Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 09:52:58AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I will not do neither of what you suggest. I will simply replace
that portion of code with other code adapted from the Forestieri
library as shown in the attached patch.
Even better.
I am picky about licenses because I expect people to respect the licenses of
my own code, so it is only right to respect the licenses of others, too.
Yes, but that was a so small portion of code for a so well defined task
that even without knowing a particular solution you would end up with
a very similar code. Not considering the fact that most probably that
code will never be triggered. Then, it was not my intention to be a
defrauder, otherwise I would have not mentioned that I was adopting
some other's code.
No, of course not. I certainly didn't intend to suggest any such thing,
and I don't think Georg did, either.
In any event, your solution is obviously the best. If I'd understood
what that code was doing, I'd have done that myself!
Richard
--
==================================================================
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==================================================================
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
