José Abílio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday 23 July 2002 11:00, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>
>> José> I have the time, so I will start to work on this.
>>
>> Excellent news. I began to be worried about the situation.
>>
>> José> What do you think is a good version of python to start?
>>
>> José> 1.5.2 would be a very conservative value, and I really like
>> José> the new features. :-)
>>
>> What about 1.6? The python website says:
>>
>> Python 1.5.2
>>
>> Do yourself a favor and get a more recent version!
>
| Oh yes, but for example the default instalation of python in rh 7.3 is still
| 1.5.2, and that applies for all the previous versions of rh that people are
| using. Actually the reason is interesting, since they consider python a major
| component of their system they only update it in a x.0 release.
>
| I know that lyx is not for linux, not even for rh only, the question is the
| usual regarding the used tools.
>
| Notice that if we write code for 1.5.2, as a least common denominator, it
| will work for all the other versions of python. What I would like to hear is
| what do you (devel readers) think about it.
>
>> José> Time to get all the previous versions of lyx to compile. :-)
>>
>> That will be funny (really?)
>
| I just seat and watch the computer working, isn't that funny, imagine me
| trying to compile that by hand and now tell me the difference. ;-)
What version are you planning to start with?
(I'd say no earlier than 1.0)
I can help you getting things to compile.
--
Lgb
