>> No these are the differences. The general features are listed above
>> the comparison section.
> I have to admit that I am a little bit confused now.
>
> For example, ImageMagick is listed there (in the "comparison"
> section) in the following way:
> * Imagemagick, the program used
> Of course I understand that the installer is a moving target. But
> believe me, this is very confusing for the casual user. Given the
> complexity of the environment which LyX needs to work out-of-the-box,
> this seems very important.
unfortunately, this is not easy to solve. last lenghty di
> No these are the differences. The general features are listed above
> the comparison section.
I have to admit that I am a little bit confused now.
For example, ImageMagick is listed there (in the "comparison"
section) in the following way:
* Imagemagick, the program used by LyX for a
Joost Verburg wrote:
The problem is, it does not contain the actual comparison, it only
enumerates the features of the "alternative installer"... or maybe
I don't understand something obvious?
The information on this page is incomplete and is indeed not useful at
all. I would suggest to re
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> PDF updating similar to DVI/Postscript,
Not true.
You remove the PDF update button in your installer, right? Instead there
is only a combined view/update button.
> installation of all spell checker dictionaries using the installer
wizard,
Not true.
What I understan
> On the page below:
>
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller
>
> ... there is the section entitled "Comparison between the standard
> LyX-installer and LyXWinInstaller (alternative installer)".
>
> The problem is, it does not contain the actual comparison, it only
> enumerates the feat
> There are a number of features of the official installer that are missing in
the alternative one
> (e.g. installation by limited users,
Yes, you must have admin priviledges.
> PDF updating similar to DVI/Postscript,
Not true.
> installation of all spell checker dictionaries using the instal
Michal Skrzypek wrote:
The problem is, it does not contain the actual comparison, it only
enumerates the features of the "alternative installer"... or maybe
I don't understand something obvious?
The information on this page is incomplete and is indeed not useful at
all. I would suggest to
On the page below:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyXWinInstaller
... there is the section entitled "Comparison between the standard
LyX-installer and LyXWinInstaller (alternative installer)".
The problem is, it does not contain the actual comparison, it only
enumerates the features of the
