On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:14:49PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Tuesday, 25 August 2020 17.40.51 WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I'm guessing this happens because we export ERT/preamble stuff in the > > backwards conversion, and in the forwards conversion we (understandably) > > do not take into account the ERT. Unless anyone wants to take a closer > > look, I plan to invert the test (i.e., mark in the ctests that we expect > > this test to fail), especially since it is regarding 2.2.x and not even > > 2.3.x. > > > > Scott > > You are right, as soon as ERT enters the backport the roundtrip test becomes > doomed. Yes, it can work but and yes sometimes we could improve the ERT > (probably in convoluted ways) to simplify a later forward conversion but it > is > not worth the cost-benefit of such work. > > IMHO, of course. :-)
Thanks for taking a look, José. That sounds good. I added a sublabel for the inverted ctests (at c44cfec3) to track cases that fall under this category. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
