 Thread Sam Crawley
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, at 00:18, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:10:09PM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > > > > I'm not sure I understand. When cmd_mode == true (which is always the case > > when run() is invoked via the LFUN), > > Maybe I do not understand your intentions then. I thoug

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 09:10:09PM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > > 2) It seems that if (!cmd_mode) you will call finished(false) twice > > thus wrongly > >reverting the toggles from FuncRequest(LFUN_CHANGES_OUTPUT) in > > finished(), right? > > I'm not sure I understand. When cmd_mode == true

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-11 Thread Sam Crawley
On Wed, 11 Nov 2020, at 00:31, Pavel Sanda wrote: > So I looked at the code for the command line run at this place looks > good enough. Thanks for having a look. > I have another concerns though: > 1) slotOK contains error() call which seems to be missed now. If you > don't want it for >com

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-10 Thread Sam Crawley
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or any later version. Sam Crawley. On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, at 23:39, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:32:59 +0100 > schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 05:14:42PM

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:03:47AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > @@ -343,7 +348,12 @@ bool GuiCompare::initialiseParams(std::string > > > > const &par) > > > > if (cmd.getArg(0) == "run") { > > > > oldFileCB->setEditText(toqstr(cmd.getArg(1))); > > > > n

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-10 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 8 Nov 2020 11:32:59 +0100 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 05:14:42PM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Sam, > > welcome and thanks for working on this. Couple small things: > > - Please send in a separate email to our list the following GPL statement: > > I

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 09:19:42AM +1300, Sam Crawley wrote: > On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, at 23:32, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Git commit messages tend to have the following structure: first summary > > line, > > empty line and then the details. This helps with log summaries. > > That is the format I use

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:07:35 +1300 schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, at 01:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Needed new perl module (Slurp.pm), got from package 'libfile-slurp-perl'. > > I think this use to be in Perl core, but it's now been taken out. I can > easily rewrite > if the depen

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Mon, 09 Nov 2020 09:00:48 +1300 schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, at 22:28, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:14:42 +1300 > > schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > > ... > > > diff --git a/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in b/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > > > index 2d93d27c59..32ef0f974a

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Sam Crawley
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, at 23:32, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Git commit messages tend to have the following structure: first summary line, > empty line and then the details. This helps with log summaries. That is the format I used, unless I'm missing something. The 'subject' line in a git patch file is th

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Sam Crawley
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020, at 22:28, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:14:42 +1300 > schrieb "Sam Crawley" : > ... > > diff --git a/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in b/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > > index 2d93d27c59..32ef0f974a 100644 > > --- a/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > > +++ b/lib/scripts/lyx_b

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Sam Crawley
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, at 01:01, Kornel Benko wrote: > Needed new perl module (Slurp.pm), got from package 'libfile-slurp-perl'. I think this use to be in Perl core, but it's now been taken out. I can easily rewrite if the dependency is a problem.-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org ht

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 12:48:11PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 11/8/20 12:12 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 11:32:59AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Scott/Kornel will presumably review/check the testing part. > > I don't have much time to review or help, althou

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 11/8/20 12:12 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 11:32:59AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott/Kornel will presumably review/check the testing part. > I don't have much time to review or help, although I would be happy to take a > look in the future (possibly not for a while t

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 11:32:59AM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott/Kornel will presumably review/check the testing part. I don't have much time to review or help, although I would be happy to take a look in the future (possibly not for a while though). Thanks to Pavel and Kornel for giving

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Kornel Benko
> > > > -sub checkPrecondition(); > > > -sub system1(@); > > > -sub addFiles($$$); > > > -sub mycompare($$$); > > > - > > > > Hm, why are you removing the prototypes? > > > > Kornel > > Applies clean. > Nee

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Kornel Benko
; > - > > Hm, why are you removing the prototypes? > > Kornel Applies clean. Needed new perl module (Slurp.pm), got from package 'libfile-slurp-perl'. Test passes after 17 seconds. All other batch tests are still OK. Nice work. (The testfiles old.lyx/new.lyx a

