Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Ahh. I thought you were talking about decent machines as well Angus> as a decent operating system. So sorry to hear you're Angus> regressing. I'm sorry too, but since compaq announced the death of alpha, it is getting more difficu

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 2:36 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> It is definitely a good thing. And when I am in france, I do too > >> work on tru64 4.0g. But this will not last long, since we bought > >> brand new linux boxen

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It is definitely a good thing. And when I am in france, I do too >> work on tru64 4.0g. But this will not last long, since we bought >> brand new linux boxen :( Angus> So dual boot! Dual boot tru64 on my linux PC??? JMarc

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 1:30 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> I use the proprietary operating system because I use other > Angus> proprietary software that doesn't run on Linux. I use 4.0e > Angus> because the bloat with

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I use the proprietary operating system because I use other Angus> proprietary software that doesn't run on Linux. I use 4.0e Angus> because the bloat with subsequent versions is enormous. No need to try to defend yourself. I'm sur

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 12:36 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Well, I wan't being ideological. I just want to compile the > Angus> bloody thing myself so I don't have to use a buggy library > Angus> that's 3 years older

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Well, I wan't being ideological. I just want to compile the Angus> bloody thing myself so I don't have to use a buggy library Angus> that's 3 years older than the one that everyone else is using. Yes, but that is because you use a

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:36 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> I do fork. But first I build a script containing all the > Angus> commands I need to go all the way from A to B which may involve > Angus> many, many steps.

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:38 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> It'd be nice if someone tied TC down and tickled his toes with > Angus> a feather until he released xforms as Open Source. > > You mean as Free Software, I guess? Well, I wan't being ideological. I just want to compile

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> No. Two reasons. 1. xformsGImage is vapourware at the moment Angus> whereas GImageXPM works. So all xforms users will always have Angus> an image loader. OK. Angus> 2. I have a 0.89.8 library that has flimage_dup, but it won't A

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I do fork. But first I build a script containing all the Angus> commands I need to go all the way from A to B which may involve Angus> many, many steps. I then run this shell script as a forked Angus> process. Seems a clean and log

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:18 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> yes ! especially if you can get quoting correct for characters in > >> filenames that latex allows, but the shell treats as special. > >> Assuming there are some

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 27 February 2002 11:02 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> I use xforms 0.89.0 today, but spl has just posted me a 0.89.9 > Angus> version so that I can create an xforms-based image loader. (My > Angus> version does

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> yes ! especially if you can get quoting correct for characters in >> filenames that latex allows, but the shell treats as special. >> Assuming there are some. Angus> Is that what QuoteName does? Anyway, human readable script Angus> cr

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> I use xforms 0.89.0 today, but spl has just posted me a 0.89.9 Angus> version so that I can create an xforms-based image loader. (My Angus> version does not have an FLIMAGE * flimage_dup(FLIMAGE *) Angus> routine to easily duplicat

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 6:06 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:52:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > I haven't yet had a BadWindow problem. This /may/ be due to a > > > possible workaround in my tree, so I'd like people to try the stuff > > > after Angus has applied i

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:52:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Not by me. Despite that gratuitous nastiness of yours, posting a section of > forms.h ;-) I think we can do it by making the necessary section of forkedcontr/call signal-safe and then adding the callback ... > > I haven't yet had

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 5:28 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:23:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Yes, this is the forkedcontroller playing games. Try again and > > it'd probably work. > > ok, so a little debugging needed there still :) Not by me. Despite that gratu

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:23:13PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Is that what QuoteName does? what's that ? > Ahhh. I'd forgotten about that. I think I've see something similar. A sort of > half drawn Alert dialog? Again, no idea yet. that's it. quite odd, I will dig after some more info. >

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 4:59 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:46:50PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > This is now a limitation of BufferView::updateInset which the GCacheItem > > calls explicitly in setStatus. Jürgen has said he'll have a look once this > > thing is in

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:46:50PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > This is now a limitation of BufferView::updateInset which the GCacheItem > calls explicitly in setStatus. Jürgen has said he'll have a look once this > thing is in cvs. ok > screen. Would it be a good thing for human readability

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 3:53 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:04:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > * Lazy loading. Don't try and load the file till you try to draw it. > > Your patch has a weird extra ')' that breaks the script. line 175 of GraphicsConverter.C > needs

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:04:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > * Lazy loading. Don't try and load the file till you try to draw it. Your patch has a weird extra ')' that breaks the script. line 175 of GraphicsConverter.C needs to be : 175 test << "if [ ! -f " << file << " ]; then

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 25 February 2002 10:16 pm, John Levon wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:04:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > The patch is at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2 > > can we have xformsGraphics* files too please ? No! Remove them from Makefile.am. They aren't used

Re: a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-25 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 07:04:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > The patch is at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2 can we have xformsGraphics* files too please ? (btw, your diffs are broken thanks to cvs - see Amir's fixcvsdiff at http://www.movement.uklinux.net/) regards jo

a fully working graphics patch

2002-02-25 Thread Angus Leeming
* Lazy loading. Don't try and load the file till you try to draw it. * asynchronous conversion to a loadable format. * "simple" clipping, roation, scaling of the view in LyX. The patch is at http://www.devel.lyx.org/~leeming/graphics.diff.bz2 It's 37kB in size. As far as I'm concerned, it's fin