On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 28.12.2016, 04:27 -0500 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > > I know nothing about this so I'll go along with whatever others > > decide. > > Günter might have an opinion. > > > > If we do implement the above we might want a general solution for > > ignoring other errors. I think there might be an enhancement request > > about this somewhere. > > Note, though, that the missing glyphs message is a warning, not an > error. We treat it as an error in the GUI, for good reasons (since it > severely can impact the output), but it does not stop LaTeX from > processing.
I do remember this. But since the default is to treat it as an error, I'm not sure we should treat it differently from any LaTeX error. > I've actually been interested in the opposite: I would like a way to > > turn warnings into errors. I suppose that only the warnings on the > > last > > compilation should be considered (from what I understand, the > > intermediate compilations often produce expected warnings). > > What do you mean by "errors"? Just make LyX stop processing (that would > be a bad idea, IMHO) or report the warnings somewhat more loudly? Report the warnings more loudly. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
