Am Montag, 9. Januar 2017 um 10:15:56, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@lyx.org> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 03:23:47PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Montag, den 09.01.2017, 09:12 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 10:41:41AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, den 08.01.2017, 09:22 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > > > > > Ignoring the > > > > > > missing glyphs warning strikes me a better alternative. > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps. Does anyone volunteer to do this work? > > > > > > > > Please try the attached patch. The lyx option > > > > --ignore-error-message missing_glyphs > > > > does what you need. > > > > > > The patch looks good. > > > > So shall I commit? > > Let's first ask Kornel and Günter. Do you think we should turn this > option on by default for the tests? I don't know too much about this, > but it makes sense to me because it will help make the tests less > sensitive to font choice.
I'd prefer to make the behaviour be document specific. Ignoring errors in tests
does not feel right if used in general.
> If we don't turn it on by default for the ctests, it might still make
> sense to commit the patch for other use cases.
Here I am not so sure. The user already has the possibility to use 'Show Output
Anyway'.
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
