<SNIP> > Besides, I > would be much more excited about it if my pet \citet/\citep mechanism were > implemented; I think that is a serious deficiency in LyX for use with > AASTeX, and thus the AASTeX stuff is more of a toy than a real paper > writing tool (sorry guys). I hate telling people "Yeah, LyX is great for > writing astronomical manuscripts, but you still have to do citations by > hand because LyX only knows about \cite." If the citation stuff were > "fixed", I would be generating e-mail to the AAS in Washington, DC, and > asking them to officially sanction LyX for use in writing papers. I just > don't feel right about doing this in its current configuration. Yes, yes, yes. I agree totally. I now feel that the only thing that Lyx really lacks is the ability to toggle between citations. The rest is (relatively) incidental. When showing people Lyx they always ask "what is that ERT"? Well, they don't actually say ERT but more like "that looks like latex". I have to concede to them that it is the only way I can get a noun type citation. Ben PS Congrats on releasing 1.0.4 and keep up the good work!!
