On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 07:33:40PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 11:25 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 03:46:50PM +, José Matos wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 10:20 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > And also every time I come across something
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 11:25 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 03:46:50PM +, José Matos wrote:
> > On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 10:20 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > And also every time I come across something like this, I wonder
> > > if we
> > > can generalize the process of
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 03:46:50PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 10:20 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > And also every time I come across something like this, I wonder if we
> > can generalize the process of converting a new layout to ERT for
> > older formats. i.e., I just want
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 10:20 -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> And also every time I come across something like this, I wonder if we
> can generalize the process of converting a new layout to ERT for
> older formats. i.e., I just want to put a one-liner with "alertenv",
> and I want lyx2lyx to talk to
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 03:05:38PM +, José Matos wrote:
> On Sat, 2022-11-05 at 12:49 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Thanks, I'll try to do the lyx2lyx stuff and fileformat for this when
> > I can.
> >
> > Scott
>
> Essentially this is only relevant to reversion, right?
> The conversion co
On Sat, 2022-11-05 at 12:49 -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Thanks, I'll try to do the lyx2lyx stuff and fileformat for this when
> I can.
>
> Scott
Essentially this is only relevant to reversion, right?
The conversion code should be empty.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
--
lyx-devel mailing lis
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 07:13:30AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, dem 25.10.2022 um 21:15 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Is this something you think I can do for 2.4.0 or should I hold off?
> > I forget what the current status is.
>
> The problem is nobody knows that. Personal
Am Dienstag, dem 25.10.2022 um 21:15 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Is this something you think I can do for 2.4.0 or should I hold off?
> I forget what the current status is.
The problem is nobody knows that. Personally I am trying to hold back
all new features. I do not find adding a few style
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 08:16:15AM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, dem 23.10.2022 um 12:03 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Can I add a layout for alertenv? And similarly, for other envs (I
> > haven't checked yet which other ones we don't cover yet).
> >
> > Attached is an exampl
Am Sonntag, dem 23.10.2022 um 12:03 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Can I add a layout for alertenv? And similarly, for other envs (I
> haven't checked yet which other ones we don't cover yet).
>
> Attached is an example patch.
Sure. I think beamer has now quite a number we don't cover yet.
Don
Can I add a layout for alertenv? And similarly, for other envs (I
haven't checked yet which other ones we don't cover yet).
Attached is an example patch.
Scott
From c4440edbcc2d908a6b257245362dae4ce83a0f45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Scott Kostyshak
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 11:56:52 -0400
Subje
implement a \beamermaketitle command.
I'll rename it.
> Otherwise, it is very slightly less hackish than it was :)
In the context of the beamer layout, it's not very much hackish indeed ...
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3133
>
> The attached patch adds a "Title (Plain Frame)" style that can
> be used instead of "Title" to get a plain title frame (no head-/footlines
> and navigation bars). This is somewhat hackish, as a big p
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 21 September 2007 08:12:49 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> P.S.: José, I'm unsure about the file format policy in this specific case.
>> Would it require a file format change? If not, I'd like to commit this to
>> branch as well.
>
> This means tha
José Matos wrote:
> This means that if you a previous version of 1.5 (1.5.1) for all purposes
> you will not be able to work with that file if you use the new style as it
> will be converted to the default layout style.
>
> OTHO this is some kind of weak bondage in the sense that the files loads
On Friday 21 September 2007 08:12:49 Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> P.S.: José, I'm unsure about the file format policy in this specific case.
> Would it require a file format change? If not, I'd like to commit this to
> branch as well.
This means that if you a previous version of 1.5 (1.5.1) for a
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3133
The attached patch adds a "Title (Plain Frame)" style that can
be used instead of "Title" to get a plain title frame (no head-/footlines
and navigation bars). This is somewhat hackish, as a big part of the beamer
implementation in LyX is, but it's as go
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 10:43:15PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
> Martin,
>
> could you please check this beamer layout?
