> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel> wrote:
>> > "Jos?" == Jos? Ab?lio Oliveira Matos
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> Jos?> As Jean-Marc suggested --with-included-string fixes the Jos?>
>> pr
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 04:59:43PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Jos?" == Jos? Ab?lio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jos?> As Jean-Marc suggested --with-included-string fixes the
> Jos?> problem. How can I compile lyx with another g++? I have version
> Jos?> 3.0.2
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 15:59, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> CC=gcc3 CXX=g++3 ./configure ...
I am now compiling 1.1.4 where CXX is respected but not CC.
> JMarc
I have problems with src/support/DebugStream.C, both with 2.96 and with
3.0.2. I will investigate further...
--
José Abílio
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> As Jean-Marc suggested --with-included-string fixes the
José> problem. How can I compile lyx with another g++? I have version
José> 3.0.2 that is called g++3.
CC=gcc3 CXX=g++3 ./configure ...
JMarc
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 15:26, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> add a const_cast: const_cast(var)
Ok, that fix solves it.
> | lstrings.C:119: Unable to find a register to spill in class `AREG'.
> | lstrings.C:119: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
> |
> | The function in question is:
> |
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 14:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> I guess
>> wc -l `find src/ -name \*.[Cch]`
>> is good enough. We do not want to count libsigc++ or boost as ours. Of
>> course this counts also the gnome/qt2 frontends for
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Status of compilation until now:
José> * The 1.0.x compiled ok, with x=0..4
Good.
José> * I get this errors for (the next in stable series):
José> make[3]: Entering directory
José> `/home/jamatos/lyx/lyx-1.1.2
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 14:47, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> I guess
> wc -l `find src/ -name \*.[Cch]`
> is good enough. We do not want to count libsigc++ or boost as ours. Of
> course this counts also the gnome/qt2 frontends for recent versions,
> but the impact is IMO not very important
> A
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, since you are compiling all these versions, what about doing
>> a nice plot over time of - number of line of code
José> IIRC you have (had?) a script that did these calculations.
I guess
wc -l `find src/ -name \
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 14:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> José> I will revert that code, it easier for me. :-)
>
> The correct fix has been added in 1.0.4. So you will have to do the
> same for 1.0[23] too. It would probably be a good idea to keep
> somewhere the patch you needed to apply.
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> > "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The macros are broken in autoconf 2.13,
>> and recent lyx versions use our own fixed LYX_FUN
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:58, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The macros are broken in autoconf 2.13, and recent lyx versions use
> our own fixed LYX_FUNC_SELECT_ARGTYPES (in lyxinclude.m4). You may
> want to use that, or use the old
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Should I revert this patch? Why does it fails? I was expecting
José> it to be safer with those macros, but here g++ (2.96-110)
José> doesn't complain with 1.0.0.
The macros are broken in autoconf 2.13, and recent lyx
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok... can you try to describe how you plan to do all this, so that we
> can have a small discussion before you begin?
Ok, in a different thread and after the lunch. :-)
> >> _how_ can that be...
> |
> | The time or the fact that i
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:50, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Are you planning to do the conversion with pipes and ch
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 12:18, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:50, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Are you planning to do the conversion with pipes and chaining of
> >> pipes?
> >> I'd prefere that solution.
> |
> |
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Regarding other distributions I know that mandrake 8.2 ships
José> with python 2.2, the previous version of debian probably also
José> did only have 1.5.2 and the new version has 2.1.3.
Mandrake 8.1 has python 2.1.2.
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:50, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Are you planning to do the conversion with pipes and chaining of
>> pipes?
>> I'd prefere that solution.
>
| Not with pipes, but in several stages, each one related with that
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:50, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Are you planning to do the conversion with pipes and chaining of
> pipes?
> I'd prefere that solution.
Not with pipes, but in several stages, each one related with that version.
From one version till the next one and so on.
> To w
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:39, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > writes:
>
> José> Oh yes, but for example the default instalation of python in
> José> rh 7.3 is still 1.5.2, and that applies for all the previous
> José> versions
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:38, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> What version are you planning to start with?
>> (I'd say no earlier than 1.0)
>
| Since those are the ones that are present in ftp.lyx.org in stable I will
| start from ther
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:38, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> What version are you planning to start with?
> (I'd say no earlier than 1.0)
Since those are the ones that are present in ftp.lyx.org in stable I will
start from there. Later if this suceeds we should try earlier versions (but
not
José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> José> I have the time, so I will start to work on this.
>>
>> Excellent news. I began to be worried about the situation.
>>
>> José> What do you think is a good version of
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Oh yes, but for example the default instalation of python in
José> rh 7.3 is still 1.5.2, and that applies for all the previous
José> versions of rh that people are using.
Oh. I'm afraid you have to stick to 1.5.2, t
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> José> I have the time, so I will start to work on this.
>
> Excellent news. I began to be worried about the situation.
>
> José> What do you think is a good version of python to start?
>
> José> 1.5.2 would be a very conservative
> "José" == José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Does this mean that python will be required for future lyx
>> versions? Which version?
>>
>> Also having #!/usr/bin/python in the script is not really an
>>
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 10:46, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Does this mean that python will be required for future lyx versions?
> Which version?
>
> Also having #!/usr/bin/python in the script is not really an option,
> since python may be in /usr/local/bin in many non-linux systems.
> Wouldn'
>>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:31:52PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
>> > 2) I am not sure about where to put it. > I think that the
>> lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/ &g
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 10:05:29PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> It can be run by the user, but what is the point ?
> (though the same can be said on relyx)
for i in `ls lotsoflyxfiles/*.lyx`; do lyxconvert $i; done
?
> It currently doesn't convert everything, but this can be added
cool. A good
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 06:31:52PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > 2) I am not sure about where to put it.
> > I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/
> > (the other option is to keep it in LYXDIR/scripts).
>
> If it's runnable by the user
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 08:17:21PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 1) I am not sure about the name for this script.
I think lyxconvert is just fine ...
> 2) I am not sure about where to put it.
> I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/
> (the other option i
On Monday 22 July 2002 6:17 pm, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> I did not put the lyxconvert script in CVS since
> 1) I am not sure about the name for this script.
> 2) I am not sure about where to put it.
> I think that the lyxconvert script should be installed in /usr/bin/
> (the other optio
/: ChangeLog buffer.C
> lyx-devel/src/support/: ChangeLog filetools.C filetools.h
>
> Log message:
> Use lyxconvert script for reading old files
I did not put the lyxconvert script in CVS since
1) I am not sure about the name for this script.
2) I am not sure about where to pu
33 matches
Mail list logo
