On 20-Apr-2001 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> If you are going to rewrite array support, would it make sense to
> share code with the tabular inset? At latex level, these are the same
> objects, after all. I understand that there will be many problem, but
> this is the "ideal" solution, after all.
Well I don't think that we save a lot reusing tabular code (and I'm not sure
it's at all possible). Do I understand it right that arrays for mated:
1. Do not have visual (border)lines
2. Instead of having a InsetText they would have a InsetFormula as BaseCellInset
3. The produced latexcode is slightly different
The big problem I see here is the different BaseCellInset, otherwise we could
make a ArrayBase.C and the use this for tabular.C and matharray.C.
Jürgen
P.S.: I still think Andre is faster to implement the array as he likes to do
it, but please proof me false!
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Nobody ever died from oven crude poisoning.
