Re: [LyX/2.3.2-staging] Oops, asInsetGrpahics is new to master.

2018-02-16 Thread Richard Heck
On 02/15/2018 03:48 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit 25741ca5bd2ff4c7eb55de0fabfa41bbf476c77e > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Thu Feb 15 21:48:23 2018 +0100 > > Oops, asInsetGrpahics is new to master. It would be fine to copy that into 2.3.2-staging. Richard

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-20 Thread Pavel Sanda
Christian Ridderström wrote: > There's an FTP on the LyX server... I sent out details earlier today. > So perhaps 'sshfs' is an option for uploading things. Maybe we could have separate account just for manuals and possibility to directly link to that folder from web/wiki. That way Tommaso can dir

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-20 Thread Christian Ridderström
Pavel Sanda writes: > The way I can comfortably push this tree onto web server will make > it pages of it's own so pmwiki format is of no help. > > If you want to make part of wiki the only reasonable way I see is > to cooperate with Christian to create some sort of ftp/scp uploading > tunnel. I

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-17 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 18/08/2017 02:09, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: no more time for today... but perhaps the cache wipe-out work-around is already good enough. pushed, seems acceptable (except for 0_tmp_tmp_*, 1_tmp_tmp_*, etc...) T.

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-17 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
On 17/08/2017 21:49, Pavel Sanda wrote: To recap the current problems from my POV: 1. en/ should have it's own directory as a normal language because xhtml output target produces lot of images which clutter root dir (please use xhtml, not html). sure, easy. 2. exported icons still con

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-17 Thread Pavel Sanda
Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > Thx Pavel for pushing this. I'd like to add to the script the capability to > generate the index in PmWiki format, so that its output can be > copy'n'pasted straight to At this moment I do not consider the script at production stage so feel free to develop it in any wa

Re: [LyX/master] oops, git is playing games with me.

2017-08-17 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
avel Sanda wrote: commit e8b324a984e6cbbeb4ea02ba553bd5da520eb3f8 Author: Pavel Sanda Date: Thu Aug 17 01:24:44 2017 +0200 oops, git is playing games with me. --- development/tools/generate_manuals_for_web.sh |3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/development/tools/ge

Re: Oops... (Re: [Cvslog] r13617 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/math_nestinset.C)

2006-04-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 13:55 +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > ...wrong tree, wrong patch (right log entry :-( ) > > I'll try and revert this. Done. Sorry for the noise (using esvn for the first time to commit, and not concentrating) - Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sign

Re: Oops... (Re: [Cvslog] r13617 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/math_nestinset.C)

2006-04-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ...wrong tree, wrong patch (right log entry :-( ) | | I'll try and revert this. | | - Martin | | On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 10:48 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | > Author: vermeer | > Date: Mon Apr 10 12:47:59 2006 | > New Revision: 13617 Reverting is

Oops... (Re: [Cvslog] r13617 - /lyx-devel/trunk/src/mathed/math_nestinset.C)

2006-04-10 Thread Martin Vermeer
...wrong tree, wrong patch (right log entry :-( ) I'll try and revert this. - Martin On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 10:48 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: vermeer > Date: Mon Apr 10 12:47:59 2006 > New Revision: 13617 > > Log: > Fix bug 2485 and crash on middle-mouse paste into math. >

oops [Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor?

2000-09-16 Thread hawk
ack, wrong list . . . --

Re: Oops - missing de_TOC.lyx

2000-05-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Peter" == Peter Suetterlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Peter> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> BTW, Amir, hasn't there been some discussions about creating >> automatically the xx_TOC.lyx files? Peter> you mean on-the-fly? A perl script to do it is there, that's Peter> what I used (in a sli

Re: Oops - missing de_TOC.lyx

2000-05-30 Thread Peter Suetterlin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > BTW, Amir, hasn't there been some discussions about creating > automatically the xx_TOC.lyx files? you mean on-the-fly? A perl script to do it is there, that's what I used (in a slightly changed version)... Pit

Re: Oops! gcc 2.8.x _does_ support std:: namespace

2000-03-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Aaarggghhh!!! (do...redo...reredo...) Somehow I knew you would not like this... Lars> Ok, then I will remove all uses of "using ...;" from the .h Lars> files, I'll leave them in the .C files. That makes sense. In fact, gcc 2

