Georg Baum wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
The license is here: http://www.stlport.org/doc/license.html. I think it
is GPL-compatible, as the intention of the author seems to have been to
issue a license freer than GPL: "There are absolutely no restrictions on
STLport use in commercial projects, and no royalties are involved. There
is no GPL. Please read your free license for details." That said,
however, more needs to be added here to conform to the terms of the
license, perhaps something like this: "This portion of the code, through
the marker `Close STLPort', is copyright 1999,2000 Boris Fomitchev, and
has been modified from the STLPort code."
As I understand the license that is not enough. The documentation must also
tell that parts are licensed under the STLPort license.
Try this (IANALE): This portion of the code, through the marker `Close
STLPort', is licensed under the STLPort license and is copyright
1999,2000 Boris Fomitchev. It has been modified from the STLPort code.
Richard
--
==================================================================
Richard G Heck, Jr
Professor of Philosophy
Brown University
http://frege.brown.edu/heck/
==================================================================
Get my public key from http://sks.keyserver.penguin.de
Hash: 0x1DE91F1E66FFBDEC
Learn how to sign your email using Thunderbird and GnuPG at:
http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
