Branch Open Again

2013-05-07 Thread Richard Heck
Branch is open again for commits. The official release of 2.0.6 will be tomorrow. Richard

branch open again

2009-09-02 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Now that the Mac binary is ready, the freeze is lifted. Thanks for your patience, Jürgen

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-15 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Bennett testing would be welcome of course but you don't need him to > know if performance is better (especially since he's got is much > powerful box now). "-dbg painting" will tell you all. Compare the > console output of the patched and unpatched version while typing i

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:13:58 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) wrote: > Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > > see any problem. > > It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. > However, > I'd

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. However, I'd like it to be tested a bit. Expecially, I'd like a Mac user (Bennett?)

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > see any problem. It looks good on a first glance, and it seems to work fine on my box. However, I'd like it to be tested a bit. Expecially, I'd like a Mac user (Bennett?) to test whether this has

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Abdelrazak Younes wrote: What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. It's on my list. Please give me some time to look through it. No problem. Maybe some other volunteers would like to test it too? Abdel.

Re: wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't > see any problem. It's on my list. Please give me some time to look through it. Jürgen

wide() stuff ? (was Re: branch open again)

2007-10-08 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: the remaining po and doc changes can immediately be committed. What about this? I've been using it for quite a while now and I didn't see any problem. Abdel. Index: BufferView.cpp === --- BufferView.cp

branch open again

2007-10-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
the remaining po and doc changes can immediately be committed. Jürgen P.S.: even though I was added to the whitelist, my announcement mail to lyx-announce bounced. I contacted Mate and I try to send out another announcement mail later today.