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Pavel Sanda
ime, can't we just wait until it finishes? > From 9cdd8e876e812b6dd194df1f586a369fb5bcb3d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Sam Crawley > Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2020 20:57:14 +1300 > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Created initial test for compare function > > Runs the compare via a

Re: [Patch] Test suite for compare function

2020-11-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 08 Nov 2020 17:14:42 +1300 schrieb "Sam Crawley" : ... > diff --git a/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in b/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > index 2d93d27c59..32ef0f974a 100644 > --- a/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > +++ b/lib/scripts/lyx_batch.pl.in > @@ -8,11 +8,6 @@ use warnings; > use File::Copy; >

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 05:32:18AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2020, 12:40 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:02:36AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > The following test fails for me: > > > > >

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2020, 12:40 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:02:36AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > The following test fails for me: > > > > > export/templates/Articles/American_Psychological_Association_%28APA%2 > 9,_v._7

Re: Test Email

2020-08-26 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
On 8/26/20 7:27 PM, Doug Martin wrote: > I just got subscribed to this list, thanks to the kind help of Riki Heck. > And I just wanted to check that indeed I can send an email to the list. And it seems to have come through. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.ly

Test Email

2020-08-26 Thread Doug Martin
I just got subscribed to this list, thanks to the kind help of Riki Heck. And I just wanted to check that indeed I can send an email to the list. Doug -- R. Douglas Martin Professor Emeritus in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Founder and Former Director of MS-CFRM Program depts.washington.ed

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-26 Thread Scott Kostyshak
tandably) > > do not take into account the ERT. Unless anyone wants to take a closer > > look, I plan to invert the test (i.e., mark in the ctests that we expect > > this test to fail), especially since it is regarding 2.2.x and not even > > 2.3.x. > > > > Scott &g

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-26 Thread José Abílio Matos
> look, I plan to invert the test (i.e., mark in the ctests that we expect > this test to fail), especially since it is regarding 2.2.x and not even > 2.3.x. > > Scott You are right, as soon as ERT enters the backport the roundtrip test becomes doomed. Yes, it can work but and y

Re: lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:02:36AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > The following test fails for me: > > > export/templates/Articles/American_Psychological_Association_%28APA%29,_v._7_lyx22 > (Failed) > > To reproduce: > > lyx -e lyx22x American_Psychological_

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 01:44:33AM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:36:52 -0400 > schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 01:35:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:53:25 +0200 > > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > > > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2

lyx2lyx roundtrip test failing with BibTeX errors

2020-08-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
The following test fails for me: export/templates/Articles/American_Psychological_Association_%28APA%29,_v._7_lyx22 (Failed) To reproduce: lyx -e lyx22x American_Psychological_Association_%28APA%29,_v._7.lyx && lyx -e pdf2 American_Psychological_Association_%28APA%29,_v._7.22.lyx

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 14:36:52 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 01:35:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:53:25 +0200 > > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > > > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:09:24 +0200 > > > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > > > > > Am Sams

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 01:35:54PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:53:25 +0200 > schrieb Kornel Benko : > > > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:09:24 +0200 > > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > > > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > OK. In the mean t

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:53:25 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:09:24 +0200 > schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > > > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > OK. In the mean time, (I don't expect a solution in the near future) > > > we should use your p

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sun, 23 Aug 2020 10:09:24 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > OK. In the mean time, (I don't expect a solution in the near future) > > we should use your patch. Just my 2c. > > I went for alphabetic ordering now. > > Jürgen

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-23 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:34 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > OK. In the mean time, (I don't expect a solution in the near future) > we should use your patch. Just my 2c. I went for alphabetic ordering now. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-deve

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 22 Aug 2020 14:25:53 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > The other thing is the unspecified sequence of documentclass options. > > We have to expect different outcome depending on the phase of moon. > > The order really

