Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I will not do neither of what you suggest. I will simply replace
that portion of code with other code adapted from the Forestieri
library as shown in the attached patch.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > I will not do neither of what you suggest. I will simply replace
> > that portion of code with other code adapted from the Forestieri
> > library as shown in the attached patch.
>
> Even better.
>
> I am
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I will not do neither of what you suggest. I will simply replace
> that portion of code with other code adapted from the Forestieri
> library as shown in the attached patch.
Even better.
I am picky about licenses because I expect people to respect the licenses of
my ow
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 06:38:47PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > + // This facet has been adapted from the STLPort library
>
> That means that this part of the code is under the STLPort license.
> The STLPort license is not GPL, so you either have to add a
Richard Heck wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The license is here: http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html. I think it
>>> is GPL-compatible, as the intention of the author seems to have been to
>>> issue a license freer than GPL: "There are absolutely no restrictions
Georg Baum wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The license is here: http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html. I think it
is GPL-compatible, as the intention of the author seems to have been to
issue a license freer than GPL: "There are absolutely no restrictions on
STLport use in commercial projects,
Richard Heck wrote:
> The license is here: http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html. I think it
> is GPL-compatible, as the intention of the author seems to have been to
> issue a license freer than GPL: "There are absolutely no restrictions on
> STLport use in commercial projects, and no royalties
While we are at the license issue, can someone check if it is
appropriate to use zip(), unzip() in zlib-1.2.3/contrib/minizip in
lyx? I do not see any license term, just
All files under this contrib directory are UNSUPPORTED. There were
provided by users of zlib and were not tested by the authors
Georg Baum wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ // This facet has been adapted from the STLPort library
That means that this part of the code is under the STLPort license.
The STLPort license is not GPL, so you either have to add additional license
information or revert this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + // This facet has been adapted from the STLPort library
That means that this part of the code is under the STLPort license.
The STLPort license is not GPL, so you either have to add additional license
information or revert this commit, depending on whether
10 matches
Mail list logo
