John,
Please have a look at the attached Qt layout for the Graphics dialog.
With the new ideas on Width/Height values, it can be so much simpler.
I'm not too familiar with Qt and designer, so don't use my .ui file
(I've removed too many items, such as spacers, grouping etc.)
This is just about l
Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> In latex you can either
> 1) Set only the width (the height is chosen such that aspect ratio is kept)
> 2) Set only the height (the width is chosen such that aspect ratio is kept)
> 3) Set both width & height (aspect ratio is not kept)
> 4) Set both width & height and use the
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:28:05PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> This might not be possible when, for example, you select the width to
> be 30% column-width. What would you write in the height field ?
Good point.
> > > > 2) Replace the "Screen display" check buttons by a choice-list that
> > >
>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:35:32PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I agree. I would never use it. Furthermore most users think that it does what
> they expect from "keep aspect ratio".
And some developers :)
Now I have a better idea what it does, yes, we should remove it.
regards
john
--
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> This option is almost useless.
> I think we can remove this button completely, and perhaps add
> an "extra options" field that will allow to enter extra options
> to the \includegraphics command.
I agree. I would never use it. Furthermore most users think that it does what
th
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:24:04PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>
> You are talking about different things. Currently, the "keep aspect ratio"
> button uses the "keepaspectratio" option from graphicx.
> "If set to true then both specifying 'width' and 'height' (or 'totalheight')
> does n
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 04:13:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:07:28PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > In latex you can either
> > 1) Set only the width (the height is chosen such that aspect ratio is kept)
> > 4) Set both width & height and use the keepaspectratio option
John Levon wrote:
> > With your suggestion, 1 & 4 are not possible.
>
> Why not ? We must simply do what GIMP does and update the "other" field
> correctly. e.g. I have aspect ratio set, and alter width, the height
> field should change appropriately.
You are talking about different things. Curre
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:07:28PM +0300, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> In latex you can either
> 1) Set only the width (the height is chosen such that aspect ratio is kept)
> 4) Set both width & height and use the keepaspectratio options:
> the image is scaled keeping the aspect ratio, such that neither o
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:23:57PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> 1) For both, LyX View and LaTeX Size, remove all the "Original Size",
> "Scale", "Costum" entries and reduce all that to merely:
>
> ---
> <> keep aspect ratio
>Width [__] [u]
>
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 08:23:57PM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> There are far too many fields and buttons.
yup
> I suggest the following:
>
> 1) For both, LyX View and LaTeX Size, remove all the "Original Size",
>"Scale", "Costum" entries and reduce all that to merely:
>
>--
Hi,
I would like to simplify the layout in the Graphics dialog.
There are far too many fields and buttons.
I suggest the following:
1) For both, LyX View and LaTeX Size, remove all the "Original Size",
"Scale", "Costum" entries and reduce all that to merely:
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
