> On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:18:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > 2. The cursor is broken when it is inside a macro instance.
>
> When you move into a macro, the cursor doesn't appear where it should.
> In fact, it is drawn completely outside the math inset (and sometimes the
> screen scroll
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 10:18:30AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > 2. The cursor is broken when it is inside a macro instance.
>
> How?
When you move into a macro, the cursor doesn't appear where it should.
In fact, it is drawn completely outside the math inset (and sometimes the
screen scroll t
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do I understand it right that arrays for mated:
>>
>> 1. Do not have visual (border)lines
Andre> I have not seen any so far...
Well, if you look at the deinition of the array environment, it is the
same thing as a tabular, except th
> Do I understand it right that arrays for mated:
>
> 1. Do not have visual (border)lines
I have not seen any so far...
Moreover, multiline math is conceptually somewhat simpler than "real
tables" since it does not need to handle multicolumn cells.
> 2. Instead of having a InsetText they woul
> If you are going to rewrite array support, would it make sense to
> share code with the tabular inset? At latex level, these are the same
> objects, after all. I understand that there will be many problem, but
> this is the "ideal" solution, after all.
In theory yes.
In practice it'd probably
On 20-Apr-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If you are going to rewrite array support, would it make sense to
> share code with the tabular inset? At latex level, these are the same
> objects, after all. I understand that there will be many problem, but
> this is the "ideal" solution, after all
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I think a more suitable implementation of matrices and array
Andre> would involve a one-dimesional array (i.e. std::vector) of "row
Andre> structures", each holding another one-dimensional array of
Andre> "entries", an optional num
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:00:58PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > PS: Would be nice to get some more feedback to the "macro monster patch",
> > otherwise I'll have a hard time to force-feed this down Lars's throat ;-}
>
> I had few problems with your patch:
> 1. In macro instances, the argumen
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 06:00:58PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: Would be nice to get some more feedback to the "macro monster patch",
> otherwise I'll have a hard time to force-feed this down Lars's throat ;-}
I had few problems with your patch:
1. In macro instances, the argument where not