>
> # Theorems and such section
> Style Corollary
>
> LatexName corollary}%{
> LabelString "Corollary_&qu
Martin,
could you please check this beamer layout?
# Theorems and such section
Style Corollary
LatexName corollary}%{
LabelString "Corollary_"
End
Is this "_" a typo? Should it be dropped or replaced by a space?
Michael
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK for branch if tested (as I think it is)
I verified that beamer works again. I did not test if pfg.sty and xcolor.sty
are requested properly (but I did not touch that part anyway).
Committing now.
Jürgen
I don't have access to trunk here, so I'd appreciate if
someone could put the same in trunk.
Done.
Bo
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Bo Peng wrote:
>> Looks fine to me, but it is weird that nobody reported this.
Juergen> The change that causes this is only a week old (r16751).
Yes it is the result of a wrong indication I gave to Uwe, it seems.
OK fo
Bo Peng wrote:
> Looks fine to me, but it is weird that nobody reported this.
The change that causes this is only a week old (r16751).
Jürgen
OK for branch? I don't have access to trunk here, so I'd appreciate if
someone could put the same in trunk.
Looks fine to me, but it is weird that nobody reported this.
Bo
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Trying to compile a beamer document with current 1.4.4svn fails stating
> that "beamer.cls.cls could not be found". The attached patch solves this.
>
> OK for branch? I don't have access to trunk here, so I'd appreciate if
> someone could put the same in trunk.
>
>
Trying to compile a beamer document with current 1.4.4svn fails stating
that "beamer.cls.cls could not be found". The attached patch solves this.
OK for branch? I don't have access to trunk here, so I'd appreciate if
someone could put the same in trunk.
Jürgen
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> I assume tht it is also OK for 1.4.2?
Yes.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks OK to me.
Then it is going in.
Log:
* lib/scripts/layout2layout.py
(convert): Change "LabelType Static" to "LabelType Itemize" for
itemize environments
(convert): Change "LabelType Counter_EnumI" to "LabelType Enumerate"
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Instead of testing the name of the layout, I'd rather see test of
>> features
>>
>> itemize: LatexType Item_Environment LabelType Static
>>
>> enumerate: LatexType Item_Environment LabelType Counter_Enu
Dear list,
I think this is a known problem, since I have heard (misheard) a few
words about it.
In beamer, when I delete one or multiple frames, the skeleton of the
deleted part will remain. That is to say, the frame, columns, item ...
environments will remain, although all texts are removed. I
> That would look like the attached. Does it now do the right thing?
yes.
Bo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Instead of testing the name of the layout, I'd rather see test of
> features
>
> itemize:
> LatexType Item_Environment
> LabelType Static
>
> enumerate:
> LatexType Item_Environment
> LabelType Counter_EnumI
That would look like the attached. Does it now do the
> > What should I add to beamer.layout?
>
> Nothing. Try the attached patch.
>
The patch works for me.
Thanks.
Bo
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Bo Peng wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> With beamer class, under 1.4.x and 1.5svn, the enumerate
>> environment does not show numbers before the items. Itemize
>> environment works fine.
>>
>> What should I add to beamer.layout?
Georg> N
Bo Peng wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> With beamer class, under 1.4.x and 1.5svn, the enumerate environment
> does not show numbers before the items. Itemize environment works
> fine.
>
> What should I add to beamer.layout?
Nothing. Try the attached patch.
Jean-Marc, is it correct?
GeorgIndex: lib
Dear list,
With beamer class, under 1.4.x and 1.5svn, the enumerate environment
does not show numbers before the items. Itemize environment works
fine.
What should I add to beamer.layout?
Cheers,
Bo
> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> You should use _only_ the files from the local TeX
Herbert> distribution! The configure script should be able to test
Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp> kpsewhich powerdot.layout
Herbert>
/usr/local/texlive/2005/../texmf-local/tex
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> With the following "controversy" IÃ'd say "no" to insert
Lars> beamer.layout in LyX for 1.4.0
Definitely.
