On 2017-01-11, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 21:33:42, schrieb Günter Milde
>
>> The attached file works fine here with ucharclasses under XeTeX.
> Does not compile here because of missing font.
I installed this font via the Debian package "fonts-linex". It has a wide
rang
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 21:33:42, schrieb Günter Milde
> The attached file works fine here with ucharclasses under XeTeX.
>
Does not compile here because of missing font.
BUT, selecting a Korean font like UnBatang works. Even with empty preamble.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description:
On 2017-01-11, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> 2017-01-11 17:12 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>> > Thanks Jürgen.
>> > Committed my patch too.
>> Thanks.
>> > Now we have unwanted
2017-01-11 17:12 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak :
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jürgen.
> > Committed my patch too.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Now we have unwanted messages e.g. for the test
> "export/doc/de/UserGuide_pdf4_texF".
> > I think, this is unrelated to t
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 10:27:34AM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Thanks Jürgen.
> Committed my patch too.
Thanks.
> Now we have unwanted messages e.g. for the test
> "export/doc/de/UserGuide_pdf4_texF".
> I think, this is unrelated to the last patches.
I did a bisect based on the pass/failure o
Am Mittwoch, 11. Januar 2017 um 09:22:21, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 20:40 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> > As Kornel provided a use case and I can see other possible uses for
> > command-line export of documents, I withdraw my objection.
> >
> > Please commit.
>
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 20:40 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> As Kornel provided a use case and I can see other possible uses for
> command-line export of documents, I withdraw my objection.
>
> Please commit.
OK. Done.
Jürgen
>
> Günter
>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally s
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 08:40:00PM +, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-01-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> > [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
>
> > Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> >> Jürgen, I have a patch ready to push which builds on top o
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:33:42PM +0100, Günter Milde wrote:
> On 9.01.17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen
On 2017-01-10, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
>> Jürgen, I have a patch ready to push which builds on top of your
>> patch.
>> Please commit.
> I don't have the impression there is
Am Dienstag, den 10.01.2017, 14:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko:
> Jürgen, I have a patch ready to push which builds on top of your
> patch.
> Please commit.
I don't have the impression there is general consensus on this.
Jürgen
>
> Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 16:33:45, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 10:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Let's first ask Kornel and Günter. Do you think we should turn this
> > option on by default for the tests? I don't know too much about this,
> > but it makes se
On 9.01.17, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 sch
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 17:07:01, schrieb Kornel Benko
> Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:55:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> >
> > > I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in
> > > tests
> > >
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:55:06, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in
> > tests
> > does not feel right if used in general.
>
> Sounds good to me. Seems like
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 04:50:55PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in
> tests
> does not feel right if used in general.
Sounds good to me. Seems like you and Jürgen agree on this. Kornel,
would it be difficult to incorporate thi
Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:15:56, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, de
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 10:15 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> Let's first ask Kornel and Günter. Do you think we should turn this
> option on by default for the tests? I don't know too much about this,
> but it makes sense to me because it will help make the tests less
> sensitive to font choic
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > > Ignoring the
Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > > Ignoring the
> > > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative.
> > >
> >
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > Ignoring the
> > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative.
> >
> > Perhaps. Does anyone volunteer to do this work?
>
> Please try the attach
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Ignoring the
> > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative.
>
> Perhaps. Does anyone volunteer to do this work?
Please try the attached patch. The lyx option
--ignore-error-message missing_glyphs
does what you need
Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I doubt you will find a free suitable font that is expected to be
> > installed on every user's box so that "a user just clicking "'use
> > non-
> > TeX fonts' and compiling will get the correct result."
>
> Until now we pretty m
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 01:08:44PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 11:41 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> > I see. But as the tests should correspond to "normal" LyX behaviour,
> > we
> > should rather
> >
> > a) fix the document: we can set a custom non-tex font that
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 11:41 + schrieb Guenter Milde:
> I see. But as the tests should correspond to "normal" LyX behaviour,
> we
> should rather
>
> a) fix the document: we can set a custom non-tex font that contains
> the
> missing characters. This way a user just clicking "use non-
On 2016-12-28, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> [-- Type: text/plain, Encoding: quoted-printable --]
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 05:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>> > Note, though, that the missing glyphs message is a warning, not an
>> > error. We treat it as an error in the GUI, for good reas
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:25:51AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 05:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > Note, though, that the missing glyphs message is a warning, not an
> > > error. We treat it as an error in the GUI, for good reasons (since
> > it
> > > seve
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 05:20 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Note, though, that the missing glyphs message is a warning, not an
> > error. We treat it as an error in the GUI, for good reasons (since
> it
> > severely can impact the output), but it does not stop LaTeX from
> > processing.
>
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 04:27 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > I know nothing about this so I'll go along with whatever others
> > decide.
> > Günter might have an opinion.
> >
> > If we do implement the above we might wa
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 04:27 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I know nothing about this so I'll go along with whatever others
> decide.
> Günter might have an opinion.
>
> If we do implement the above we might want a general solution for
> ignoring other errors. I think there might be an enh
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:38:02AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Probably not. But there are free alternatives that might suffice:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_Unicode_typefaces
OK thanks.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 04:09 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Note that the
> > CJK quotation marks used in sec. 3.9.3.2 are not covered in some
> fonts.
> > You will probably need a rather comprehensive font (such as Arial
> > Unicode MS).
>
> I don't have this font. Is it free?
Probably
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 10:11:16AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> A more general and probably generally useful solution is to add a
> command line option that makes LyX (again) proceed despite the missing
> glyphs warning (and just report the warning). Then the tests could use
> this option.
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 09:58 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> For the sake of the tests, we could just add something like the
> following to the preamble that intentionally ignores these missing
> chars:
>
> \AtBeginDocument{%
> \usepackage{newunicodechar}
> \newcommand\lyxbypasschar[2]{%
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:58:08AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> However, I am reluctant to include it in the UG's preamble just for the
> sake of making the tests happy.
I agree.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 09:07:45AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.12.2016, 16:02 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > The following tests on current master are failing:
> >
> > export/doc/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
> > export/doc/UserGuide_pdf4_systemF (Failed)
> >
Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 09:07 +0100 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller:
> Am Dienstag, den 27.12.2016, 16:02 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > The following tests on current master are failing:
> >
> > export/doc/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
> > export/doc/UserGuide_pdf4_systemF (Failed)
> >
Am Dienstag, den 27.12.2016, 16:02 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> The following tests on current master are failing:
>
> export/doc/UserGuide_dvi3_systemF (Failed)
> export/doc/UserGuide_pdf4_systemF (Failed)
> export/doc/UserGuide_pdf5_systemF (Failed)
Does "systemF" mean non-TeX fonts?
38 matches
Mail list logo
