Richard Heck wrote: > The license is here: http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html. I think it > is GPL-compatible, as the intention of the author seems to have been to > issue a license freer than GPL: "There are absolutely no restrictions on > STLport use in commercial projects, and no royalties are involved. There > is no GPL. Please read your free license for details." That said, > however, more needs to be added here to conform to the terms of the > license, perhaps something like this: "This portion of the code, through > the marker `Close STLPort', is copyright 1999,2000 Boris Fomitchev, and > has been modified from the STLPort code."
As I understand the license that is not enough. The documentation must also tell that parts are licensed under the STLPort license. Of course IANAL. Georg