People who want this inclusion to happen for 1.4.1 or 1.4.2 should
create a bug and add there a patch to LaTeXConfig.lyx
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
|
| What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
| target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is
Herbert Voss schrieb:
I wrote _LyX_ should copy and not the user
LyX can't copy it when it isn't on the system. The user didn't install
it because he didn't know that it exists. So if for example beamer isn't
installed Lyx can't copy a layout file and the LyX user might never use
beame
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Herbert Voss schrieb:
What I want to say is, that _LyX itself_ should not
contain these files. They should be installed from the the local
distribution, then you'll be sure, that you have always the right
one.
But the average user don't want to copy layout files or registe
Herbert Voss schrieb:
What I want to say is, that _LyX itself_ should not
contain these files. They should be installed from the the local
distribution, then you'll be sure, that you have always the right
one.
But the average user don't want to copy layout files or register them
anywhere. H
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Herbert Voss schrieb:
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 from
2004-02-18 works with the beamer.layout.
but 2.x is incompatible to 3.0 and later
Not the layout file. I've presentations created with beamer 2.x and 3.x
using the same beamer.layout witho
Herbert Voss schrieb:
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 from
2004-02-18 works with the beamer.layout.
but 2.x is incompatible to 3.0 and later
Not the layout file. I've presentations created with beamer 2.x and 3.x
using the same beamer.layout without problems.
Powe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
Also older beamer class files beginnin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
Also older beamer class files beginning with beamer 2.0 f
Herbert Voss wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible w
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
teTe
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Lars or Jean-Marc, may I insert beamer.layout in LyX?
What kind of guarantee do we have that beamer is not a fast moving
target? Will everybody have a beamer.cls that is compatible with our
layout?
JMarc
in the big TeX distributions, so that people either
> need to install these packages manually or install an extra rpm to get
> them.
> I think that it is fine to include layout files for "standard" packages
> that are part of the big TeX distributions, I don't object to
ages that
are part of the big TeX distributions, I don't object to include the beamer
layout anymore :-)
Georg
On Monday 09 January 2006 20:30, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2006 11:54 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> > OK, I will ask for it to be included with the lyx rpm for Fedora.
>
> That would create more work for the lyx rpm creators. IMHO it should be
> included in the beamer rpm.
beamer comes
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2006 11:54 schrieb Jose' Matos:
> OK, I will ask for it to be included with the lyx rpm for Fedora.
That would create more work for the lyx rpm creators. IMHO it should be
included in the beamer rpm.
Georg
On Saturday 07 January 2006 12:53, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 10:20 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> > Jose' Matos wrote:
> > > is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
> >
> > I asked for this some time ago and Georg argument
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 10:20 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Jose' Matos wrote:
>
> > is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
>
> I asked for this some time ago and Georg argumented that it is a special
> package for its own on some Linux systems
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
It would be reasonable. I guess you should ask the beamer author what
he prefers.
Some time ago I asked him if we could ship it directly with LyX and he
allowed it (beamer is also under the GPL).
regards Uwe
> "Jose'" == Jose' Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jose'> Hi, is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer
Jose'> layout?
It would be reasonable. I guess you should ask the beamer author what
he prefers.
JMarc
Jose' Matos wrote:
is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
I asked for this some time ago and Georg argumented that it is a special
package for its own on some Linux systems that could cause problems.
Georg is this still the case?
regards Uwe
p
Hi,
is there any reason why we are not shipping the beamer layout?
I know that the beamer carries the layout there but it is not
automatically
installed. If we carried such file it would work as soon as lyx detected the
presence of beamer.
Someone asked for it in
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> p.s. have a nice time in Clignancourt
Merci, mais malheureusement je ne serai pas présent. Les autres devront
boire de la bière pour moi. ;-)
--
Angus
the current "hack", however brilliant it is.
I proposed once to include the beamer layout to LyX's layout collection.
But as I remember this could be problematic under Linux. Georg
explained it but I can't remember. If this problem could be fixed easily
or avoided we should sh
61 matches
Mail list logo