Re: Oops! gcc 2.8.x _does_ support std:: namespace

2000-03-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, | | Sorry about what I wrote a few days ago: gcc 2.8.x happily compiles | stuff like std::vector (and simply ignores them). It was gcc 2.7.x | which did not. Aaarggghhh!!! (do...redo...reredo...) Ok, then I will remove all uses of "usin

Oops! gcc 2.8.x _does_ support std:: namespace

2000-03-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Lars, Sorry about what I wrote a few days ago: gcc 2.8.x happily compiles stuff like std::vector (and simply ignores them). It was gcc 2.7.x which did not. So you can do what you want with 'using' directive, since it seems clear that gcc 2.7.x is not going to be supported again... JMarc

Re: oops!

1999-10-01 Thread Ben Cazzolato
Guys > I have been looking into this although I haven't much time to do the > implementation. So far I've found at least twenty different variations of > cite ranging from "cite" to "citeauthor" to "astrocite" and the much > requested "cite[ntp]" etc. Unfortunately, my best plan at present > in

Re: oops!

1999-10-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> The AASTeX package uses natbib.sty for it's citation mechanism Mike> (natbib is a standard part of the teTeX distribution). AASTeX Mike> itself uses only the \citep and \citet commands. A LyX Mike> implementation of an extended citation popup sh

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> > Thus, my serious consideration to be a mercenary and taint the > > pristine waters of Open Source code with filthy lucre ... > > I don't think anyone has ever really said Free software had to be free. > (No, Stallman doesn't oppose paying for software its the not sharing > code and ideas he d

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Allan Rae
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Allan Rae wrote: > > > Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet > > > Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a > > > > I have been looking into this although I haven't much time to d

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread mressler
On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Allan Rae wrote: > > Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet > > Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a > > I have been looking into this although I haven't much time to do the > implementation. So far I've found at least twen

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Allan Rae
On 30 Sep 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mike> I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten. > Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet > Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Ben Cazzolato
> Besides, I > would be much more excited about it if my pet \citet/\citep mechanism were > implemented; I think that is a serious deficiency in LyX for use with > AASTeX, and thus the AASTeX stuff is more of a toy than a real paper > writing tool (sorry guys). I hate telling people "Yeah, LyX i

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mike" == <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mike> I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten. Mike> Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pet Mike> \citet/\citep mechanism were implemented; I think that is a Mike> serious deficiency in LyX for use with AASTeX,

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread mressler
On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > How come aastex isn't mentioned though? Mike might get offended that the > physicists are considered more important than the astro-folk. I submitted AASTeX just after 1.0.3, so it has been forgotten. Besides, I would be much more excited about it if my pe

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Amir Karger
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> We didn't update WHATSNEW! My suggestion: > > When is the last time you ran 'cvs up'? Wow. Amir gets the stupid prize twice in two weeks. How come aastex is

Re: oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> We didn't update WHATSNEW! My suggestion: When is the last time you ran 'cvs up'? JMarc

oops!

1999-09-30 Thread Amir Karger
We didn't update WHATSNEW! My suggestion: What's new in 1.0.4 compared to LyX version 1.0.3? -- LyX 1.0.4 is a minor update to LyX 1.0.3. Besides fixing some bugs compared to version 1.0.3 and enhancing stability, it adds the following features:

oops, here's the attachement

1999-05-14 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
I hit ^C^C in the file selection menu in exmh, and instead of a "huh?", it sent the underlying message . . . resume.ps

Re: OOPS!

1999-03-11 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
> disregard the previous email. Unless you like star wars. It was supposed to > go to stefan, who missed the boat again. The boat, or the shuttle? :) Maybe he went to the dark side. He could even be using Word this very minute . . . rick, whose 7 year old daughter is anxiously awaiting the

OOPS!