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 14:04 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > The other thing is the unspecified sequence of documentclass options. > We have to expect different outcome depending on the phase of moon. The order really should not matter. And as you demonstrated, the sequence also differs for pre

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:39:28 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Looks good. The endless loop is gone :) > > Thanks. I first try to get it fixed upstream. If this doesn't work, we > can still commit this ugly workaround. > > Jü

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 11:39 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Looks good. The endless loop is gone :) Thanks. I first try to get it fixed upstream. If this doesn't work, we can still commit this ugly workaround. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Sat, 22 Aug 2020 11:18:58 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 10:28 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > What we can do is to assure that hebrew is always output after arabic > > and farsi. But this of course only works if Arabic or Farsi are not > > the main langu

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 10:28 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > What we can do is to assure that hebrew is always output after arabic > and farsi. But this of course only works if Arabic or Farsi are not > the main language. This would be something like the attached. Kornel, Scott, does this

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, den 22.08.2020, 10:28 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > My guess is that arabicore.sty (use by Farsi and Arabic) and > lhbabel.def (used by Hebrew) redefine \everypar in incompatible ways. > > What we can do is to assure that hebrew is always output after arabic > and farsi. But this

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2020, 19:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > This version does hang. Switch the commented documentclass, and now > the compilation does not hang. It boils down to the order of hebrew and farsi (or arabic): \documentclass[ hebrew,% breaks farsi,% or: arabic

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2020, 13:33 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > Thanks to you two for looking into this annoying problem. I don't > have > much time to contribute or test. > > The following ML thread is relevant. I'm not sure it contains any > additional information

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
> > > > Thanks to you two for looking into this annoying problem. I don't have > > much time to contribute or test. > > > > The following ML thread is relevant. I'm not sure it contains any > > additional information but I put it nonetheless a

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 21 Aug 2020 13:33:58 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak : > > > Thanks. Could you send also the other file, for comparison? > > > > It is too edited (the documentclass line) > > Thanks to you two for looking into this annoying problem. I don't have &

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Scott Kostyshak
t; > Yes. > > > > > > > If not, could you send the problematic tex file? > > > > > > Attached. > > > > Thanks. Could you send also the other file, for comparison? > > It is too edited (the documentclass line) Thanks to you two for looking into

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Kornel Benko
\textcopyright}}\else\textcopyright\fi} \addto\noextraslithuanian{\latintext} \addto\extrasestonian{\bbl@deactivate{~}} \DeclareTextSymbol{\guillemotright}{LFE}{62} \DeclareTextSymbol{\guillemotleft}{LFE}{60} % arabic + hyperref redefines \noboundary as local textcommand \let\orig@noboundary\

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2020, 19:06 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Are these the only differences in the tex file? > > No, but others are only the sequence of defining some latex commands. But this should also not differ. > > > And does the first tex file also hang if you run pdflatex directly?

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Kornel Benko
wa\bbl@allowhyphens} \DeclareTextCommand{\textSchwa}{T1}{\CYRSCHWA\bbl@allowhyphens} % fix albanian: restore \th as LATIN LETTER THORN \@ifl@aded{def}{t1enc}{\DeclareTextSymbol{\th}{T1}{254}}{} % arabic + hyperref redefines \noboundary as local textcommand \let\orig@noboundary\noboundary \DeclareT

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2020, 18:18 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > $ egrep cache Testing/.lyx/preferences > \converter_cache_maxage 15552000 > \use_converter_cache false > > But I suspect now differences in the used tex-files. > The main difference (as I see it) is the definition of

Re: Test entering an endless loop in latex processing

2020-08-21 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Fri, 21 Aug 2020 17:48:47 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Kornel Benko schrieb am Fr., 21. Aug. 2020, 17:13: > > > Sure? > > > > Sure. The execution time of pdflatex is constantly increasing. > > I meant: sure cache is disabled? > > > Mark, that this is only a single export (no oth

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >