Jean-Pierre Chrétien writes:
>
> Steve Litt writes:
> > Only the type 1C are embedded. To produce the PDF I did the following:
> >
> > latex $1.tex
> > dvips -o $1.ps $1.dvi
> > ps2pdf12 -dPDFSETTINGS=/prepress -dMaxSubsetPct=100 -dSubsetFonts=true -
> > dEmbedAllFonts=true $1.ps
> >
>
Steve Litt writes:
?
>
> slitt mydesk:~$ gs --version
> 8.64
Hmm... would you mind to send me (privately) your example ?
jeanpierre dot chretien at free.fr
--
Jean-Pierre
On Sunday 15 November 2009 13:00:25 Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I use ps2pdf14 here (in fact, ps2pdf, which calls ps2pdf14). I do not know
> if this makes a difference, but I don't understand how it could.
> The problem may come from GhostScript istself (the switches are passed to
> gs).
>
> Her
Steve Litt writes:
>
> slitt mydesk:/d/at/books/mental$ pdffonts pthrive.pdf
> name type emb sub uni object ID
> - --- --- --- -
> Courier-Bold Type 1no
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:15 -0500, Steve Litt wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I read your doc and did what it asked, but still some of my fonts aren't
> embedded:
That's not my doc, that's the one of Jean-Pierre. My message was only
the answer to his. ;)
I cannot help you there, sorry.
- Sebastian
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 09:01:55 Sebastian Guttenberg wrote:
> > Your test exmaple is quite striking, as the latex file asks explicitly
> > for Type 1 fonts and the pdf output has Type 3 fonts :-(
> >
> > If you cretae pdf docs for others using ps2pdf, you will be better with
> > embedded fon
> Your test exmaple is quite striking, as the latex file asks explicitly for
> Type
> 1 fonts and the pdf output has Type 3 fonts :-(
>
> If you cretae pdf docs for others using ps2pdf, you will be better with
> embedded
> fonts as well. I have added an entry in the pdf FAQ about this in the wik
Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
>
> Well, it's one thing to optimize a file for the pdf-output and another
> that I am working usually with dvi and ps, but from time to time need
> to produce a pdf-version of it to somebody (who might use acroread on
> windows). It cannot be that the standard output
Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
> Jean-Marc wrote:
>> > but in both cases
>> > LyX still includes the package fontenc in the exported file.
>>
>> And is it a problem in practice?
>
> Not in practice any longer, but in principle: If I am not using a
> package at all, then it shouldn't be loaded I thi
On 9.11.09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
> > Sorry that I have posted my question to lyx-devel and not lyx-user, but
> > the reason was to suggest to make it possible to deselect the package
> > fontenc. And I still think that all packages should be deselectable. But
Jean-Marc wrote:
> > but in both cases
> > LyX still includes the package fontenc in the exported file.
>
> And is it a problem in practice?
Not in practice any longer, but in principle: If I am not using a
package at all, then it shouldn't be loaded I think. Loading it just
increases the probabi
Sebastian Guttenberg wrote:
> However, for me it is not
> possible to really deselect the package fontenc. I can choose another
> coding (like OT1) or I can leave the coding blank, but in both cases
> LyX still includes the package fontenc in the exported file.
The trick is to enter "default" to P
Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
> Günter told me also about this location of the font-encoding setting
> (indeed I wouldn't have searched it there).
> However, for me it is not
> possible to really deselect the package fontenc. I can choose another
> coding (like OT1) or I can leave the coding blank
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It is actually deselectable.
> The font encoding is very special because it is specified in global
> preferences (Output>LaTeX pane). This is from historical reasons, and
> should probably be moved to Document settings.
Günter told me also about this location of the f
Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
> Sorry that I have posted my question to lyx-devel and not lyx-user, but
> the reason was to suggest to make it possible to deselect the package
> fontenc. And I still think that all packages should be deselectable. But
> my specific problem for the moment is solved,
Thanks a lot JMarc and Günter for your interesting explanations!
I've tried now the LatinModern font which works indeed better.
Also changing the encoding to OT1 worked (if I don't want to search for
Umlauts ;-) )
Sorry that I have posted my question to lyx-devel and not lyx-user, but
the reason wa
On 2009-11-09, Sebastian Guttenberg wrote:
> --=-mP/gqFkSw2Oj9z5Utvva
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>> This is (most probably) a side-effect of using different fonts.
>> Unfortunately, you do not specify what about the PDF is so much worse.
>
Sebastian Guttenberg writes:
> Well, it's one thing to optimize a file for the pdf-output and another
> that I am working usually with dvi and ps, but from time to time need
> to produce a pdf-version of it to somebody (who might use acroread on
> windows). It cannot be that the standard output (w
Guenter Milde wrote:
> This is (most probably) a side-effect of using different fonts.
> Unfortunately, you do not specify what about the PDF is so much worse.
Thanks for your answer and sorry that I was not more precise. I thought
that perhaps it was a known problem. In general the text looks a b
On 2009-11-08, Sebastian Guttenberg wrote:
> Hi all
> I discovered several times that the quality of pdf-files (at least at
> the screen) is much much much worse when the package "fontenc" is
> included (using pdflatex).
This is (most probably) a side-effect of using different fonts.
Unfortunatel
20 matches
Mail list logo