1999-03-11 Thread Amir Karger
disregard the previous email. Unless you like star wars. It was supposed to go to stefan, who missed the boat again. -Amir

Re: Tutorial oops

1999-03-02 Thread mressler
Okay - I committed this to lyxdoc (with the patch). Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Tutorial oops

1999-03-02 Thread Amir Karger
OK. Patch for the tutorial. Sorry. -Amir --- zzz Tue Mar 2 14:59:53 1999 +++ Tutorial.lyxTue Mar 2 14:59:26 1999 @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#This file was created by Tue Mar 2 13:46:34 1999 +#This file was created by Tue Mar 2 14:59:26 1999 #LyX 1.0 (C) 1995-1998 Matthias Ettrich and the L

Re: Oops - here's de.po

1999-02-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Thanks. I just did the commit. JMarc

Oops - here's de.po

1999-02-24 Thread Peter Suetterlin
de.po.gz

oops! Here's the devel page

1999-02-02 Thread Amir Karger
Forgot the attachment! Title: LyX - Developers only Navigate · LyX Home page · Developers only · CVS Web · CVS Commit log   Customize · Short titles · Top navigator Developers only Welcome to the LyX developers only web-site. This site is meant to be used primarily by the developer

oops!

1999-01-28 Thread Amir Karger
forgot the file! #This file was created by Tue Jan 26 17:48:36 1999 #LyX 1.0 (C) 1995-1998 Matthias Ettrich and the LyX Team \lyxformat 2.15 \textclass revtex \options aps,manuscript \layout Title Insert your Title Here \layout Author Author1 \begin_float footnote \layout Standard Author t

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-27 Thread John Weiss
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 01:22:51PM -0500, Amir Karger wrote: > I'm a bit wary of sticking this inside Extended Editing. Does it really fit? > And it's kind of big Once the dialog has been perfected, it would make > somewhat more sense I suppose. OTOH, maybe this would belong in the LyX and > L

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread mressler
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Amir Karger wrote: > Again, if we do add this doc, we'll have to mention it in the intro as well > as the UG and tutorial. Is Mike unreachable in Hawaii? I'm actually more reachable than usual right now. After I get our instrument up and running tomorrow, I'll actually have

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> I thought you had an AI that did that even if you didn't come in Amir> to the office. Yes, I have one, and he is a very nice one. From what Altavita tells me, an Aï is what you would call a ``Pale-Throated Three Sloth (Bradypus Tridac

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 07:06:53PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Amir> Nielsen wrote: >> > (1) Call it reLyX, which can be translated as reLyX in all >> (latin-1) > languages. Unless you want to call it réLyX or >> something, to sound fancie

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Amir Karger
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 07:06:53PM +0100, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > > (1) Call it reLyX, which can be translated as reLyX in all (latin-1) > > languages. Unless you want to call it réLyX or something, to sound fancier. > > (In america, accents make words foreign and hence exotic. Perhaps t

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> OK. In that case... HELP! I don't know how to add things to menus and I > don't have lyxdoc access (or maybe I do?) Can a devvie help me out with > this? Adding something to the menu is as simple as editing menus.C appropriately. However, as I just wrote, I think the better option is to embed

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Amir Karger
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 06:59:31PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> #1 is *way* easier, so why don't we do that now. There are other > Amir> things that we need to do this week (I was hoping I could send > Amir> in a reLyX with

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> (1) Call it reLyX, which can be translated as reLyX in all (latin-1) > languages. Unless you want to call it réLyX or something, to sound fancier. > (In america, accents make words foreign and hence exotic. Perhaps the joke > is lost on the few non-American readers of this list.) The joke is Am

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> #1 is *way* easier, so why don't we do that now. There are other Amir> things that we need to do this week (I was hoping I could send Amir> in a reLyX with a semi-large bugfix, fix the revtex Amir> template... and I'm sure others have

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> The only reason I could think of that someone wouldn't want to Amir> put it in is that having too many manuals in the help menu could Amir> be confusing. But it seems to me that if it's called "Importing Amir> LaTeX Documents", it won'

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Amir Karger
On Mon, Jan 25, 1999 at 06:14:19PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> The only reason I could think of that someone wouldn't want to > Amir> put it in is that having too many manuals in the help menu could > Amir> be confusing. B

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-25 Thread Amir Karger
On Wed, Jan 20, 1999 at 07:10:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Amir> Forgot to attach this! -Amir > > So, what shall we do wih it? Setting apart the amazing technical feat, Next I'm going to write a perl script to make lyx do

Re: reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Amir" == Amir Karger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Amir> Forgot to attach this! -Amir So, what shall we do wih it? Setting apart the amazing technical feat, what is the feeling of doc people about whether this should go in docs? JMarc

reLyXdoc (oops)

1999-01-19 Thread Amir Karger
Forgot to attach this! -Amir reLyX.lyx.gz